Advert

Gatt reveals carrot and stick tactics by Israeli bidder for power station contract

Ehud Olmert tried to pressure the Maltese government.

Ehud Olmert tried to pressure the Maltese government.

Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt said today that Israeli company Bateman, one of the bidders for the power station extension contract, had both threatened and offered incentives to the government in order to win the contract.

Its officials, he said, had also admitted that they had Enemalta insider information .

Speaking at a meeting of the Public Accounts Committee during which he asked a series of questions to the Auditor General, Dr Gatt said that documents presented to the Auditor showed that Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi even refused to take a phone call from former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who wanted to promote the Israeli bid.

Dr Gatt said that while Bateman had accused BWSC of unlawful political assistance and insider information, he knew that evidence given before the National Audit office showed that it was actually Bateman which had resorted to such tactics.

Documents given to the Auditor by Edgar Galea Curmi, an official at the Office of the Prime Minister, showed that at a meeting between the Prime Minister and the Israeli Ambassador, the latter warned Dr Gonzi that "the issue is going to embarrass the Maltese government as the Malta Labour Party has good contacts with the Hutney Bateman consortium and has all thed etails of the tender."

The ambassador also claimed that at meeting with Joseph Muscat, the issue had been raised at the request of Dr Muscat.

Dr Gatt said the words used by the Israeli ambassador to the prime minister showed clearly that Bateman had used this diplomat to send a message to Dr Gonzi.

Dr Gatt said said that later, former Israeli ambassador Ehud Olmert, himself involved in corruption cases, had phoned Dr Gonzi and asked to speak to him about the bid.

Dr Gonzi refused the call, arguing, as he had done with the ambassador, that politicians did not get involved in tendering procedures.

Dr Gatt said the representative of Bateman then had a meeting in Brussels with Richard Cachia Caruana, Malta's representative to the EU where he presented him a 'political brief'. He also contacted MEPs Simon Busuttil and David Casa.

Documents given to the auditor by Mr Cachia Caruana showed that at his meeting in Brussels, the Bateman representative, Mr Siesler, warned that the company would resort to the press. He told Mr Cachia Caruana that a director of Bateman was a former minister and bank director who had close contacts with the then Israeli finance minister and could therefore facilitate a double taxation avoidance agreement with Malta.

This carrot, Dr Gatt said, had been offered after many Israeli refusals to Maltese requests for such an agreement.

This, Dr Gatts said, was yet another example of undue political interference.

In his documents to the auditor, Mr Cachia Caruana had also reported that Mr Siesler also claimed to having access to internal Enemalta correspondence, Dr Gatt said.

This admission of insider information was further reinforced when the Bateman lawyer wrote to the prime minister, just 10 days after the bids closed, where he indicated that he already knew of a report which included the company among the shortlisted bidders.

Dr Gatt complained that while the Auditor-General's report said that it found no evidence of any BWSC involvement in insider information or undue political interference, the report did not make clear how this existed in the case of Bateman.

Labour MP Evarist Bartolo said if the pressure made by Bateman was as described by Dr Gatt - and he had no reason to doubt him - then he wanted to condemn it.

Such behaviour, he said was unacceptable and the PL condemned any such political interference and threats.

If the ambassador said that there were good contacts between Bateman and the PL, this was a blatant lie. It was also not true that there were phone calls between Labour MPs and people in Israel.

Advert

26 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

jbusuttil

Dec 1st 2010, 11:15

Mike Maqri from your writing you seem stunned and let me tell you why because the question is if the Israelis promised a double taxation agreement to the government of Malta than what did they promised to Joseph Muscat for a helping hand they surely they must have promised something? They must have promised something big as Joseph would not have been beating about the BWSC for all these months. That is why the people out there are stunned this morning as the truth is immerging about all these BWSC accusations.

Joe Micallef

Dec 1st 2010, 11:21

Your anger speaks volumes!

“Dr. Muscat`s new and `fine` political abilities” - you mean fine in the sense of practically invisible!

Forget political analysis and go fishing or to some anger management classes.

Mike Magri

Dec 2nd 2010, 07:30

@..J.Busuttil.. The truth, and the whole truth, will ONLY come out if Tranter, Spiteri Gingell and Mizzi, will be let to go to testify in front of the PAC, and most of all, MANAGE TO REMEMBER ALL they should say about this dirty contract..

@.. Joe Micallef.."..Your anger speaks volumes!.." and the rest...!! I guess that you must have been looking at a mirror when you said that, right...!

NIKKUMPATIKOM............!!!

Tony Gatt

Dec 1st 2010, 09:35

Mr. Borg, your comments are contradictory. Are you in favour of transparency and information? Or do you prefer covering things up for what you deem to be the good of Malta's relations with Israel?

Frankly such comments not only show a confused political assessment on your part, but more importantly naivety regarding International Relations with the State of Israel. Do you think it is in our interest to engage with Israel on the basis of submission? If our dear laet Guido de Marco were to hear your comments he would surely have something to say!

A.J.Borg

Dec 1st 2010, 12:00

You are SO naïve my friend.

Leave God out of all this. He's probably cracking jokes about you anyway.

J.Saliba

Dec 1st 2010, 09:32

Mr Joseph Cachia I believe you are a very good PL apologist. Very cool and calm... TODAY.

j.saliba

Dec 1st 2010, 09:42

Then.. Well done!..Hon. Dr. Austin Gatt

Advert
Advert