Advert

Arraigned over hoax bomb threats

Two hoax bomb threats at the law courts were made by a man who wanted to postpone his scheduled court sittings, a magistrate heard yesterday.

Carlos Falzon, 24, is pleading not guilty to making the hoax phone calls to police headquarters in Floriana from a phone booth opposite the law courts in Valletta on December 10 and on Wednesday.

Police Inspector James Grech explained the two phone calls, which were recorded, were made on the days Mr Falzon had to appear in court.

“On Wednesday, only four cases were being heard in the appeals court, including one on the bail conditions Mr Falzon breached,” he said.

Mr Falzon, from Żejtun, also pleaded not guilty to filing a false report and misusing telecommunications equipment.

He was also charged with committing a crime during the operative term of a suspended sentence, breaching two separate bail conditions and relapsing.

Mr Grech said Mr Falzon’s girlfriend and cousin heard the recordings of the bomb threats and said he was not with them when these were made.

“Although he refused to give us a statement, he got angry when we told him his girlfriend and cousin were going to give us statements. He said: ‘Now I’ll make them eat their statements’,” the prosecuting officer said.

“It’s not true,” Mr Falzon said before Magistrate Audrey Demicoli warned him to remain quiet.

Defence lawyer Simon Micallef Stafrace argued his client was only charged with two hoax phone calls. “We have been facing the scourge of bomb threats for years. This is not something that started happening these past two days,” he said. “We have to forget the previous ones.”

He requested bail but the prosecution objected. “He is not trustworthy and still has other pending cases in court,” Mr Grech said.

Magistrate Demicoli refused bail and remanded Mr Falzon in custody.

Advert

3 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Charles Sammut

Dec 24th 2010, 14:02

@ my namesake

Do not blame this newspaper for any lack of freedom of speech, real or percieved. If this webiste publishes anything that is defamatory or libelous or in any way, however remotely, can be construed as hateful, it has to answer for it.

To be fair, I find that the vast majority of my comments get posted. I don't complain about what gets left out. Even if what I have written is perfectly true, I understand that every newspaper has its agenda and some comments might not fit. It would be naive to suppose otherwise.

On a different matter, I wish that user names are not duplicated because regular readers might attribute one person's comments to somebody else. I notice for example that there is another Charles Sammut who writes NY after his name. Very considerate of him.

Advert
Advert