Advert

Satirical PBS programme suspended after ‘illegal’ clip

The shoe must not go on... a video grab of Arnold Cassola taking part in the ‘illegal’ game.

The shoe must not go on... a video grab of Arnold Cassola taking part in the ‘illegal’ game.

The satirical television programme VIP Xow has been suspended by the national broadcaster after the station editor found a clip aired in last Monday’s show to be illegal and in bad taste.

The offensive part involved a game in which contestants were asked to hurl shoes at three tins featuring photos of President George Abela, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi and Labour leader Joseph Muscat. According to law it is illegal to ridicule the President.

Following a meeting of the Public Broadcasting Services’ editorial board on Friday, the VIP Xow producers were informed their programme was being suspended with immediate effect, The Sunday Times learnt.

The decision was taken on grounds that the board had to ensure laws were respected and that the station’s reputation was not prejudiced.

VIP Xow show, aired on TVM on Mondays at 10 p.m., was one of the new programmes during the launch of the 2010-2011 schedule in September.

It is presented by popular comic trio Zoo – Chrysander Agius and Daniel Chircop together with Owen Bonnici, known in the programme as Freddie Hotpants.

On last Monday’s show, Alternattiva Demokratika’s former chairman Arnold Cassola was one of four guests.

When it was Prof. Cassola’s turn to play the shoe-throwing game, the tins were brought very close to him so he could hit them easily, knock them down and “finally win something” – a play on AD’s lack of electoral success.

The decision taken by PBS to black out the game was criticised by the Front Against Censorship.

Last Thursday, PBS editor Natalino Fenech said the decision had nothing to do with censorship and pointed out it was illegal to ridicule the President.

The Press Act says that whoever uses “defamatory, insulting or disparaging words, acts or gestures” in contempt of the President would be committing a criminal offence liable to a jail term of up to three months or a fine. Dr Fenech also said he thought the game was in bad taste.

Despite not being aired on TVM, the clip was uploaded onto Facebook and the video-sharing website You Tube.

It was then removed from circulation after the VIP Xow team were advised to withdraw it by their lawyer, presenter Chrysander Agius had said.

“The law is there and I respect it even though I might not agree with it.

“When the script was written it did not cross our minds it was in bad taste or potentially illegal,” he said, adding it was just meant to be funny.

Members of the VIP Xow team could not be reached for comment yesterday.

Advert

25 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Jurgen Camilleri

Jan 11th 2011, 19:04

Couldn't have said it better myself. Iva kien hemm ghalfejn jissospenduh? Mux bizzejjed ma rajnijiex? Ara vera qisna qed nghixu fi zmien il-qedem. Grow up!

Marco Cremona

Jan 9th 2011, 23:34

J.Borg Have you ever watched the programme? Do you know that various members of parliament from both parties have participated in the show and made to play games as the one Dr. Arnold Cassola played? Why pick on him only? And anyway Dr. Cassola only features in this article because it happened to be him to be made to play this game. It could have been anybody else. I guess he was not privy as to what kind of games he would be made to play. What would you have done in his place? Leave the studio and be labelled a 'spoilsport' forever? If you care to note, Dr. Cassola was not held to blame....it was the programme producers who were taken to task.

Ramon Casha

Jan 10th 2011, 07:13

Dr. Cassola???? He was one of the guests. He did not organise the show, and probably did not know beforehand of the nature of this game. The organisers decided to poke some fun at him and AD and, apparently, he took it as a good-natured joke.

Ramon Casha

Jan 10th 2011, 07:16

PS: Why only Cassola? According to the article he was not the only guest or even the first one to participate in this game.

Marco Cremona

Jan 9th 2011, 23:43

Well said Wesley. Isn't the ability to laugh at oneself a measure of self-esteem? Bet the President and the other two political leaders can take a joke - and probably would have volunteered at throwing the shoe themselves.

Martin Cassar

Jan 10th 2011, 13:17


Were the USA’s sacred code of freedom of expression and freedom of speech applicable where Wikileaks involved?

David Cassar

Jan 10th 2011, 18:28

It is not illegal to make fun of the prime minister or the leader of opposition but it is illegal to make fun of the president and this I think makes sense because if the president is there to represent us we are making a fool of ourselves when making a fool out of him. I think the president is one of the best we've had and I think a country has truly failed when those living in it make fun of the person who represents it I ahve sometimes seen the show and think that the presenters go a little too faand cross the limits in some episodes but still if it's funny and legal there isn't a reason why not make fun of people and joke with them but the president should'nt be made fun of after all he is doing only good to this country

John Borg

Jan 9th 2011, 17:54

I checked the clip. no one is seen throwing a shoe at the Queen's face! Do you fin it acceptable that someone throws a shoe at your image? don't do onto others what you don't want someone do it to you! PBS did the right thing.

R.Grima

Jan 10th 2011, 08:02

Dear Mr Borg, If it's a satirical programme they can throw a dozen shoes at my image face I won't be bothered one single bit. My point on showing the you tube clip is because in the article it stated: According to law it is illegal to ridicule the President. Are they not riducling the Queen in that clip? shoe or no shoe. We have a LOT to learn from the British. Mr Borg if you don't like the programme don't watch it. simple as that.

GiovDeMartino

Jan 9th 2011, 17:12

Freedom of speech in Malta existed only in the 70's and 80'.s And there was no censorship, neither. There was a time when the MUT's delegate was not peremitted to distribute the magazine The Teacher bec it critisized the minister. We were not allowed to even watch The Raid on Entebbe.

Advert
Advert