Obscene inversion of a human right
In a number of ways, ours is an age of glaring, provocative obscenities and diabolic laws. Societies unashamedly approve and grant as (in)human right to selfish females the inflicting of a horrendous termination of life on a helpless foetus, often...
In a number of ways, ours is an age of glaring, provocative obscenities and diabolic laws.
Societies unashamedly approve and grant as (in)human right to selfish females the inflicting of a horrendous termination of life on a helpless foetus, often introduced to this world by an act of the conceiver motivated by lust.
Inversely, the most supreme of human rights – that of living, developing and prospering – is obscenely, high-handedly denied the helpless, tiny victim with a potential of developing into a top-notch contributor to society and civilisation.
The milk of human kindness has truly dried up over the years and it is already late in the day to move the cow to pastures new and productive thus normalising the flow again to the benefit of mankind’s health and survival.
Legislating as a human right the slaughter of an incipient human life while denying an (incomparably) and infinitely more merited human right – that of protection and right to life of the tiny victim – is an absolutely unacceptable and insufferable legal discrimination, clearly the product of warped and devious brains.