Child abuse priest jailed for 21 years
Used personal charisma to pick out vulnerable boys
A paedophile former priest who fled to the United States in 1985 was yesterday jailed for 21 years for campaign of sexual abuse against young boys which began in the 1950s.
A jury at Birmingham Crown Court deliberated for around six hours before unanimously convicting 73-year-old James Robinson, who was extradited from California last year to face trial.
The former Roman Catholic priest, who worked in the Black Country, Staffordshire, Birmin-gham and Coventry after being ordained in 1971, simply stared at the jury foreman as he was found guilty of 21 sexual offences.
Mr Robinson, who was brought up in Brownhills, near Walsall, had denied all the offences, which were committed between 1959 and 1983.
Passing sentence, Judge Pat-rick Thomas QC, described the defendant as devious and manipulative.
He told Mr Robinson: “The offences you committed were unimaginably wicked and caused immense and long-lasting – we can only hope not permanent – damage to the six victims. You used, you abused your position of trust, your position of authority and total trust within the communities that you moved to and from.”
Mr Robinson, the judge said, had also abused his personal charisma to pick out vulnerable boys.
Judge Thomas told the disgraced priest: “You enjoyed, I have no doubt at all, selecting your victims, choosing vulnerable children. You enjoyed doing your best to habituate them, to groom them into accepting what you did to them.
You were and are sufficiently devious, manipulative and bold to have got away with a highly risky sequence of sexual encounters over a period of 25 years.”
The judge was also critical of Mr Robinson for refusing to return to the UK to face his accusers and stand trial for the “persistent and outrageous” offences.
“You fled the country and hid yourself away, hoping and believing that you were beyond the reach of the law,” he told the ex-priest. “Fortunately, the law does not forget, your victims would not forget and you have been brought to justice.”
The court heard that Mr Robinson was paid up to £800 a month by the Archdiocese of Birmingham until December 2001, despite officials being aware of the allegations against him.
Mr Robinson claimed in court that he had been unable to afford to return to Britain, although it was established that in February 2000 he was sent a cheque for £8,400 by the archdiocese.
Describing the Catholic Church’s role in Mr Robinson’s case as highly questionable, Judge Thomas said: “It is not for me to judge.
“Others may take the view that a full investigation and full disclosure of the results of that investigation is due to the members of that church and (Mr Robinson’s victims).”
Mr Robinson’s trial heard that he abused his victims, who are now in their 40s, 50s and 60s, after turning his back on a professional boxing career in his early 20s to train for the priesthood.
The former colliery blacksmith, whose full name is Richard John James Robinson, moved from parish to parish sexually abusing children, including two altar boys.
Jurors were told that the paedophile used his status as a priest to gain “unfettered and unlimited” access to boys, giving them gifts and taking them on trips in his sports car.
Unusually, Mr Robinson did not face charges relating to two of his six victims because they contacted the police after he was extradited.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Louise Vella
Oct 23rd 2010, 11:40
The Pope has acknowledged the church’s failure in not being “sufficiently vigilant and not sufficiently quick and decisive to take the necessary measures” when dealing with reports of clerical sex abuse and extended sympathy to the victims, but as ever, a complete apology is not to be found. The Pope makes a horrific situation worse by refusing to take simple, proven steps to safeguard the vulnerable, heal the wounded and expose the truth. He should , without further delay, order bishops all over the world to hand over files of priest child rapists to the police.
Louise Vella
Oct 23rd 2010, 11:38
There is no denying that evil and severe crimes have been done to those who had suffered at the hands of paedophiles posing under the once trusted title of priest. Victims of clerical sex abuse now know that they were not alone and that they can speak of the horror they had experienced. However the perpetrators were not the only ones at fault. All those who knew that children were being raped by priests and opted to look the other way or stay silent have encouraged the rape of children by priests.
Bishops were ineffective in doing their duty of paying heed to complaints and protecting vulnerable members of society. Bishops failed to stop known abusers from repeating their offences as they put the reputation of the church and priest child rapists as their highest concern. They opted to protect church secrets rather than protecting children.