Arrigo denies allegations of interference, councillor backs claims
A loyal Nationalist councillor has confirmed a claim that Nationalist MP Robert Arrigo insisted on having one of his supporters kept in the employ of the Sliema council in a disagreement that had to be resolved by the party.
Councillor Yves (Bobby) Calì told The Times how he confronted Mr Arrigo after the latter complained about the council’s dismissal of Stephen Buhagiar, the MP’s former driver who had been working as the council’s contracts manager.
Former Sliema mayor Nikki Dimech is currently facing charges for soliciting a bribe from Mr Buhagiar when he was given the job.
During the first hearing in that court case, Police Inspector Angelo Gafà quoted Mr Dimech saying, under police interrogation, that Mr Arrigo asked the council to favour “his people” for jobs and tried to persuade the then mayor not to sack Mr Buhagiar.
Speaking to The Times, Mr Arrigo “categorically denied” Mr Dimech’s allegations, pointing out that the former mayor is facing criminal charges after admitting to the police he solicited a bribe “together with other serious admissions”.
“The allegations made by Mr Dimech in my regard are absolutely fictitious and untrue. Also, I have always believed that any applicant for any job should be competent on his own merits.”
He said that in his role as an elected representative of the people, he always believed he was at the service of his constituents to the best of his abilities with “utmost respect to the rules of law”.
But Mr Calì, who only weeks ago voted with his party to oust Mr Dimech, confirmed that he was annoyed with Mr Arrigo over the Stephen Buttigieg affair and the council took the issue to party level for it to be resolved.
Mr Calì said he was not present when Mr Arrigo and Mr Buhagiar visited Mr Dimech at the council for a meeting at night, as claimed by Mr Dimech during the police interrogation. “Nikki is probably confusing two meetings that took place at around the same time. I happened to meet Robert and Nikki on a different occasion. That’s when the subject about Mr Buhagiar’s dismissal came up and the disagreement between Robert and me escalated.”
Eventually, the matter was taken to party level where it was found that the council’s motion to terminate Mr Buhagiar’s post was valid.
Mr Calì said the council was prepared to assist MPs who forwarded genuine complaints from their constituents but when it came to appointing key people, they needed to appoint those most appropriate for the job, “not because they are backed by someone”.
“This is especially so when this is to the detriment of someone better suited for that particular job.”
He said it was “understandable” for MPs to help those most loyal to them to improve their presence within their constituencies “but there’s a limit”, adding that Mr Buhagiar had failed to comply with his contractual obligations.
“From three abstentions to his approval for the job, he ended up with all those present bar one voting against him at the end of his six-month probation stint,” Mr Calì said.
Mr Buhagiar was then dismissed by the council.
One of the several things that irritated some of the councillors about him was that he continued to use Mr Arrigo’s car while he was meant to be working for the council.
“Even I saw him once... It’s not on. It doesn’t look good. Even if there is nothing illegal about it; it annoyed me and I made sure that the message for it not to be repeated was brought to his notice. One wants people working for the council to be as independent and impartial as possible.”
Mr Arrigo spent two full terms as mayor and, later, his wife became mayor as well. He naturally “did all he could” to ensure Mr Dimech, his protégé, was elected, Mr Calì said.
“This is something Mr Arrigo himself admitted to. He organised parties, sent invites and phoned people. His staff even called my mother asking her to give Nikki first preference,” Mr Calì said.
“On one occasion I was pressed to attend one of the ‘parties for Nikki as mayor’. Some prospective councillors were there while others were spared the invitation. That’s Robert’s way of doing things but I don’t have to agree with everything he does.”
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
65 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
GiovDeMartino
Sep 28th 2010, 18:41
X'inhi r-raguni li l-politici KOLLHA jikru ufficcji, ihallsu l-belli mliri biex hemm jilqghu lill-kostitwenti ntaghhom? U tara kjuwijiet twal wara l-bibien ta' kull wiehed. Tghid x'imorru jaghmlu hemm. IPOKRITI!
Manuel Micallef
Sep 27th 2010, 20:52
in the last few weeks, it seems there is one case after the other of corruption and nepotism - especially on PN's sides.
The Sliema council's saga, Arrigo's nepotism accusations, the Delimara contract which even atracted criticism from the EU, Chris Said issue with the courts, and even Paul Borg Olivier is now being investigated for VAT fraud!!!
and on the PBO issue, we note that The Times if keeping well silent!!
GiovDeMartino
Sep 27th 2010, 20:03
Tinnutaw, l-ahwa, kif ahna, ilkoll kemm ahna, ahna ONESTI? Ahna biss, imma. L*ohrajn kollha dizonesti. Ahna qatt ma kellimna ministru u qatt ma ippruvajna naqbzu l-kju.
J.Scicluna - Rabat
Sep 28th 2010, 11:44
Speak for yourself...I and many others never stooped that low to "beg" for favours off any politician AND never will!
The only time when I will talk to politicians is to demand my RIGHT if it had been denied me.
Dr Joe Brincat
Sep 27th 2010, 19:22
Whom to believe, that is the question. Arrigo ? Yves Cali` ? It seems that this question has been settled at a higher level, within the same party. What I notice is that there should be in place rules and regulations and a whole department for transparency etc etc, and certain things happen, such as nepotism. Mr Cali` says that " it was “understandable” for MPs to help those most loyal to them to improve their presence within their constituencies “but there’s a limit”, adding that Mr Buhagiar had failed to comply with his contractual obligations." It does not seem that any limit was applied when Mr Buhagiar was employed. His dismissal was on the ground of failing to comply with contractual obligations. That came after. The question is what happened prior to his appointment"
Muscat Pat
Sep 27th 2010, 19:20
Do we deserve all this?
s.grima
Sep 27th 2010, 20:05
iva ta, il poplu malti ma jisthoqlux ahjar! meta kien hemm xi hadd li prova jiftahlu ghajnejh ghajru gidib u ma jafx imexi!!!
simon cutajar
Sep 27th 2010, 18:52
X' misthijja ta pajjiz ! hawn dan it- tahwid go bicca kunsill , ahseb u ara mela x' tahwid hemm fil- gvern li ahna ma inkunux nafu bih ! Kemm mort zmerg meta hsibt li Dr. Gonzi kien ragel ta dixxiplina u ta success ! Mort hafna zmerg
ms ghoare
Sep 27th 2010, 18:31
In my opinon a business man is always a business till the day he dies ,and i dont agree that businessman should be involved in politics , whatever color or party you belongs, I know that irresponsable people,greed,and any kind of fraud and abuse it ruining the rest of us and i beleive that the loyal Nationalist councillor that has confirmed and claimed that Nationalist MP Robert Arrigo insisted on having one of his supporters for the contract as it seems to be in our maltese blood to prefere him or her and try and get sombody you know , I am sorry but , i dont agree with Robert Arrigo ,him being a business , A businessman in politics to me means Conflict of intrest ,We need More respected and honest Independent councilors .
gcForte
Sep 27th 2010, 19:16
I agree with your interesting comment..........Maybe that is why Dr. Eddie Fenech Adami and Dr. Lawrence Gonzi never gave Mr. Robert Arrigo a Minister`s Office, especially last election when he was elected from two districts.......... Who knows ?
A Zrinzo
Sep 27th 2010, 17:57
Imhawda wahda sew il-borma guz!!
Victor Paul Borg
Sep 27th 2010, 16:28
The level of nepotism displayed in this evidence is so blatant that it is almost beyond belief.
I shudder to think that these people are running the country!
God help us!
www.victorborg.com
Joseph E Briffa
Sep 27th 2010, 16:18
@ Mr Buttigieg....Prior to 1987 - and after 1971 to be more precise - we did not exactly enjoy today's luxury of commenting on, let alone, criticising what takes place in the corridors of power..If you remember, people who openly criticised decisions taken by the Labour administration were considered to be potty. And this applied to everyone, whether a labourite or a nationalist. Even cabinet ministers were afraid to criticise; they knew that not only would they lose their jobs but their families could suffer as well. . Only one minister dared show dissent and he had to resign. Everyone got the message and kept their big mouth shut. It was practically a one-man show, and woe betide anyone who dared criticise. Post 1987, full democracy returned to Malta and everyone can now say whatever one feels like; the two big parties have their radio and their TV station, and the opposition party is free to disseminate their views. Quite a change from the time of Xandir Malta when the leader of the opposition was not even mentioned by name; quite a change from the times of the In______taghna..
v mercieca
Sep 27th 2010, 14:58
Arguing about a good leader reminded me of the joke of the different body parts who wanted to be boss. I guess you all know who won the post. Definitely it was not the brains.
We have the same situation today in our country. I can’t call Dr Gonzi the best of brains and he is acting more like the body part that won the post in the joke.
We can’t say what the PL has to offer with Joseph Muscat. We tried Dr Sant and we were disappointed, we tried Dr Gonzi and we are more disappointed.
Perhaps as the Maltese saying goes “fuq tlieta toqghod il-borma”
Pat Hobson
Sep 27th 2010, 16:05
I will be the last one to defend Dr. Alfred Sant. But time is proving him right all along. What happened during AS premiership, especially the last months, were not of his own doing, but due to his democratic values. He kept all permanent secretaries, regardless of their political leanings, and what happened? They ill-advised him (not all of them) and sabotaged his government. The opposition, didn't make it easy for him either. And the PN apologists dare to take about the PL opposing everything. All in all, as we all know what happens in the first years of every legislature, the most hard of decisions are taken in the initial years. And here Dr. A. Sant was caught midstream. That's why we can't say that under AS everything was ok, because it wasn't due to the said circumstances. If A. Sant was left for the full term, I'm sure things would have been different. I repeat again, AS is no favourite of mine.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 16:58
Dr. Sant had what it takes to be a super Prime Minister but he lacked in the departments of communication skills and charisma, two unimportant ingredients to run a country yet the two most important strengths to garner the colleagues’ and mass support to stand on a good power base. The man as a PM was too clinical for his own good.
s.grima
Sep 27th 2010, 14:06
iktar ma jaghdi zmien iktar jaghti ragun lil alfred sant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Adrian Borg Cardona
Sep 27th 2010, 12:28
The more I read about the goings-on in local councils, the more I am convinced what a BAD decision it was to involve politics in these counclls. Its seems that the political parties use these to push their men; the parties decides who should resign who should stay on.They even interven in disputes between council members! It is as if the voters count only on voting day - then the parties move in and run the show in the background. And I always thought local councils were for the benefit of the people. It seems that they were set up to help the political parties instead.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 12:48
Adrian,do not forget that the PL was and still is against the participation of political parties in local councils. If the PN also concurs the PL would promptly opt out.
M. Fenech
Sep 27th 2010, 13:56
In my opinion the law about local councils should be changed in order to BAN candidates who run for local council elections, then get elected and then after using their local council as a good platform to gain recognition among costituents, they run for the general election! That's how the system is working at the moment, and some people are privileged and many are not. If they want that local councils work for their respective locality, candidates should not run for general election. We have too many examples of candidates that ended up in parliament, after being in their respectivs local councils. All the mess that some councils are going through at the moment is because of this fact, and that is that their party's interest comes before that of the locality that they represent. And we still have to see more of these latest soap operas, in localities that until now have never been mentioned!! Just wait and see!!
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 12:15
The fat cats and corrupt politicians of the Mintoff, KMB and EFA era were a bunch of Altar boys as compared to the Popes that had taken over since Gonzi’s weak and sad administration. Kellu miljun ragun John Dalli bli qal il-bierah.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 11:35
As the head of one of Air Malta’s subsidiaries I experienced enormous pressure from particular PN big shots to give special preference to some of my then subordinates who were their protégées. I can recall one particular case with details when we issued a call for applications for the post of an Assistant Manager. We were ordered to change the required qualifications to accommodate one particular staff member, naturally a strong Nationalist. Because of the forced and unjust amendments in the requirements the most qualified applicant, a Labour supporter got disqualified and the unlikely candidate, a strong PN supporter got the promotion. During a different process, one other strong PN supporter didn’t make the grade and to appease him they created a new position to promote him to Manager.
I had encouraged the discriminated applicant to file a grievance with the Ombudsman to give me the opportunity to give evidence under oath yet the poor victim was afraid of repercussions that would have followed.
J Farrugia
Sep 27th 2010, 12:03
Have you ever had ANY pressures from Labour diehards during your 16 year reign at airmalta? Have you never notices the trend of Labour supporters who were employed with Airmalta during Wistin's time in Government?
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 12:43
It was 30 years at Air Malta not 16. During Wistin’s time there were more promotions given to PN supporters than to Labourites. Check it out for yourself. During that time Air Malta had a Chairman, a Managing Director and other Board Directors that were all Nazzjonalisti. The Majority of the Area Managers were also Nazzjonalisti. These were people coming from Malta Airlines with years of experience behind them. Air Malta was successful then because we practiced meritocracy, look at the state it’s in now.
H Dempster
Sep 27th 2010, 11:32
At least it nice to see that there is one PN Councillor who calls a SPADE A SPADE . Prosit Bobby , at least you are not like the other puppets.
Paul Borg
Sep 27th 2010, 23:58
Dempster, don't be happy too soon! Don't you realise that this result suits Gonzi perfectly, disgracing his rival in the Sliema camp?
Dylan Olliver
Sep 27th 2010, 11:29
This is all the Nationalist Party's fault. They should have never accepted certain people to contest the general elections or the local council elections. The party only did this to gain votes. But see what it really gained - Certain people in parliament and in the councils that can't be trusted.
Alexander Pace Gouder.
Sep 27th 2010, 10:39
The more time passes the more I am being proven correct. The Sliema Council Saga is going to be "A never ending story II" IS MORE TO COME??????? THAT IS THE QUESTION.A real mess and many are who are loosing faith in Politics. I for one. BYE BYE POLITICS> A very dirty game indeed seem to be taking place. Will we ever get to know the real truth about events which have been taking place and are still taking place re Slioema Council? As the saying goes (God KNOWS)
louis scicluna
Sep 27th 2010, 10:39
All this shows that it is becoming more difficult to trust someone who holds an ounce of authority.Once there used to be politicians on Pole position,now there are the local councillors breathing on their necks.
Marija Falzon
Sep 27th 2010, 10:26
This government is hanging by a few strings, which one by one are snapping. Its only a matter of time when we'll see a total collapse. What really worries me is that we the citizens, and Malta as a country are paying for Gonzi's lack of control of everything.
Niklaus Grech
Sep 27th 2010, 10:43
Oh, may your words come true. We would elect your PL and Joseph Muscat will lower the water and electricity bill, fuels, introduce again subsidies, etc. Everything will become cheap and affordable again!
Incidentaly many forget that the PL, with his original vision of wanting us out of the EU, would have made Malta loose many funds (and hence no restoration works, roads, scholarships, etc, etc.). By the way, whenever there was the Labour in goverment there was always "STAGNAR" U "INCERTEZZA." At least from this corrupt and inefficient governemt we are benefitting from something.
Marija Falzon
Sep 27th 2010, 11:41
Niklaus, If you're happy with this mediocre situation, its your problem. But most of the people I know, who come from very different walks of life, aren't.
lgalea
Sep 27th 2010, 11:55
Niklaus Grech in your wisdom you forget that what we get from the eu is something that we have already sent it. E.g. €182,192 EVERY DAY, all the customs duties and levies while we pay the customs officers to collect them, part of VAT, the loss of the Italian protocol, the loss of the interests on our reserves that had to be transferred to the ECB which the eu is now getting, the millions which we are paying for government employees to constantly go to Brussels and other countries on eu business, the more than €70 MILLION EVERY YEAR which "Open Europe" http://www.openeurope.org.uk/ estimates that we are incurring to implement eu laws, the invasion of foreign workers and illegal immigrants which are costing us an arm and a leg, etc etc
Charles Sammut
Sep 27th 2010, 14:28
@ Igalea
Then the EU gives us some of our money back and dictates what we do with it and when or they will take it back. Talk about masochists. We're gluttons for punishment.
lgalea
Sep 27th 2010, 15:26
Charles Sammut you are perfectly correct
Paul Pace
Sep 27th 2010, 10:18
X'tahwid sar hawn!!
Ma nafx kif Gonzi jistgha jibqa sejjer qiesu xejn mhu xejn!!
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 10:14
And then.....and then along came the historic year 1987 which gave the PN supporters hope for the beginning of a new era, one without institutionalised corruption, no favouritism and jobs awarded on meritocracy by way of total transparency.
jbusuttil
Sep 27th 2010, 10:53
When we get to know what happened in the Fgura Local council we can start taking the PL and comments like yours seriously.
Albert Farrugia
Sep 27th 2010, 10:06
Yet this time noone is asking Arrigo for his resignation.
Charles Sammut
Sep 27th 2010, 09:45
Everybody grabbing what they can before the ship goes down. Then its captain can go back to do what he does best, leading the Azzjoni Kattolika.
mark vella
Sep 27th 2010, 10:30
do you already have someone in mind to be prime minister?
Mark Galea
Sep 27th 2010, 10:42
@Charles Sammut
Good one - the only problem is which other leader? The remaining ones I know of are the (in)famous KMB, Alfred Sant, and Joe, the boy who plays with toys (today he should have been at school). The only able PL leader was the current President ... so, my dear Charles, although PL might win an election in the future, there is no able captain on the helm ... possibly another 96?
lgalea
Sep 27th 2010, 11:49
Mark Galea the (in)famous ones are those who led the PN throughout its existence. Remember Terinu, the exiled leaders because of their support for the Italian Fascists, the one who was given independence because the British Government wanted to shed its responsibility towards Malta while keeping what it previously had in military terns, the one who is responsible for the violence in the 70's and 80's and who again sold us to the eu colonialist foreigners and appointed himself pPresident, and the present one whose pair of strong hands are only there to be used against the Maltese citizens but not against foreigners, illegal immigrants and the inner circle friends and friends of friends?
Mark Galea
Sep 27th 2010, 12:40
@lgalea
Dear Mr Galea. Welcome back from your summer holiday, since we had little contribution from you this summer. Mr Galea, we are looking in the future, and we need able rulers ... which are quite rare these days ... they used to be a lot of them (dictators, I mean) in the prehistory of democratic malta (pre 1987), but now, since we are a democracy, they are difficult to find - obviously aspiring ones we have, but they must be trained and leave their toys at home and grow up.
C.Camilleri
Sep 27th 2010, 12:51
@ Mark Galea
" Joe, the boy who plays with toys! " Not bad coming from a supporter of a political party who says he believes in youths. No wonder the PN voted against that 18 years old can vote. It is also worth reminding what the "boy" achieved in the MEP elections both as a candidate and as a party leader.
Mark Galea
Sep 27th 2010, 13:52
@C.Camilleri
My friend, if I were to bet money, I would bet Joe will become PM, even though I would vote against him. However, he is inexperienced and (except for a few) surrounded by a pre-1987 mentality of doing things which was reflected in the 96-98 period. My friend, I am not on the PN gravy train, but can easily see what will happen in 2013 and later. PL will win, and then all the PL locusts will swarm to eat up what they have not in the last 23 years ... DO you think that Joe will be able to contain them, or his MP's, especially if he will have a 1 seat majority?
gcForte
Sep 27th 2010, 14:12
@ C.Camilleri ............The BOY who had the guts to stand up by himself defending the Maltese language against the Giants of the E.U.
Charles Sammut
Sep 27th 2010, 14:24
Yes, who? That is the question. But it is now getting to the point where anything is better than this lot. Sometimes an amputation should not be looked upon, as losing a limb, but stopping the gangrene spreading. Better a wooden leg than a rotten one.
lgalea
Sep 27th 2010, 15:29
Mark Galea we are now in a democracy? You are wrong Mark Galea. We are now (after 1987 apart from 1996-1998) living in a The Mocracy. They both sound the same but they are a totally different kettle of fish.
C.Camilleri
Sep 27th 2010, 19:56
@ Mark Galea Are you some kind of modern day prophet? You already know what is going to happen with certainty in the years to come. And by the way thank you for confirming that there is a PN gravy train which is infested with PN locusts eating what's left before the next election. As for the one seat majority, Dr,Gonzi showed Joe what he should do, Appoint every elected member as minister, junior minister assistant minister all with a good salary to keep their mouth shut. Just read what John Dalli had to say on the present administration yesterday. @ Forte You misunderstood my comments. Just read again my reply to Mr.Galea.
Mark Galea
Sep 28th 2010, 09:39
@lGalea
I really admire your ability to give different meaning to words. However, it takes much more than words to govern and win elections, as 2008 has clearly shown.
J Brincat
Sep 27th 2010, 09:38
In Maltese we aptly say 'il-qasba ma ccaqcaqx ghal xejn'.
So whom are we to believe in this case?
Is seems that a spell has been cast on the PN.
joh muscat
Sep 27th 2010, 10:39
The spell is self inflicted, especially by one who has par idejn sodi. It began with John Dalli and continued ad nauseum. Terinu's times are re-appearing!!
r pace bonello
Sep 27th 2010, 09:34
There are still many unanswered questions but one, in particular, is why did Mr R Arrigo, support Mr Dimech's candidacy so strongly? Was he one of the very few who did not know his background? Surely if you recommend a person you should make sue that he has the right credentials for the post in question. Why?
Malvin Debono
Sep 27th 2010, 09:33
"He said it was “understandable” for MPs to help those most loyal to them to improve their presence within their constituencies “but there’s a limit”,
I guess in my naivety I thought that MP's were supposed to help all their constitutents not help more those who can help THEM (confusing!). I feel like crying... but somehow think I am not the only one!
Darren J. Galea
Sep 27th 2010, 09:29
Looks like a witchhunt in the offing. If I were Mr. Arrigo I would keep my back against the wall at all times.
Manuel Micallef
Sep 27th 2010, 09:25
I suppose now we have collaboration of evidence - since another PN councillor is saying that Arrigo pushed for his people;
To me now, if we live in a democratic country, the police should start an investigation.
and Arrigo should resign.
Joseph Busuttil
Sep 27th 2010, 11:41
As reported in other media Gonzi 'admires' Said’s decision to resign, 'in line with PN's motto'
Are you going to apply this "PN's motto" to Arrifo Gonzi?
gcForte
Sep 27th 2010, 13:40
@ Joseph Busutill..............And now Dr. Paul Borg Olivier. The General Secretary of the P.N. have a conflict with the VAT department. And he is to visit the law courts next month .Mela kullhadd tilef il boxxla jew.
gcForte
Sep 27th 2010, 09:17
If I am not mistaken, Beppe Fenech Adami a P.N member of parliament mentioned something about " If Nikki Dimech goes down somebody will be in serious trouble ". I am not sure if he was referring to N.P. Robert Arrigo. Honestly, at this moment I do not want to be in the shoes of the Prime Minister Dr.Gonzi, not even for a million euros a day. But, I believe that he ( Dr.Gonzi ) has to lift a big part of this mess. Running a country for more than 20 years with the same political policies, when knowing that there is only one seat difference,in my opinion, the first thing that Dr. Gonzi should have done was to strengthen his position within his party, by giving a free vote of confidence. What is happening is that, the P.N, activists knowing that this might be the last performance of the party, they are trying to grab as much as they could, ignoring the P.M. and those who still remain faithful to the party. Story always repeat it self, this happened during the ending of the M.L.P.era in the late 80`s.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 10:43
Grab what you can while you can.
Amanda Catania
Sep 27th 2010, 11:38
Charles J. Buttigieg applies perfectly to those who have occupied the Pieta boathouse which is public property and turned it into a restaurant for private profit and have also had a nearby area turned into a parking area.
Joseph E Briffa
Sep 27th 2010, 09:12
The habit of MPs trying to keep their constituents happy at all costs is no revelation. It happens all over the world but Malta being very small, we have the perception that this custom is all pervasive and that it is something unique to our island. Malta's population is like that of an average European town, everybody knows everybody else and so it is much easier for people to have access to their MPs. How many times have we heard people advising us to speak to Hon X or Y , or to somebody in their secretariat, or to their drivers? Drivers spend alot of time in the company of their Minister or MP and can talk to their bosses in privacy. It's little wonder then that drivers use their unique position to ask favours from MPs and are many a time successful. It has been going on since time immemorial and will continue to happen no matter what: this is human nature. It happens at central level as well as regional level. It's not easy to say no to a Minister's driver, as doing so will no doubt incur the wrath of the minister or MP. C'est la vie.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Sep 27th 2010, 10:22
Where you as apologetic prior to 1987?
r ferriggi
Sep 27th 2010, 08:51
mela hasbuna ta subajna fhalqna jew??
mata nghixu ta. nafu xinhu ghddej.