Advert

Maltese urged to sign Lockerbie petition

Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi is suffering from terminal cancer. Photo: AFP

Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi is suffering from terminal cancer. Photo: AFP

The organisers of a petition seeking to overturn a verdict against the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing have appealed to the Maltese to support a bid to prove his innocence and clear Malta’s link to the disaster.

The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish government to open an inde-pendent inquiry into the 2001 conviction of Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi for the bombing of a Pan Am aircraft in December 1988.

The petition is steered by Justice For Megrahi (JFM), an organisation which includes a number of British victims’ relatives, and individuals like world-renowned philosopher Noam Chomsky and South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

Mr Al-Megrahi’s decision to drop his appeal in order to return to Libya after he was released on compassionate grounds in August 2009 means there is currently no means in Scotland by which the verdict may be re-examined.

JFM believes it could convince the authorities to re-examine what it calls one of the biggest miscarriages of justice to associate Libya with one of the worst terrorist attacks. The Pan Am 747 was bound for New York when it exploded over Lockerbie in Scotland, killing all 259 people on board and 11 on the ground.

Mr Al-Megrahi was convicted after Maltese shopkeeper Tony Gauci claimed the Libyan had bought the clothes used to conceal the bomb.

The Libyan was then accused of managing to elude security at Luqa airport by loading the suitcase containing a bomb unaccom­panied on an Air Malta flight to Frankfurt, whereupon it was transferred, again unaccom­panied, to a further flight to London. At Heathrow, it was finally loaded on to the target aircraft.

Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed in the bombing, appealed to the Maltese to support the call for an independent inquiry.

“There are serious doubts about the verdict and there are very serious doubts on the evidence given by Tony Gauci, who we now know was rewarded for his testimony,” he told The Sunday Times.

Those who studied the evidence know the atrocity was not caused by some device which originated from Malta and there is clear evidence that Mr Al-Megrahi never bought the clothing from the (Sliema) shop, Dr Swire said.

JHM representative Robert Forrester insisted that in the hope that Mr Gauci could identify the purchaser of the clothing from his shop, investigators had repeatedly shown him spreads of pictures of Mr Al-Megrahi.

Mr Forrester said evidence which emerged later showed that Mr Gauci and his brother were given money through the US Rewards for Justice Programme arrangement.

“Mr Al-Megrahi’s case should be referred back to the Court of Appeal, on no fewer than six grounds, in part due to the testimony of Mr Gauci.”

Furthermore, there is also the issue of the respective security regimes at Luqa, Frankfurt and Heathrow. Before the trial, the regimes of all three airports were expertly assessed – with Luqa coming out on top.

In addition, 18 hours before the Pam Am aircraft’s departure, someone broke into Heathrow airside giving access to the area in the vicinity of the Pan Am shed.

This information was known to the UK authorities well in advance of the trial but was not made public until after the verdict was announced.

While the JFM campaign acts to see Mr Al-Megrahi’s name cleared of the crime, it is also committed to seeing both the reputation of the Scottish criminal justice system and the good name of Malta restored, Mr Forrester said.

“Both Malta and Scotland are victims of what is tantamount to a criminal injustice by this verdict. This is an issue that goes beyond our obvious sympathy for Mr Al-Megrahi.

“The Maltese people won the George Cross for their extraordinary bravery during adversity of the Second World War, only to see their name tainted by what occurred at Camp Zeist – this is a gross and unconscionable insult.

“Ask yourself this. What would you do if you wanted to place a bomb on a plane departing from Heathrow? Place it, unaccom-panied, on a flight leaving Malta for Frankfurt to eventually be transferred to London in the hope that it would evade the security at three airports, or would you opt for the more obvious and more likely to succeed choice of simply singling out Heathrow?

“The three judges, who were also the jury, clearly preferred the more fantastical solution.”

The petition ( available on http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.uk/list_petitions.asp ) will run until October 28.

Advert

31 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

T Camilleri

Oct 10th 2010, 21:58

Martin Cassar you are right Martin. The USA has a BIG finger in the pie. How can anyone explain that CIA agents were on the scene of the disaster within minutes? Ever heard of a false flag operation? Moreover, an explosive expert/s have concluded that the cassette in which the bomb was allegedly in could not contain enough explosive to blow down the plane. Furthermore, can anyone imagine how a piece of printed circuit boars allegedly from the timer and clothes would survive and not be burned to a cinder having been in contact with the explosive when the explosion would cause temperatures of thousands of degrees celsius? This is simply a frame-up by the CIA for which they are well-known to frame Libya and Malta for not obeying their orders and kicking them out of Libya and Malta for not allowing their sixth fleet to use Malta as a public convenience for their sailors and marines.

Steve Borg

Oct 10th 2010, 16:48

And why won't you sign the petition if you think it was a miscarriage of justice? Why do we fear to challenge authority if there is evidence which came out after the verdict which proves it was wrong in the first place?

Anthony Farrugia

Oct 11th 2010, 11:22

On the other hand, we could ask the Gauci brothers to tell us what compensation they received from the US Department of Justice for testifying at the Hague ?

T Camilleri

Oct 10th 2010, 22:01

David Scerri wrong advise scerri. Everyone should sign it to clear Malta's name. The bomb was put on board in the UK and not in Malta. Do your research and you will know.

G.Schembri

Oct 10th 2010, 13:40

We have been involved, since Mr Gauci for reasons known only to himself identified the clothing as bought from his shop. I wonder what clothing this was since as far as I know Mr Gauci does not sell designers clothes, but very ordinary clothes which one can buy fom any other clothes shop on the island. I wonder how such a man can under oath say that such a shirt was bought by a certain Arab from his shop and not by some other person from another shop or from some open market.
If Megrahi was famed so was Malta, if Megrahi is proved innocent Malta will be cleared, so I will sigtn the petition not for Megrahi's sake but for Malta's sake. Let Justice take prevail.

David Buttigieg

Oct 10th 2010, 13:47

I don't know - maybe because it should be every person of goodwill's duty to ensure justice prevails?

C Fenech

Oct 10th 2010, 13:32

@ G.Attard

your reply just goes to show how blinded you are by racism (hopefully not ignorance). The petition is there for exactly the OPPOSITE reason ... that of clearing Al-Megrahi and Malta in the Lockerbie case ... and not to re-open the case and "let him rot in prison" ... the guy has suffered enough injustice thanks to the false testimony of a maltese person who is now living the life thanks to the large sum of money the Americans gave him for lying ....

Joseph Schembri

Oct 10th 2010, 14:40

I find comments such as yours despicable. To you justice is to make one person or party suffer so tht others who feel wronged feel better. To me justice should be about restitution.

wally vella-zarb

Oct 10th 2010, 15:05

"Let him get thrown back in jail where he belongs so families of the tragedy can finally get closure!"

What you seem to be forgetting is the fact that the people behind this petition are themselves "families of the tragedy", among them Dr Jim Swire who lost a daughter in the crash. He, together with most of the BRITISH families - not to mention prominent members of the British Judiciary - are not convinced of Megrahi's involvement. They hold that the entire trial was a farce, a miscarriage of justice, that included the questionable (to put it very mildly) Gauci testimony, the attempt to implicate Air Malta and the security at Luqa, the undisclosed break-in at Heathrow airside, and many other factors. Megrahi's release 'on compassionate grounds' effectively prevented a re-trial that would have exposed the fabrications that went on under the guise of a trial.

It is in OUR interest, as Maltese Citizens, to assist in what would clear the name of our Country and that of our National Carrier from the smear campaign that was instigated by the people who paid Gauci for his 'testimony'.

Joe Cassar

Oct 10th 2010, 15:34

We HAVE been involved, whether we like it or not, when it was alleged that the bomb was loaded in Malta.

This is our last chance to get at the truth and clear Malta's name.

Joe Cassar

Oct 10th 2010, 15:37

You seem to have misunderstood, Mr Attard. The promoters of this petition believe that Al-Megrahi and Libya had nothing to do with the bomb and believe that the inquiry will prove it.

Thanks for your signature, anyway.

Steve Borg

Oct 10th 2010, 15:57

Typical posting from someone who comments before he reads... Al Megrahi is the victim or a cruel miscarriage of justice, a system that wanted to nail the 'enemy' at the time. Why did you sign the petition if you think he's guilty? Dont you realise this picture was taken when he was released? Didn't you read the way he was framed up?

R.Abela

Oct 10th 2010, 18:17

It`s better for hundred criminals running on the loose then one innocent behind bars.

Advert
Advert