Divorce movement’s ‘yes to marriage’
The logo and slogan launched yesterday. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
People should be asked to vote on a specific divorce law in a referendum, the pro-divorce movement said during the launch of its new logo and slogan yesterday.
The question in an eventual referendum on divorce should make reference to the salient points of the Bill currently before Parliament so that people would know what they were voting for, Moviment Iva Għad-Divorzju chairman Deborah Schembri said.
The movement’s new rallying cry sees the initial Yes to Divorce slogan joined by Yes to Marriage.
Dr Schembri said the movement was in favour of divorce because it gave people whose marriage had failed a chance to re-marry. The current state of affairs, she said, forced people whose marriage had broken down into cohabitation.
Asked about the new organisation which would campaign against divorce, Dr Schembri said her movement wanted to give people more rights.
“This is the primary distinction between us. We want to give people a chance to re-marry while the opposing camp want to deny separated people that possibility,” she said.
The introduction of divorce would not usher in a divorce mentality because, today, without divorce, people whose marriage had failed were already going their separate ways. A divorce law would not change this mentality but it would regularise what happened afterwards, Dr Schembri said.
Asked if the 1995 Church/State agreement would impact on legislation for the introduction of divorce, Dr Schembri said it would not conflict with the divorce law. As things stand, in annulment cases proceedings in the civil court have to stop until the outcome of a Church tribunal decision if one of the parties opts for the latter.
Dr Schembri said this would not happen in the case of divorce because it was not covered by the Church/State agreement, making it purely a civil matter.
Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, who initially piloted the Private Member’s Bill last year, said the movement was not there to campaign for a referendum but for the enactment of a divorce law.
However, he agreed with Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi that such a decision was best taken by the people since no party in Parliament had an electoral mandate to introduce divorce.
Dr Gonzi made it clear last week that a roadmap on how the issue would be settled would be made public at the end of the month after the PN concluded its internal discussion.
Asked what decision the PN was expected to take, Dr Pullicino Orlando said the debate was carrying on and hinted that the party would probably toe Dr Gonzi’s line and propose a parliamentary debate on divorce and a referendum.
The logo launch was marred by a mistake in the slogan, which was not written in Maltese fonts, prompting a barrage of negative comments on timesofmalta.com. The movement later re-issued the logo with Maltese fonts and yet it had another mistake when “divorzju” was written with a ż.
The movement then apologised for the mistake and re-sent a correctly spelt logo. However, criticism of what the logo attempts to convey was also widespread.
Made up of faceless adults and children, the logo depicts a couple with a child going separate ways and forming new families with other people. The separated parents though are both holding their child’s hands, while one of them also has a child from his new family.
Although the logo attempts to convey a sense of harmony by showing the child of the divorced family holding both his parents’ hands while the new families are seemingly happy, it attracted a lot of criticism.
Some described it as celebrating a hotchpotch of families with people doing as they pleased. Others pointed out that the child of the divorced parents got the worst deal, having been caught in the middle, while the colour red used to depict the children was equated with danger.
Someone else gave a totally different interpretation, insisting she saw the logo depicting families on good terms with each other and parents sharing responsibilities.
Those present for the launch included Labour MP Evarist Bar-tolo, Labour European Parliament candidate Marlene Mizzi, AD chairman Michael Briguglio and AD civil rights spokesman Yvonne Ebejer Arqueros.
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Galea
May 3rd 2011, 13:28
@joe zammit
YOU MUST BE LIVING IN THE STONE AGE!!!!!!!! CATHOLIC FANATIC
Lino Apap
Jan 18th 2011, 19:05
Joe Zammit - are you saying that married couples living in all the countries of the world (except Malta & the Philippines are cohabiting because divorce is available in these countries? U hallina ha nghixu!!!
Marriage, even in Malta is NOT forever. It exists as long as the couple love each other. If they don't, marriage only lasts until they get a separation, an annulment (be it civil or church-awarded) or a divorce from abroad. Come down from the clouds you're in!
As to there being no bond in cohabitation, tell that to the many couples who are forced to cohabit because one or both are separated and can't remarry. They will tell you where to get off. Having said that however, you are right that there is no LEGAL bond, which is you the Yes to Divorce Movement is working to introduce this necessary law onto the civil statute books. Whether these people will be committing a sin or not is finally up to the Almighty to decide but it is certainly not up to you - Sorry!
Joe Zammit
Jan 18th 2011, 16:49
Health - Sickness = Health
Marriage - Divorce = Marriage
Marriage + Divorce = Cohabitation
Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it's already guaranteed!
K. Fenech
Jan 19th 2011, 09:42
Mr. Zammit please do not include religion in this matter. Think of the other people who do not practice Christianity.
Joe Zammit
Jan 18th 2011, 16:45
Divorce renders marriage cohabitation. In cohabitation there is no bond. Also in a marriage including divorce there is no bond because when they want the couple can for some reason or another get a divorce. Divorce is literally another form of cohabitation.
Marriage and only marriage is serious and beneficial to every human society. The two characteristics of marriage are UNITY and INDISSOLUBILITY. Marriage is for ever.
No person can vote for divorce without sinning seriously against God.
david debattistad
Jan 18th 2011, 18:42
@ jOE ZAMMIT
it is said that a journey is like marriage. The certain way to be wrong is to
think you control it.
Joseph M. Scicluna
Jan 18th 2011, 13:47
The British Prime Minister Mr Cameron is contemplating on issueing a tax on registering a Divorce to minimize broken families. Is he going mad or are we too bright? Hawwadni ha nifmek!
T Mifsud
Jan 18th 2011, 13:31
What a mess of a logo and a misleading one for that as is the whole group!
Lino Apap
Jan 18th 2011, 13:10
@ Joe Zammit - sorry Mr. Zammit you got your equation mixed up. It is not
Marriage + divorce = cohabitation BUT Marriage - Divorce = cohabition.
Keep in mind that divorce is a civil remedy that comes into effect when a marriage breaks down irretievably and is requested by the ex-spouses (if they want to) after at least 4 years of living apart. The religious marriage is left intact in its mummified state.
Joe Zammit
Jan 18th 2011, 10:55
Divorce is a great social evil, condemned by Christ. It was evil yesterday, it is also today and it will remain so until the end of time.
No MP, no person can vote in favour of divorce. To divorce is evil and condemned by God. God unites a couple in marriage for ever and no one, no State has the right to dissolve their marriage.
Divorce is a grave sin. Helping anyone to divorce is equally a grave sin. Voting in parliament in favour of divorce is grave sin that separates that MP from God and puts him on the way to hell. Divorce pleases only the devil and his followers.
Marriage + divorce = cohabitation
Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it's already guaranteed!
carmelo Aquilina
Jan 18th 2011, 13:24
Mr Zammit for someone who is certain of divine victory on this issue you really are sounding very desperate with your cut and paste comments... would you please leave this to God and stop boring us ... !