Malta still seeking joint oil exploration
Malta is exerting diplomatic pressure on Italy and Libya to discuss its proposal for a tripartite oil exploration agreement for those areas of the Mediterranean which are being contested by the three countries.
Foreign Minister Tonio Borg told Parliament that last year he had made a joint exploration proposal to both the Italian and the Libyan governments. Malta was urging the other governments to come to the negotiating table to discuss this proposal.
He said that Malta was in favour of joint exploration because this avoided reference to the International Court of Justice and without prejudice to any presumed rights, the countries could arrive at an amicable way to exploit resources and leave the theoretical issue of sovereignty unprejudiced.
Dr Borg was answering a series of supplementary questions by Labour MP Joe Mizzi. He said that there were three contested zones to the east of Malta. One was an area contested by Malta and Libya east of the area about which the International Court took a delineation decision in 1985. There was another strip contested by Malta, Italy and Libya and another area being contested by Malta and Italy.
JOINT EXPLORATION WITH TUNISIA
In reply to the original question by Evarist Bartolo (PL) the minister said that the Joint Experts Group formed between Malta and Tunisia to identify zones where there could be joint oil exploration, had met four times between April and July of 2006. The issue was also raised in talks with the Tunisian Foreign Affairs Minister in May 2007, May 2009 and June this year – the last two meetings within the framework of the Malta-Tunisia joint commission.
After the state visit by then President Fenech Adami, Malta and Tunisia signed a declaration of intent pledging to work to start joint exploration. Talks were then started to see how this declaration could lead to a proper agreement.
Dr Borg would not go into details of the difficulties encountered in the talks with the Tunisians because, he said, he did not want to put the Maltese government at a disadvantaged position in its future dealings with oil exploration companies. He said that the contention was whether the joint exploration should be in areas contested only by Tunisia and Malta or whether it should be in other zones where third countries could have an interest.
No agreement had been reached between Malta and Tunisia on an area where joint exploration could be carried out.
There were other difficulties insofar as Malta had given a concession for oil exploration in contested zones. But, he said, these should not be an obstruction to a joint exploration agreement.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
ASpiteri
Oct 27th 2010, 11:43
Part 2
We must look into ‘new’ countries for such alliances. I know it might sounds crazy, but I would go for countries in the east; Croatia and Serbia to name a few, countries that aren’t in the EU at the moment, but wanting to. Quite understandable too, they also reserve a good dose of detestation towards any Muslim nation, they don’t have any oil themselves and what about the beauty of their women?!
A mutual bond can be built on such aspects; defense aid in return for good deals of our oil and also helping them getting into the EU, if their people really want it of course.
Then we will see, if Gaddafi will send another gunboat whilst we’re exploring for oil in our own waters!
Slim Zghal
Oct 27th 2010, 12:55
@ASpiteri: First: It's about oil exploration in areas contested by Malta's neighbours (Italy, Libya and Tunisia). That means, it's not cleared whether these areas really belong to Malta or not, and as referencing to the international court of justice could be time consuming with no positive outcome, Malta's government prefers seeking an amical solution where in areas where only 2 countries are involved (areas that 3 or even 4 countires contest are more complex to deal with).
Second: Are there any presumably maltese areas contested by Croatia and Serbia? And why define sympathy to other coutries based on their (possible) hate for a religion or the beauty of their women?? There are conflicts with Italy too (read the article once more), though they have the 'right' religion and quite good looking women.
Third: Exploration for oil does not mecessarily mean finding quantities that could justify an exploitation of such fields if any were found.
ASpiteri
Oct 27th 2010, 11:39
Part 1
This is nothing but a pure failure in our foreign policy!
We don’t need to compromise with any of our southern neighbours to explore for oil in our own rightful waters!
Before we start talking about oil exploration, we need to design a dynamic foreign policy, that isn’t limited to pathetic ceremonial state visit, but sees oil exploration at hearth of such policy. We are a defenseless nation with a small army that most of its resources are being wasted in taking care of illegal immigrants.
We must strike alliances, ideally with nations like Italy and England, whom our country has a long relationship with. However, these countries are presently ruled by people with special interests and are ready to sell their soul in order to strike a deal with Gaddafi (The Brits realised a convicted terrorist in return for a deal with BP, whilst we don’t need to mention how Berlusconi greets Gaddafi whenever they meet!)...
dvella
Oct 27th 2010, 10:26
ghalhekk qed ntuh bis sieq it turizmu!!
mma l inglizi jghidu - don't count your eggs before they hatch - sur borg!!!!
H Galea
Oct 27th 2010, 05:00
Unless agreements are reached with Italy and Tunisa NO one is allowed to explore for oil.
dvella
Oct 27th 2010, 10:27
Even though we're allowed, we simply don't have the means!!!
m vella
Oct 26th 2010, 21:30
oil is the only hope for Malta