Advert

Church organisations risk losing l-Istrina funds

Several Church organisations, including Caritas, which have refused to enrol with the Voluntary Organisations Commissioner, may not be eligible to receive funds from this year’s annual charity telethon l-Istrina unless they join in the coming weeks.

This is because the President’s charity that organises the event – the Malta Community Chest Fund – has been recognised as a state entity, meaning it can now only donate money to enrolled NGOs.

NGOs Commissioner Kenneth Wain says this is stipulated in the Voluntary Organisations Act, enacted in 2007, to ensure transparency and accountability.

Prof. Wain had raised the issue of the legal status of the MCCF last year, arguing that as a non enrolled organisation it was illegal for it to receive benefits from the government such as free airtime from state television. Since then, the MCCF insisted it should be recognised as a government entity, according to Prof. Wain. He says this spells the end of his involvement in the issue. But while this may resolve last year’s controversy, other problems have now arisen due to the new status of the MCCF.

As the law stands, state organisations can help each other, meaning the MCCF can now receive free or subsidised airtime from Public Broadcasting Services, another state entity.

But state f unds cannot be given to non-enrolled organisations and more than a third of the organisations which benefitted from last year’s L-Istrina were not enrolled, something Prof. Wain let slide since the status of MCCF was still being negotiated.

The Church has never publicly explained what is holding it from enrolling its organisations.

When questioned last year, the Curia said it was in talks with the Office of the Prime Minister and the NGOs Commissioner’s legal adviser about the issue. Asked recently if the Church had settled the issue, a spokesman said that although there had been “further exchange of proposals”, the matter “is still not finalised”.

When asked, Prof. Wain said the situation with Church organisations had not been resolved.

It will therefore still be illegal for PBS to give free airtime to an end-ofyear telethon organised by nonenrolled organisation Dartal-Providenza, another issue which raised controversy last year.

Last year’s controversy did not seem to perturb ordinary people, who believe the benefits of such telethons override this legal dilemma. But NGOs, which painstakingly brought themselves in line with the law, were angry it was now being ignored by the biggest organisations that should be setting an example.

They were particularly angry because eligibility for state funds is one of the main incentives for organisations to enrol.

Prof. Wain said he “respects and recognises” the MCCF’s decision not to enrol as a voluntary organisation and, therefore, remain “not independent and autonomous of the government”.

Having come under heavy fire from the Office of the President last year, he insisted he had no wish to detract from “the excellent efforts of L-Istrina to collect money for the needy.”

“Following the unfortunate outcome of the debate last year, I think the proper application of the Voluntary Organisations Act is the responsibility of the government, which enacted the law, and not of the Commissioner who has no powers in this regard other than to make recommendations on the better operation and development of the law in support of the voluntary sector, which, of course, he will continue to do to the best of his abilities,” Prof. Wain said.

In his annual report published a few months ago, Prof. Wain pointed out that 30 per cent of direct government grants last year went to one major nonenrolled Church organisation and about 12.5 per cent were distributed to various other nonenrolled Church organisations.

“This is not, evidently, a situation that can continue into 2010,” he said, adding: “This situation with the Church organisations and the MCCF is harmful to the future of the voluntary sector as a whole and requires quick resolution.”

The MCCF has not yet replied to questions sent last Wednesday about its legal status and the fresh dilemmas this brings with it.

Advert

39 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Oscar Cassar

Nov 22nd 2010, 22:18

Mela fil-kas certu maratoni ghandho jkunu mxandra biss fuq l-RTK. Il-ligi qeda hemm biex tipreveni mill-abbus u nafu li kien hawn abbus minn ghaqdiet.

Minn naha l-ohra, jekk il-fondi gejjin bir-rieda tal-istat, huwa ovja li dawn jridu jintafqu f'linja gwida mal-politika tal-Istat. Ezempju ta' dan hija issues ta 'Development' u 'Sex Education' re access u edukazzjoni dwar Condoms ecc. Jekk certu NGOs ma jaqblux ma dan, jisghu liberament ma jitolbu l-ebda forma ta sosten minn l-Istatt. Biss l-Istat hu sovran u dan ma jistax jawweg il-ligijiet skond min jkun il-klijent.

J Farrugia

Nov 23rd 2010, 17:43

oscar taqax ghac-cajt. Ahna kattolici u niftahru li ahna kattolici u rridu li l-istat jimxi mal-volonta' tal-kattolici skond il-kostituzzjoni ta' Malta. Ghax finalment kull poter serju huwa mmexxi minn moralita' u kuxjenza tajba. Kien hawn zmien meta l-gvern bhala stat kien jinghaqad kontra kull moralita' ma' kriminali organizzati u nies innocenti jispiccaw korruti jew maqtula. Dak kien stat dizonest u nittamaw li qatt f'pajjizna ma naraw iktar bhalhu. Niftahru li pajjizna huwa wiehed civili, demokratiku u mmexxi b'mod li jirrispetta x-xewqat tal-maggoranza waqt li jirrispetta wkoll il-minoranzi; IMMA li jwettaq dak li tiddeciedi l-maggoranza tal-poplu .... ghat-tajjeb jew ghal hazin. Imma kull setgha gejja minn Alla u kull stat jaf x'inhu tajjeb u x'mhux tajjeb ghac-cittadini tieghu. Ezempju: l-istat jaf li jekk qatt xi darba jaccetta l-fatt li familja tista tkun maghmula minn zewgt irgiel ikun qed jikkommetti azzjoni moralment u anke civilment hazina u ta' min jistmerra u ta' dannu ghall-istess poplu. Filwaqt illi huwa dover ta' kull stat li jmexxi 'l quddiem l-interessi tal-familja vera u li jara li din tkun b;sahhitha ghax familja mkissra tfisser stat imkisser u mahmug.

Oscar Cassar

Nov 23rd 2010, 19:55

@ J Farrugia Filwaqt li ma nistax nifem il-konnessjoni tieghek bejn il-familja u l-NGO, nixtieq nistaqsi, ghalik xi tfisser familja mkisra. Jekk hix dik li titkisser wara tradiment, vjolenza domestika ecc u li tasal ghas-separazzjoni jew ukoll dik li wara zminijiet koroh tnejn min nies jinghaqdu u jkolloh opportunita ohra f'hajjithom ? Dan l-istat kien ukoll jarresta fuq ragunijiet 'Immorali' lil nies omoseswali. Bhekk ser nergaw immorru lura? Jien li naf hu li l-Knisja Maltija tipriedka hafna fuq il-valur tal-persuna u l-imhabba izda ghandi dubju kemm il-Knisja timpjega (fl-iskejjel ecc li jiehdu fondi minn l-Istat) nies ta religjonijiet ohra jew tal-anqas nies li jaghdu minn certu problemi domestici (familja). Jien ghalija dan huwa sempliciment diskriminazzjoni u nuqqas ta karita minn istituzzjoni li imbghat tipretendi li tibbenefika minn fondi pubblici.

Marcel Dingli

Nov 22nd 2010, 14:27

When one gives, one gives, and it is meant to be from the heart. Those who give from the heart dont account.

I. Cilia

Nov 22nd 2010, 14:45

@Marcel Dingli

eh prosit ghalik kemm int bravu!!!

so you are implying that you do not have the right to request where your donation that you gave from heart ended up... because you gave it from the heart in the first place!!!

get real please..

of course you donate from the heart!!! but you have the right to know that it is being used for a good cause!!! lanqas li ma kienx hemm allegazzjonijiet fil passat ta bad use of donations!!!

david calleja

Nov 22nd 2010, 15:19

@ Marcel Dingli
Sorry i don't follow your line of thought - so a generous person/s - population, is not entitled to have an accounting of how millions of donated euros are spent / used / invested etc???.
Why on earth not ?... what has being generous and giving got to do with not asking for accounting...
we pay taxes (true not from the heart) - but we expect accountability...don't we??

J.Tonna

Nov 22nd 2010, 16:13

I do not want to see a government commissioners check the Church. I have full confidence in the Church's entities, but not in certain, so called, government officials.

If we are not assured that the Church entities will be helped with our donations we will have no option but to give our donation directly to the Church and do not expect outsiders to intervene.

I. Cilia

Nov 22nd 2010, 18:21

Mr Tonna, while of course everyone may believe what he wishes and acts accordingly, I myself would prefer to have a check on where my donations are going. Now be it a government auditor, a church auditor, whoever really, I want to ensure that my donations are going to those charities that really need them. Mhux per ezempju ha nsemmi kaz bla sens... i donate to the church hoping they are passed on to orphanages or entities like Dar tal Provvidenza and end up being used to buy a new fixture for the church such as a new damask or something feast related... that to me is waste of money because personally it means nothing to me.... knowing that my donation, however little it may be goes to a good cause... while i have nothing against the church organisations, definitely not, the fact that they do not want to join the Voluntary commissioner makes me think twice... then again, each one I think is free to decide what his conscience tells him.

J.Tonna

Nov 22nd 2010, 21:01

Mr Cilia - We never heard of a case where donations for institutions were used for church embellishments. Moreso the other way round, I heard ofd a case where a person wanted to make a new statue in his parish church but the parish priest persuaded him to give the money to an institute in the same parish, which he did.

On the other hand, as there might be some doubtfuls the Church itself might order a private and indipendent auditor to check all incomes and expenses in each parish.

Marcel Dingli

Nov 22nd 2010, 14:08

You donate where you like, i donate where i like.

Marcel Dingli

Nov 22nd 2010, 14:13

Seems quite a few wont be benefiting. Do you know how to read ?

J.Tonna

Nov 22nd 2010, 12:04

I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU. I DONATE ALL THE YEAR ROUND ACCORDING TO MY MEANS. I KNOW WELL TO WHOM I SHOULD DONATE.

Oscar Cassar

Nov 22nd 2010, 22:23

Profs Waine qijad jimxi mal-ligi li ghamel il-legislatur u li ma jistax jinterpreta b'modi differenti skond min tkun l-NGO. Din il-ligi sarer biex ma jkunx hawn min aktar jabbuza taht l-isem tal-Volontarjat u darba saret il-ligi (fl-ahhar) din ghanda tkun ghal kulhadd l-istess. Min imbghad ma jridx jimxi mar-regoli tal-loghba jista ma jilabx.

Advert
Advert