Advert

Updated: Woman dies in Coast Road crash

Updated: Adds video, details -

An 18-year-old woman died this morning when the car she was travelling in crashed onto the rocks on the Coast Road at Bahar Ic-Caghaq.

The accident happened at about 5 a.m. as the Opel Corsa was being driven towards Qawra.

The car left the road after hitting a road sign and crashed onto the rocks.

A man who was driving the car was injured and rushed to hospital.

The police said the car was driven by a 22-year-old from Naxxar. The woman was from St Paul's Bay.

A magisterial inquiry is under way.

Advert

93 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

sandro pace

Nov 29th 2010, 20:08

Yes you have. Dont drink beyond the reasonable. And drive reasonably anyhow. We live in a free market. No one can force prices on taximen, some say unfortunately. But that's besides the point. Still, it doesnt gives you any excuses. Youths or no, there are people whose narrow-minded aim on saturday nights, if not in life, is to say 'sirt dahna' jew patata. Thinking that they have the right to become so, and drive back home by whatever mental capabilities they have remained, cause taxis are expensive. Govt. should work on enforcement, not on paroles, leniencies and all that crap. Which gives the wrong messages.

S Saliba

Nov 29th 2010, 22:04

JBugeja if taxis were cheap and we all used them, then we would all be riding in overspeeding high-powered cars being driven recklessly and dangerously.

Pierre Mangion

Nov 29th 2010, 00:46

In full agreement of J Camilleri. All this nonsense does not but add futher grief to family and this youngster. Instead of airing comments following a tragedy, we should all think and raise public awareness during our daily lives with the hope that such tragedies don't happen again.

Dion Borg

Nov 29th 2010, 12:57

..coming from Paceville,5.00 am..?..the car ended 200m from the road,you don't have to be a rocket scientist to work this one out Mr Camilleri...there's no discipline and respect for each other on our roads..thank God there was no one coming the opposite direction cause it would have been a bigger tragedy...I myself think Police should monitor the roads out of Paceville between 3.00 and 6.00 am and I bet you that it will avoid accidents like these..because the drink-driving law is simply ignored by most drivers.

Peter Korsten

Nov 29th 2010, 08:29

IF it comes to court, you mean. You're already presuming that the magisterial inquiry will find enough grounds to prosecute the driver.

The only thing I can say is that the Coast Road is one of the worst laid out on the island and I avoid it like the plague. Curves banking in the wrong direction is just one of the many faults of this road.

GiovDeMartino

Nov 28th 2010, 13:06

U IDDAHHAQNIEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joseph Galea

Nov 28th 2010, 12:14

Life is whatever you make it, so make it a good one.

C Cassar

Nov 27th 2010, 18:55

only 3% of accidents in the UK are caused primarily by excessive speeding:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1061808/Speeding-drivers-cause-3-car-accidents-figures-reveal.html

Hank Williams

Nov 27th 2010, 19:02

Sure, can you really see the Malta Police to take any of the THREE mobile (laser) speed camera's --which they have since 2000, but appearenlty not use any more [!!!??] to the 'favur' of the 2nd grade fixed radar speed cam's, installed by KDM and his friend of the LCA - in the night between 1 and 6AM when most 'drink and drive' accident happen??? And what about mobile ALCO-tests in that part of the night? The recently ammended law gives them the Legal tool and they have selected a supplier for the testers; but dare the Gov./politicians give them the budget and allow rhem to enforce the LAW??? Happy (binge) hoidays!

Joseph Vassallo

Nov 27th 2010, 20:30

When/where did you ever see a mobile speed camera at 5 o'clock on a winter's morning?

Abigail Attardd

Nov 28th 2010, 09:43

I agree with what u wrote...i live near the Birkirkara bypass....that road has about 3 speeding cameras if im not going wrong but some people really are in a hurry to get wherever they want to be! They like to speed up more when they are just about near Mater Dei..a women almost caused me an accident not too long ago....when atleast she stopped to see whats up i told her my toughts exactly and she went off almost faster then before she stopped...people need to be carefull on the roads its not just theire life but the people in the car with them and the people outside...my toughts go to the family may this young lady rest in peace and may god give some comfort to her family

Suzy Galea

Nov 27th 2010, 16:21

Jiena nahseb qabel ma nikkumentaw fu in nies ahjar naraw ahna kif insuqu mhux niggudikaw lil haddihor!! Bla ebda dubju awn hafna nies li jsuqu bladdocc pero ma tistax tajd li kull min kellu accident u wegga xi had li kien ed isuq bladocc. Huma biss jafu x gara dak il hin!!!

Kondoljanzi lil familja tat tfajla.

Hope a speedy recovery lil guvni.

Flanders

Nov 27th 2010, 16:58

Bad drivers + Slow speeds doesn't kill people
Bad drivers + Bad roads doesn't kill people
Bad drivers + high speeds kills people... therefore overspeeding does kill people...

A. Schembri

Nov 27th 2010, 17:19

I would love to agree with you that spped does not kill people, however you might reconsider...
The faster the speed the bigger the mess...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmMNcOWhjWM

jean micallef

Nov 27th 2010, 17:26

One decent comment. I am 100% with you on this one.

God bless her soul.

J Camilleri

Nov 27th 2010, 12:51

Still they won't remain hidden after the first few fines are dashed out. Even if we have our roads full of speed cameras drivers will still eventually find the space to speed up.

Education about responsible driving including for the older generation drivers is the key for safeness in our roads. Furthermore, in this particular case how did you deduct that the driver was over speeding? Like many of you here after every accident you don't know the facts and immediately go ponder about speed cameras, over speeding, etc... Maybe his car overturned on spilled oil.

So tell me how do you know?

However, I do agree with you that for repeated offences a car and drivers license should be confiscated.

wally vella-zarb

Nov 27th 2010, 13:52

For once I agree with you. I would have any car that is involved in a fatality that is caused through overspeeding not only confiscated but crushed, irrespective of its value. Furthermore, to drive the point home, I would have the driver responsible for the accident push the operating button on the crusher himself.

Joe Busuttil

Nov 27th 2010, 15:53

I think that hidden speed cameras are idiotic, as they are only money making gizmos. The real solution is to have more roadside checks to see whether drivers are fit to drive (even if they are sleepy, not necessarily drunk) this accident happened at 5.00 a.m. Possibly this person wasn't even driving that fast, cos at 40km/h you can simply go off a pavement and run off the road, especially the Coast Road which has seen more cars falling off of it for ages. The sad thing is the tragic loss of life, and the unfortunate driver, who will now have to face Court proceedings over manslaughter and worse still, live with the remorse of having killed a young girl. Heartfelt thoughts go to the family of the girl, and to that of the boy as well

dion borg

Nov 29th 2010, 13:34

..definitely you don't know what you're talking about and have no clue of the highway code Mr DeMartino..it's against the EU laws to put a "hidden" speed camera,you have to warn the driver to be aware that it is an accident spot or of any other dangers..and confiscating the driving licence makes more sense rather than the car !!...not sure if you drive yourself after the comments you've put on here..and yes bad road surfaces and lack of road markings lead to such accidents..

L Vella

Nov 27th 2010, 12:17

I agree with you 100%. If we just look at the number of atrocious accidents that occur in Italy especially during the weekends, it is evident that speed (sometimes accompanied by drugs and alcohol) are the main culprits of the loss of life. They cannot blame the roads like we do because the roads where these accidents happen are smooth, straight highways. And this is my point - good, long roads 'invite' you to speed (hence the reason for speed cameras on such roads). Accidents beyond the driver's control can still happen even if the road is in good condition (car failure, weather conditions, animals etc) BUT the faster you are driving the higher the impact and the greater the danger of you or third parties being hurt more badly. There is only one equation in all of this SPEED KILLS!

gilbert scicluna

Nov 27th 2010, 21:04

Agree with Mark Mercieca. And what about barriers along all the road? These could even be installed along the middle of the road before someone decides to take a form of action. I frequently make use of this road, being in early morning, afternoons and night since I work in paceville on shift basis. It's all a matter of cowboy driving especially during the night. It's been now long ago since I last met a road-block, so why these have been stopped? And maybe the mobile squad shall be doing frequent spot checks!

N.Cutajar

Nov 27th 2010, 11:01

Great, that's just what we need, more obstacles driving at 45kph in the middle of the road.

sandro pace

Nov 27th 2010, 11:51

I think Mr. Magro was referring to the coast road, which is a sensible speed to drive at there.
If anyone find it unreasonable, he should not be driving.

Other than that, at 60 kph, you arrive anywhere on the island in half an hour at most.

Jimmy Magro

Nov 27th 2010, 12:58

@NCutajar
I am making a recommendation to the authorities to give the Medal of Truth of Interpretation. Why? Because I never said on all roads: I was only referring to the coast road and secondly I did not say ion the middle of the road.
Plse go to nuna school to learn how to read first.

Anabel Mifsud

Nov 27th 2010, 13:50

I agree Mr Magro but what if you're driving at 45 but someone else..either because of overspeeding, overtaking, or for whatever any other reason in this world ends up crashing in your car head on ...in THAT case does your speeding at 45 , 10 or 100 makes a difference? NO so yes somethings must be done in this road... crash barries the least...

A lot of third parties get injured or even killed in this road...and that s unacaptable

clive borg

Nov 27th 2010, 10:10

i think you have to correct one thing, not the road of death but the SPEED TO DEATH... just take a look at the video and try to determine how far the car is from the road and try to determine which one of the above make most sense!

May she rest in peace and the driver get well soon...

Alex Vella

Nov 27th 2010, 12:28

The answer is YES Chrisie my son. DEAD RIGHT

patrick zammit

Nov 27th 2010, 09:15

A cocktail of alcohol and speed is more lethal!

Christopher Micallef

Nov 27th 2010, 11:21

Uncontrolled speed kills! You're surely not suggesting driving in every outskirts main road at 40kmh are you?

Andrew Cahcia

Nov 27th 2010, 08:45

Dear Sir, Safety cameras in Malta, unlike those in the rest of the civilised world, are not safety camera but tax trap cameras. All of them. The most obvious one is on the Birkirkara Bypass westbound. The appropiate placing for this particular camera would have been before and not after the bend, seriously suspecting or assuming that the individuals, or individual, who took such a decision are dishonest or incompetent. or an absolute imbeciles and nitwits

Anthony Debono

Nov 27th 2010, 09:13

@Bajada S If you are a driver, you are well aware that a considerable number of drivers slow down their cars to the legal limit prior to passing by the speed camera, then speed off again to their former speed once out of the camera's range. Just by adding more cameras increases such instances. By fitting crash barriers, you are only protecting what's behind the crash barrier, in this case, the pavement and the rocks! As soon as you hit the crash barrier, the accident would already have happened. So crash barriers do NOT avoid accidents but protect their innards. What needs to be done, IMHO, is more awareness campaigns, introduce a points system that would eventually lead to license suspension and maybe life suspension for repeated offenders; more use of the breathalyser in certain hours of the day/night and locations; skyhigh insurance premiums for offenders; and the list goes on... @ALL One can easily comment, just as I'm doing, on such sad accidents, but we cannot pinpoint whose fault it is, etc. as we do NOT know the CAUSE of the accident in a 4-sentenced report.

E. Vassallo

Nov 27th 2010, 10:03

Although this is not the moment to argue in this moment of grief for the girl's family, I have to admit I have to agree with you. I think the police have to step up their effort against bully drivers. I think the traffic police do a good job but I don't think it's the same for those stationed in the police stations.

maria galea

Nov 27th 2010, 10:08

It is US civilians who needs to start driving decently..

have you ever been abroad and drove on motorways, especially at night?!!! if not i'll tell you....i lived abroad and you know what?!!! motorways some of them DON'T have lights, people are driving like mad people as if you are in a civil race...and it's very rare to hear about an accident on a motor way. you know why??? because people although everyone is driving with excessive speed everyone uses indicators (here in malta it seems that they come optional with the car), nobody uses the bright. and everyone uses the lanes as it should..... here in malta fast lane does not exist. you see people driving on a by pass, on the fast lane with 50km/h.......if you should blame someone blame US civilians... not the authorities

jscerri

Nov 27th 2010, 10:17

well said Andrew, i use this road on a weekday night. Back when there was no camera i used to speed up as soon as I pass near university and keep on going at a sustained speed except at the roundabouts and this bend. now with the camera i do exactly the same! since a bend will not let you drive at an excessive speed. On the other hand whoever took the decision to place the camera where it is may have made the decision on statistics of accidents in the bypass.

G. Grech

Nov 27th 2010, 11:04

Cameras ?? They might solve some people's financial problems, but not decrease road fatal accidents.

Anthony Debono

Nov 27th 2010, 11:05

@Bajada S

If you are a driver, you are well aware that a considerable number of drivers slow down their cars to the legal limit prior to passing by the speed camera, then speed off again to their former speed once out of the camera's range. Just by adding more cameras increases such instances.

By fitting crash barriers, you are only protecting what's behind the crash barrier, in this case, the pavement and the rocks! As soon as you hit the crash barrier, the accident would already have happened. So crash barriers do NOT avoid accidents but protect their innards.

What needs to be done, IMHO, is more awareness campaigns, introduce a points system that would eventually lead to license suspension and maybe life suspension for repeated offenders; more use of the breathalyser in certain hours of the day/night and locations; skyhigh insurance premiums for offenders; and the list goes on and on...

@ALL
One can easily comment, just as I'm doing, on such sad accidents, but we cannot pinpoint whose fault it is, etc. as we do NOT know the CAUSE of the accident in a 4-sentenced report.

C Cassar

Nov 27th 2010, 11:47

@maria galea: You seem to be a typical Maltese driver using terms such as the "fast lane". Well, the "fast lane" doesn't exist in any country, not even Malta. Except for the inner lane, all other lanes (whether 2nd, 3rd or 4th lane) are overtaking lanes and you should only be in these lanes to overtake another vehicle. After you have overtaken, you should move back into lane 1 (inner lane).

Regarding no lighting on motorways, so what? All countries except Belgium have unlit motorways aoutside of urban areas and most people have no issue with this. I also disagree that everyone is speeding on these unlit roads. Most limits are 130kph, which seems like speeding to anyone from Malta because they simply aren't used to this speed, esapcially for several hours at a time.

I suggest all Maltese taking driving lessons should also be forced to take some abroad (at their own expense) in order to learn proper driving skills. Better to make people spend more money on getting more vital skills than continuing driving to the standard that ends up in an accident so common in Malta like this.

James Coleiro

Nov 27th 2010, 13:33

Andrew Cachia, the only people that are against speed cameras are the ones that don't like any form of control while driving, so that they can speed as much as they like. If this were not so, you would not be complaining against them. Another thing. Re: B'Kara Bypass speed camera on the bend. I have another explanation. The camera was placed on the bend so that drivers will slow down before the bend (and don't tell me that all drivers would do that if a camera was not there), and then by the time they are clear of the camera, they are already on the straight bit driving slowly of course (ghax bilfors) and then they don't have enough road to accelerate and overspeed very much as the roundabout is already in sight and getting nearer. If there was no camera, drivers like you would probably go around the bend at 80km/h and then accelerate even to a 100 or more on the straight. Now tell me I'm wrong.

Andrew Cachia

Nov 27th 2010, 16:39

JamesI i never said I was against safety cameras but against trick trap tax cameras. Safety cameras are always installed and positioned before a bend and not after.

James Coleiro

Nov 27th 2010, 22:52

Andrew, the fact remains that if you always drive within the legal speed limits, the things you choose to call "trick trap tax cameras" would not affect you in the least, bend or no bend. People who are against them, don't like to drive within the legal speed limits. Mobile speed cameras, placed at random would solve the overspeeding problem. I would introduce a system where one's driving licence is suspended for a length of time proportional to how much he is caught driving over the legal speed limit. E.g. legal speed limit is 60km/h. You are caught driving at 65km/h, you get 5 weeks of licence suspension. You're caught driving at 70km/h, 10 weeks suspension. And who is caught driving again while his licence is suspended, double the period of suspension. Caught again, a prison sentence. Then you'll see what careful driving we'd have !!

Advert
Advert