Editorial
Everything you need to know about sex
Sex should not be a dirty word because it is only when wrongly used that sex has bad consequences. Still, politicians have been scared of tackling such consequences for fear of offending social mores.
For the past 11 years, the government has been promising a national sexual health policy that would give the country a clear direction but this never materialised.
In the meantime, figures of rampant casual sex and teenage pregnancies continued to rise. Sexually transmitted infections long eradicated, such as syphilis, reached alarming rates – survey after survey confirmed the Maltese as the most careless Europeans when it came to contraception.
Much as society and parents would like to believe youngsters are not having a romp in the car when their hormones take over, patients as young as 13 have turned up for testing at the GU Clinic.
But despite this disturbing reality, the powers that be continued to bury their head in the sand, playing for time and delaying the release of the policy that, admittedly, could be controversial.
In 2008, The Times had reported that the policy would be finalised “in the coming weeks”. In 2009, the third and final version of the policy was one of the casualties of Budget 2010, leaving GU Clinic head Philip Carabot – the lone crusader of sexual health in Malta – disappointed anything would ever materialise.
In March 2010, Health Minister Joseph Cassar announced the final touches were being made to its three-year budget. This, he said, would “be done this week”, then the policy would go to Cabinet and on for public consultation. Fast forward to June and The Sunday Times again reported the policy should be delivered “in the coming weeks”.
Then, just as everybody was about to lose heart, the government allocated €200,000 in its financial estimates for Budget 2011, the first concrete sign the policy could finally be brought out of the incubator. Dr Carabot’s reaction was: “I can retire a happy man”.
Hope has been further strengthened by the Health Ministry’s commitment to give a concrete date to release the policy for public consumption by mid-November.
The sum voted in the Budget is still far off the estimated €1.5 million necessary to implement the policy but it is the first step to rolling out the blueprint for the way forward in addressing society’s sexual health effectively.
A policy will not resolve all society’s ills and cure the sexual health problems the country faces but it is crucial in giving direction and, finally, the government seems to be on the right track.
Young people have to be properly educated and provided with accessible comprehensive information on the methods available to prevent infection and pregnancy. Conservative social mores have no place in classrooms and while nobody is advocating sex, there is no point burying our head in the sand because teenage sexual activity is alive and well in Malta.
Although late, Dr Cassar has to be commended for finally declaring that sexual health has to be given its due importance.
This is an urgent matter. The latest GU Clinic report highlighted the worrying trend of unprotected sex, with just 9.6 per cent of all 2,632 patients saying they consistently used a condom and 71 per cent never having used one.
The fact that the rate of casual sex remains consistently high and condom use so low means whatever we have been teaching is clearly not working and has to be revised.
Let’s get talking about sex now!
11 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Kevin Mercieca
Oct 29th 2010, 14:30
Very good editorial! Sfera programme on favourite channel today will be discussing this topic! www.sfera.kottoner.com
Joseph Calleja
Oct 29th 2010, 13:31
Sex Education, Sex Education Sex Education. Let us be very frank on this subject. Sex is not a bad thing as a matter of fact it could be a beautiful thing when done between two consensual adults. Our parents did it and so did their parents before them. Because of the world we live in we do have to be careful. First of all we need sex education in the homes and in the schools. We need to take precautions, like using birth control pills and using condoms when possible. It is ignorant and a bit late to suggest abstinence, that ship has sailed. A sexually active woman should be able to get birth control pills at any pharmacy, same with condoms etc. If we are to avoid unwanted pregnancies and unwanted sexual diseases , which are on the rise, we have to take precautions and the government should be involved in this program. Sex education is very important and our legislators should be very involved in this program. A lot of educators, doctors and even parents endorse such a program. Prevention is the best cure. Let us catch up with the rest of the world.
Jesmond Micallef
Oct 29th 2010, 21:51
Joseph, the birth control pill is a chemical. Taken on a constant basis is suspicious to my eyes as I tend to think that it prevents or supresses the natural development of a womans body. Modern day life is literally bombarded with too much sex and I tend to think that people have to learn how to be aware of this. There is too much sex and I hope thats the same with love, though I really doubt this.
Joe Zammit
Oct 29th 2010, 11:13
Since God is love and thinks of human beings only to love him, we in our entirety, including sex, are the object of divine love. As seen in this light sex has no other end, no other meaning than love.
So sex must always be directed in accordance with God and the designs of his love for us to a triumph of love. Since sex must face the choice between the unselfish love of Christ and the egotistic enslaving lust of sinful man. The triumph of love belongs only to crucified love in union with the risen Christ.
In sex there can never be love unless sex is controlled according to its Creator, God, who is Love Itself!
Joseph Calleja
Oct 29th 2010, 13:33
Joe Zammit that ship has sailed. Welcome to the future.
Jesmond Micallef
Oct 29th 2010, 11:03
Sex is mighty. It's one of the strongest instincts human beings, as with all species have - the propagation of the species. There are byproducts to this which are health related as well as those relating to the outcome such as single parenthood, even moreso at a young and tender age. There are also other unfortunate aspects and misuse of this very strong instinct, that of prostitution and pornography. Sex education is paramount but also the way people look at sex too. The human body is beautiful but so is the mind and do wonder if these two "beauties" are given due equal importance in our educative formation but also in society. The clothes we wear, the figure or build or natural beauty reflect so much on how we present ourselves. Is there enough a drive to make people stop and think about what drives this ? We see so much sex symbols of all sorts in the advertising media. Its all around us.
Everybody wants to look beautiful, attractive and what not. Promote thinking first rather then pure instinctive drive. The meeting of the minds leads to the joys of love. Intellectual, then the sensual and then the sexual.
D Vella
Oct 29th 2010, 09:36
A condom dispenser or three at the University would be a good idea.
David Buttigieg
Oct 29th 2010, 09:56
That would be a good statement but wouldn't change much.
Education is the long term solution.
Joseph calleja
Oct 29th 2010, 18:31
Why should condoms be restricted to the University? Condoms and birth control pills etc should be available at every drugstore with no reservation. University students do not have a monopoly on sex.You cannot stop people from having sex but you can help them protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies and deadly diseases. Sex education might help.
Sean Grima
Nov 2nd 2010, 09:10
people do not normally have sex at university...they would do it in the evening or away from campus: condoms are widely availbale in entertainment outlets' restrooms, in pharmacies and even supermarkets!
Peter Shaw
Oct 29th 2010, 09:32
How can Politicians not realise that in the long run sex education can reduce the number of young single mothers and therefore reduce the social benefit expense for this category ? Why do responsible tax payers have to pay for the irresponsibility of others ?