Sudanese migrants claim they are being kept in Malta
Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
About 70 Sudanese migrants living in Malta turned up at the offices of the UN Refugee Agency yesterday claiming that while Somalis and Eritreans were being resettled in the EU they were being kept here on the island.
The migrants, most of whom enjoy some form of protection, complained that the resettlement process was very slow and many of them had been in Malta for six years.
Farouk Bebekir, 28, said the government seemed to prefer resettling other East Africans because the Sudanese were known to be hard-working, adaptable and could also communicate in Maltese.
“But there is no future here,” he said, pointing out that permanent work was difficult to find and bills were constantly on the rise.
“We have been here for six years and we don’t get any help. Others have gone to Europe to become doctors and we are still here, struggling to pay water and electricity bills.”
He added that refugees who had been resettled to other EU countries could obtain a passport to travel and even bring over their families to live with them and build a future together. But in Malta they could not travel freely and had not seen their family for years.
“If the government wants to keep us here, the conditions must improve. We need to be given help to find good work and job training. We need to get the same benefits Maltese employees receive and we need to be able to travel.”
He added that if they could not be resettled and the situation in Malta did not improve, some would probably prefer to go back to Darfur and die there. “At least we will die in our country with our friends and family not here alone, with nothing.”
A spokesman for the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, which is in charge of resettlement, admitted the process took long but he denied there was any discrimination between nationals of different countries.
“Twenty per cent of Sudanese have been resettled,” said the spokesman, Fabrizio Ellul, adding this was not a low figure compared to other nationalities.
He stressed, however, that resettlement was not a right and if countries offered to take migrants from Malta the decision on who to take was theirs.
Countries generally take vulnerable migrants who find it difficult to integrate.
The UNHCR spokesman added that integration programmes needed to be improved for people who had to stay in Malta, at least until they were resettled.
The US Embassy yesterday said 16 refugees from Eritrea, Sudan and Somalia left Malta to begin a new life in the US in the past week.
Some 587 refugees have been resettled in a number of countries since May 2008.
US Ambassador Douglas Kmiec said: “The refugee resettlement programme represents a small contribution by the people of the US to help alleviate the world’s suffering.” He thanked the government, the UNHCR and the International Organisation for Migration as well as the Jesuit Refugee Service and the Emigrants Commission.
“Once they arrive in the US, each refugee will be assigned a sponsor agency that provides initial services such as housing, food and clothing, as well as referral to medical care, employment services and other support during a transition period lasting up to two years in order to ensure integration and assimilation.”
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Sean Grima
Dec 16th 2010, 10:43
as usual, the comments prove that racism is the product of ignorance.
Martin Cassar
Dec 16th 2010, 08:50
First of all, Ms Vella, no Sub-Saharan irregular immigrant ever chose to come to Malta. If you read the article carefully, they are not really asking to stay, but to go away. You write a lot of negative comments; perhaps it would be better if you learn how to read, first.
Mr Ellul, I would like to see you living in Malta 60 years ago. Perhaps you too would have crossed the seas in order to find a better life and help your family that way. Oh, but Malta had no genocide. And Sudan did. Now, if my reasoning is any good, genocide = big big trouble + no structures to legitimate border crossing. So, they are irregular? Yes. Illegal? No - because they had no other option.
But you ladies and gentlemen, feel free to criticise.
Kevin Seychell
Dec 16th 2010, 02:40
they should have never came here in the first place,If want to leave let me leave, good riddance!!!!! we can get our jobs,houses and space wasted back. thats the thanks malta and the maltese people get in return!
Phil Humphries
Dec 15th 2010, 22:35
Well, if the 'protection' they so desperately sought isn't enough for them, then perhaps they might prefer the good life back in Sudan ?
Any time you're ready, boys.
Mario Ellul
Dec 15th 2010, 20:14
Why not go back to the Sudan and enjoy the kind of culture and freedom that you can never find in Malta.
M Fleri
Dec 15th 2010, 18:06
@ L Desira
Maybe you should be thanking the Lord you were not born a Sudanese, something for you to think about.
L. Desira
Dec 15th 2010, 15:52
I hope that they do not forget where they came from...
http://www.skynews.com.au/topstories/article.aspx?id=552103&vId=2017134
Louise Vella
Dec 15th 2010, 15:01
"Sudanese migrants claim they are being kept in Malta"!! Let me assure them that they are not being kept here by the will of the majority of the common people of Malta.
Sean Grima
Dec 16th 2010, 00:56
what the common people think is irrelevant
Louise Vella
Dec 15th 2010, 14:56
These illegal immigrants should send a message, loud and clear, to all their countrymen and all those sub-Saharan Africans waiting in Libya to set sail for Europe. They should tell them: "There is no future for you in Malta and if you come to Malta you will be stuck here for many years". That way, hopefully, illegal immigrants will avoid coming to Malta.