Advert

Sliema villa scheduling welcomed

The baroque entrance to Villa Bonici in St Agatha Street, Sliema. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

The baroque entrance to Villa Bonici in St Agatha Street, Sliema. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

The scheduling of parts of Villa Bonici in Sliema as grade 2 property was welcomed by the Sliema Residents Association and environment NGO Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar, which have been lobbying for its protection.

FAA also welcomed the scheduling by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority’s heritage unit of 16 historic sites, confirming the increased importance the authorities were giving to the protection of heritage.

Describing the move as the first important step in improving the Sliema urban environment, the SRA noted the whole of Villa Bonici estate should have been scheduled to reduce further development in an already unsustainable town and to retain Sliema’s last major green lung.

It was a pity the lower half of the garden was not considered for scheduling, given its unique features that also deserved protection, it said.

Apartments, built on the site of a large part of the lower garden and perimeter wall in the 1950s were also up for redevelopment to “entirely close off all Sliema within an 11-floor bastion-like structure”.

The association has been asking for the revision of building heights around this sensitive area and its proposals include a long promised home for the elderly.

“The scheduling of Villa Bonici is a significant victory for Sliema’s already depleted heritage,” FAA said, adding the villa’s garden should be purchased by the authorities for public use, restored and opened as a park.

The recent list of scheduled properties includes archaeological sites in Rabat, Żurrieq, Mellieħa and Kerċem while buildings include Villa Madama in Balzan, the Rialto Cinema in Cospicua and an underground flour mill at San Ġwann.

FAA pointed out that Mepa had the legal power to order owners of scheduled properties to carry out basic maintenance where it was lacking. Failing this, it could step in, carry out the works and bill the owners. However, due to its present budgetary constraints, it is almost impossible for it to fund the money for this, the NGO said.

Advert

3 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joe Borg

Dec 20th 2010, 15:52

@ Ms. Vella,

So now you are expecting that TAX payer's money goes to supporting property owners!!

For your information, systems like you are proposing alredy exist on other countries, but then the owners have to open their homes to visitors and the property has to be of substancial architectural/historical value.

Astrid Vella

Dec 21st 2010, 02:11


No, Mr. Borg, we are expecting tax-payers’ money to invest in Maltese architectural heritage, which in turn attracts tourists, who provide employment for thousands of Maltese and Gozitans and inject much-needed revenue into our economy. The funds given out to help maintain such properties would be a fraction of what we stand to lose in tourism revenues if we continue as we have done for the last few years, allowing our heritage to fall to wrack and ruin. Is that what you would prefer?

Of course we are aware that such schemes exist overseas. I don’t believe there is anything in what we wrote that precludes the possibility of having properties opened to the public. This would be a scheme that would have to be very well thought out with obligations proportionate to public investment which does not have to be massive – after all nobody objected to the balconies restoration scheme or expected the balconies to be opened to the public!

Rather than being negative, let us invest our energy in solutions that both save our heritage and boost our economy – win-win all round.

Advert
Advert