Tuna cuts would encourage illegal catches, fishermen warn
Malta’s fishing industry has warned Brussels that fresh plans to further cut bluefin tuna catches in the Mediterranean would lead to illegal fishing.
During a meeting of EU Fisheries Ministers in Brussels on Tuesday the European Commission is expected to suggest further decreases in bluefin tuna quotas for EU fishermen for 2011.
However, this measure is expected to be resisted by a number of member states amid claims by fishermen that it would drive them out of business.
Malta has not yet taken a final position on the issue although it is expected to continue to maintain that tuna fishing should be sustainable.
According to EU sources, the commission is planning to propose to cut by more than half the quotas for next year. Quotas for 2010 are already at an all-time low due to fears that bluefin tuna stocks are close to collapse.
However, the local industry is opposing the commission’s stance and argues this proposal could mean the end of the tuna sector in Malta.
Although the commission has not yet issued a formal proposal, since it will first wait to gauge the reaction of member states, environmental lobby groups are suggesting that quotas for 2011 should fall to 6,000 tonnes from the 13,500 tonnes permitted in 2010 and shared among all the EU member states which fish this species.
Maltese fishermen have already seen their annual tuna quotas slashed, from 344 tonnes in 2008 to 161 tonnes this year. A further cut like the one being touted in Brussels would mean Maltese fishermen will remain with a quota of 71 tonnes this year, which according to the local fishing industry will make tuna fishing unprofitable.
A spokesman for the Federation of Maltese Aquaculture Producers told The Sunday Times that according to scientific data there was no need for any further cuts and warned the sector would be tempted to operate illegally if EU ministers agreed to this move.
“We do not understand why the European Commission wants to slash the catch further because the report issued by the Scientific Committee on Research and Statistics of the International Commission for the conservation of Atlantic Tunas is very encouraging,” the spokesman said.
According to the report, the stock is stronger than was previously estimated (170,000 tonnes against the previously estimated 75,000 tonnes) and there are evident signs of recovery.
“Slashing the quota from 13,500 to 6,000 tonnes will mean Maltese fishermen will not be able to catch an amount sufficient to enable them to fish profitably,” he said.
“This means the temptation to fish illegally will increase since in most cases the allowable catch would not allow fishermen to recover expenses.”
On the other hand, environment lobbyists in Brussels are encouraging the commission to follow the path of further slashing the current quotas.
Welcoming the commission’s announcement, the World Wildlife Fund said that scientists estimated that stock size was only one third of sustainable levels and that only a total fishing quota of less than 6,000 tonnes per year might allow the tuna stock to rebuild by 2020 “with a probability of over 60 per cent”.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
G Falzon
Oct 24th 2010, 23:03
"It is only when you have cut the last tree, caught the last fish and polluted the last river, that you discover that you cannot eat the money" --- Indian proverb-prophecy
G Falzon
Oct 24th 2010, 22:42
Temptations for illegal operations always increase when laws are enacted. Human nature! It seems here profitable fishing means the destruction oif the species. This happens continuously with humans in this world. Take for example the over usage/extraction of oil, water, natural resources, bird hunting and trapping, etc etc. Why are hunters looked upon in a different manner than fishermen?
Karina Fiorini
Oct 24th 2010, 15:16
Once the last tuna fish is caught then what? Will the businesses shift towards another species and catch as much as they can from it, and then another and another..? On the other hand even we as consumers should be responsible, ideally we buy fish which originate from sustainably managed fisheries such as the certification issued by the Marine Stewardship Council http://www.msc.org/
Such partnerships ought to be considered by fishing businesses if they do not want to be driven out of this business and be aware that the consumers and future generations don't want to end up with a species-less sea.
Edward Camilleri
Oct 24th 2010, 14:02
@“Slashing the quota from 13,500 to 6,000 tonnes will mean Maltese fishermen will not be able to catch an amount sufficient to enable them to fish profitably,”
Then only will tuna recover, when fishing is no longer profitable! Why do we have to bring a species to the brink of extinction to realise that our activities are not sustainable?
The survival of this and other species is more valuable than the business they generate. If these species get extinct then what are fishermen going to fish?
CA MIller
Oct 24th 2010, 13:48
....... and speed limits lead to people exceeding the speed limit. I think we are on to something here. We should eliminate all laws, and that way nobody would break the law anymore. This is good stuff - we need more brilliant suggestions like this.
John C Betts
Oct 24th 2010, 11:13
Quoting the article:
"this measure is expected to be resisted by a number of member states amid claims by fishermen that it would drive them out of business."
And if successfully resisted, this will aid and abet the extinction of bluefin tuna, which would not only drive them out of business but also help upset the marine ecosystem.