Non-registered NGOs will still get l-Istrina funds - President
President George Abela denied today that NGOs which were not registered with the Voluntary Organisations Commissioner would not benefit from l-Istrina funds.
He said that all those organisations which applied for assistance, including Church organisations and others which were not registered, would still benefit from l-Istrina funds, in the same way as they had done in 2009.
The beneficiaries will be announced before the event is held.
The Times reported earlier this week that Church organisations, including Caritas, which have refused to enrol with the Voluntary Organisations Commissioner, may not be eligible to receive funds from this year’s annual charity telethon l-Istrina unless they join in the coming weeks.
This is because the President’s charity that organises the event – the Malta Community Chest Fund – has been recognised as a state entity, meaning it can now only donate money to enrolled NGOs.
NGOs Commissioner Kenneth Wain says this is stipulated in the Voluntary Organisations Act, enacted in 2007, to ensure transparency and accountability.
Prof. Wain had raised the issue of the legal status of the MCCF last year, arguing that as a non enrolled organisation it was illegal for it to receive benefits from the government such as free airtime from state television. Since then, the MCCF insisted it should be recognised as a government entity, according to Prof. Wain. He says this spells the end of his involvement in the issue. But while this may resolve last year’s controversy, other problems have now arisen due to the new status of the MCCF.
As the law stands, state organisations can help each other, meaning the MCCF can now receive free or subsidised airtime from Public Broadcasting Services, another state entity.
But state f unds cannot be given to non-enrolled organisations and more than a third of the organisations which benefitted from last year’s L-Istrina were not enrolled, something Prof. Wain let slide since the status of MCCF was still being negotiated.
The Church has never publicly explained what is holding it from enrolling its organisations.
When questioned last year, the Curia said it was in talks with the Office of the Prime Minister and the NGOs Commissioner’s legal adviser about the issue. Asked recently if the Church had settled the issue, a spokesman said that although there had been “further exchange of proposals”, the matter “is still not finalised”.
When asked, Prof. Wain said the situation with Church organisations had not been resolved.
It will therefore still be illegal for PBS to give free airtime to an end-ofyear telethon organised by nonenrolled organisation Dartal-Providenza, another issue which raised controversy last year.
Last year’s controversy did not seem to perturb ordinary people, who believe the benefits of such telethons override this legal dilemma. But NGOs, which painstakingly brought themselves in line with the law, were angry it was now being ignored by the biggest organisations that should be setting an example.
They were particularly angry because eligibility for state funds is one of the main incentives for organisations to enrol.
Prof. Wain said he “respects and recognises” the MCCF’s decision not to enrol as a voluntary organisation and, therefore, remain “not independent and autonomous of the government”.
Having come under heavy fire from the Office of the President last year, he insisted he had no wish to detract from “the excellent efforts of L-Istrina to collect money for the needy.”
“Following the unfortunate outcome of the debate last year, I think the proper application of the Voluntary Organisations Act is the responsibility of the government, which enacted the law, and not of the Commissioner who has no powers in this regard other than to make recommendations on the better operation and development of the law in support of the voluntary sector, which, of course, he will continue to do to the best of his abilities,” Prof. Wain said.
In his annual report published a few months ago, Prof. Wain pointed out that 30 per cent of direct government grants last year went to one major nonenrolled Church organisation and about 12.5 per cent were distributed to various other nonenrolled Church organisations.
“This is not, evidently, a situation that can continue into 2010,” he said, adding: “This situation with the Church organisations and the MCCF is harmful to the future of the voluntary sector as a whole and requires quick resolution.”
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
VINCENT BORG
Nov 23rd 2010, 19:38
This controversy is senseless and will only serve to do harm. The Commissioner needs to realise that his stand will do no good to the NGO's cause and is confusing the minds of the many generous donors. He should reconsider his position. What is needed to ensure transparency and good practices in fund raising is simply an official registry of audited accounts of NGOs that raise funds through public fund raising activities. The Commission should work to facilitate the compilation of such a register and ensure that it is accessible to the general public. NGOs should only be encouraged to register their audited accouts and it should not be compulsory. After all it is up to the donor to decide which NGO to help. When it comes to distributing Government funds or free use of public facilities for fund raising, as far as I know the practice is, and if not it should be, that such benefits are allocated after considering project proposals which include (or should include) the audited accounts of the NGO concerned .
Paul Caruana
Nov 23rd 2010, 17:37
This is so typical of the maltese way of doing things; we enact a law, and even at its inception, some people assume that they have some divine right to ignore it! If we do not want to follow a law of the land because of some percieved moral superiority over the rest of the population fine, but at the very least, government should avoid making an ass of itself, passing laws and then giving some sectors of society the right to ignore them. As ever, we are weak with the strong and strong with the weak. So much for equality under the law!
Tony Gatt
Nov 23rd 2010, 15:23
The whole reason the regulations were enacted was to create traceability of funds and ensure that certain basic safeguards are in place to ensure maximal usage of the funding. While I do not doubt the sterling work of a number of Church-run NGOs, I do doubt the Church's motivations for keeping such NGOs out of the register. The law should be applied and the President should realise that it is not his place to decide who gets the funds, even at the cost of breaking the law!!
M Aquilina
Nov 23rd 2010, 15:14
So why were we NGO's asked to register in the first place? What is the VO Act for? Why was the VO Commisioner enrolled when we knew he had no power what so ever? This is total gimmick.
J.Tonna
Nov 23rd 2010, 16:55
Mr Aquilina - we are talking about a Commissioner for NGO's and not for the whole of Malta.