Christian fidelity – a thorough subject indeed
I found wholesome in great part the editorial Clear Advice To Avoid ‘Cafeteria Catholicism’ (October 18) as well as the contribution by John A. Consiglio on the economic and moral costs of divorce. Allow me to quote in the context of the editorial’s concluding question, from Pope Benedict’s XVI recent address at Hyde Park in London during his September visit to Great Britain:
“The drama of Newman’s life invites us to examine our lives, to see them against the vast horizon of God’s plan, and to grow in communion with the Church of every time and place... to whose mission he devoted his entire life... At the end of his life, Newman would describe his life’s work as a struggle against the growing tendency to view religion as a purely private and subjective matter, a question of personal opinion.
“Here is the first lesson we can learn from his life: In our day, when an intellectual and moral relativism threatens to sap the very foundations of our society, Newman reminds us that, as men and women made in the likeness of God, we were created to know the truth, to find in that truth our ultimate freedom and the fulfillment of our deepest human aspirations...
“Newman’s life also teaches us that passion for the truth, intellectual honesty and genuine conversion are costly. The truth that sets us free cannot be kept to ourselves; it calls for testimony, it begs to be heard, and in the end its convincing power comes from itself and not from the human eloquence or arguments in which it may be couched... In our own time, the price to be paid for fidelity to the Gospel is no longer being hanged, drawn and quartered but it often involves being dismissed out of hand, ridiculed or parodied.”
And here I would like to show my support to both Labour MP Adrian Vassallo and to Mgr Arthur Said Pullicino for their principled stand for witnessing as good Catholics in the “public square” despite the flak they have been subjected to.
Benedict XVI drew this reflection on the Christian’s engagement in the “public square” at Hyde Park:
“Finally, Newman teaches us that if we have accepted the truth of Christ and committed our lives to Him, there can be no separation between what we believe and the way we live our lives... Newman understood this, and was the great champion of the prophetic office of the Christian laity.
“He saw clearly that we do not so much accept the truth in a purely intellectual act as embrace it in a spiritual dynamic that penetrates to the core of our being.. .those who live in and by the truth instinctively recognise what is false, inimical to the beauty and goodness which accompany the splendour of truth, veritatis splendor.
“No one who looks realistically at our world today could think that Christians can afford to go on with business as usual, ignoring the profound crisis of faith which has overtaken our society, or simply trusting that the patrimony of values handed down by the Christian centuries will continue to inspire and shape the future of our society... each of us, in accordance with his or her state of life, is called to work for... imbuing temporal life with the values of the Gospel... to change the world, to work for a culture of life, a culture forged by love and respect for the dignity of each human person.”
Being pragmatic and pandering to a vociferous minority which has cut its anchors to perennial values is akin to Britain’s new state-of-the-art nuclear submarine rudder failing and running aground!
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
JOSEPH ZAMMIT
Nov 3rd 2010, 19:21
For all those interested, I am writing a book called "Why I am not a catholic". In it one can read all of JZ contributions which justifies my belief of why I am not a catholic.
Carmel Said
Nov 3rd 2010, 14:12
Ibdel naqra d-diska Zammit!!!
Christopher Xuereb
Nov 3rd 2010, 10:44
The fairytale that is the Bible is your idea of values? It is well that you quote the pope who claims succession from Christ. Take a look at many of these so called successors and you'll be hard pressed to find many of them upholding the values you speak of. I am as Maltese as you are but I don't care for your religion, much less your values. If you don't want a civil court to dissolve the civil side of your marriage that's your prerogative but keep your religious superstition out of other people's business. I am divorced and live a very happy (and by your religion's definition, an adulterous) life. If there is a God, I'll take it up with him when I die.
Joe Zammit
Nov 3rd 2010, 10:28
A Catholic is Catholic always and everywhere. So discussing a topic from a civic point of view does in no way mean that a Catholic is on leave from his obligations towards God and his one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. No Catholic can ever accept evil, like divorce, in his civic arguments. After all, Christ condemns divorce always (with no exception!) for our own good.
So the religious argument strengthens the civic argument because the Catholic has Christ enlightening words to convince him or her that divorce is evil and as such is always to the detriment of society.
Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it’s already guaranteed!
Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi
Nov 3rd 2010, 16:34
If victory is guaranteed why friggin fight !
Alex Ciantar
Nov 3rd 2010, 16:46
I can't find neither God or the Devil on U-BET!!!
victor pulis
Nov 3rd 2010, 17:32
I don't expect an answer from Joe but here goes.
Why does the church accept separation which means putting asunder when Jesus himself said let no man put asunder that which God has joined together? Separation prevents the couple from becoming one flesh. And where is annullment mentioned in Jesus' teachings? As I said I'm not holding my breath for an answer. Some defenderof the faith you turned out to be Joe.