Advert

FKNK condemns killing of spoonbills

The killing of majestic spoonbills which reached Malta earlier this week was a disgrace and an act that should be despised by everyone, especially serious and law abiding hunters and trappers, the Federation for Hunting and Conservation – Malta (FKNK) said.

It said in a statement that reports of a flock of spoonbills migrating over our islands reached the Federation early this week. It also received reports that this flock had landed to rest for the night in an area close to Burmarrad.

The FKNK was then informed that poachers had managed to sneak through the guarded area and take shots at these birds, killing some.

“This is a disgrace to everyone who loves birds and the environment and is an act that should be despised by everyone, especially every serious and law-abiding hunter and trapper.

“Without reservation and with all responsibility on behalf of the thousands of its members, the FKNK totally condemns such vile acts. In fact, the FKNK is hereby officially calling on all its members to notify the ALE section of the Malta Police immediately any one of them has any knowledge of any facts that could lead to the incrimination of the perpetrators.

“It is only in this manner that we, as a hunting and trapping community can really be seen to be the real guardians of the environment.

“The public sees such criminal acts as being hunter oriented and while this is an incorrect assumption, it is up to us to do our utmost to discriminate against such wrongdoings,” it said

The FKNK urged the police to do their utmost to investigate this case thoroughly and placed its resources at the disposal of the police, if this can assist in their task.

It reiterated its “zero tolerance” stand and said it would immediately halt the membership of any person caught, tried and convicted of wilfully shooting strictly protected species.

Advert

96 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 14:01

Before classifying who is an idiot or not, I would like to point out that:

1. Every country has a poaching problem.

2. Every country allows hunting (upto date only one anti mentioned a country that has no hunting on it, and a quick search for this country's hunting activity on google, and his claim was rediculed as the country even offered hunting holidays).

3. No country has ever banned hunting because of poaching.

4. BLM & CABS have claimed through a press release that they are not after total bans because that would amount to extremism and they are not extremists...are we to believe that their supporters are extremists (if so nothing will ever please them)?

5. You want a vote....go ahead....lets make 2 votes....one for an EU without hunting & the other for banning hunting. Because if you want to tak something out of a voted manifesto...you first have to do a retake..then we will see how Malta will remain in the EU without the stolen votes.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 11:32

What referendum in Spain?

Bullfighting in Spain was ONLY banned in Catalonia (simply a region) for the following reasons:

1. It was not profitable, since only 2 venets per year were held, for which only half the tickets were ever sold.

2. In this region they are trying to disassociate themselves from anything Spanish, be it bullfighting or sangria.

Aprt from the fact that it was decided through a parliamentary vote and not through a referendum.

However, I agree, bring on a referendum.....with 3 questions:

1. BAN POACHING YES_____ NO______
2. BAN HUNTING YES_____ NO______
3. BAN EXTREMISTS YES_____ N0______
4. EU MEMBERSHIP WITHOUT HUNTING YES_____ NO______
5. EU MEMBERSHIP WITH HUNTING YES_____ N0______

I would vote:
1. YES
2. NO
3. YES
4. NO
5. YES

If a referendum on hunting had to really take place I expect that a retake of the EU referendum would aslo take place....since hunting was a very hot topic in that referendum that warrented a letter by; pm efa, pn, mic, a guarantee by vice precident for eu commission gunther verheugen (all small caps intended)

http://www.meusac.gov.mt/Portals/FME/Documents/AGGSE13e_Hunting.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iRNln1D7fs

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 14:21

What Spanish referendum?

Spain did not hold a referendum re bullfighting. Catalonia (simply a region, not all Spain) managed through a slim parliamentary majority outlaw bullfighting. Without going into the ethical merits of bulfighting, the following must be said:

1. In Catalonia, only 2 annual events were held, for which ticket sales were very very poor. They simply banned a non existing activity.

2. Catalonia, is believed to have done thsi since it is seeking cultural independence from Spain.

3. Catalonia, still allows hunting, and hunting holidays are very normal, http://www.huntingincatalonia.com/

4. Banning hunting, especially since it is practiced all over the EU would be seen as perescussion of minority....that is punishable by law....maybe that is why CABS changed their tune, and literally changed the words 'banning hunting' to 'banning illegal hunting'

How about this referendum?

1. Do you want to eliminate poaching Yes____ No____
2. Do you want to ban hunting Yes____ No____
3. Do you want to ban extremism Yes____ No____
4. Do you want to exit the EU if hunting is banned Yes____ No____
5. Do you want to exit the EU if hunting is not banned Yes____ No____

I would vote:
1.yes
2.no
3.yes
4.yes
5.no

Johnny Xerri

Sep 28th 2010, 16:09

unbelievable R Caruana claims that the Spanish held a referendum on hunting or bullfighting (coz from his comment one can hardly know on what the referendum was held) and then when his claim is contradicted he does not reply.

Mudsling hope that some gullible fool reads and believes that Spain held a referendum, when expossed just leg it!!!! At least if it is true, get the proof and I will acknowledge your claim. As things stand you had a go at showing people you are a peacock when in fact you are 2 feathers short of being a crow (cawla)

Charles Gauci

Sep 24th 2010, 21:07

The fact that, as you said, two police officers had to keep a round the clock watch on the birds, shows how bad the poaching situation is locally. Things will only change if and when FKNK and its members start turning in these morons to the police. Unless this happens, neither you ,nor anyone from the pro-hunting fraternity can blame the man in the street for calling for a total ban on hunting. This is not an isolated incident. Poaching (or illegal hunting) takes place every day and every night. It is useless for hunters who claim to obey the law to pretend not to be aware of this. As someone else pointed out, the ball is in your court.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 11:08

Charles,

Banks are guarded round the clock, the parliament is guarded round the clock, so are embassies, and so are our airports....using your argument our country is not that safe...

If poaching was really that bad and if hunters were to all be poachers....then for the name of God we would not be here writting comments but collecting bodies of not only birds....can you imagine 17000 hunters shooting at will at anything that flies....not even the whole police, army, CABS, BLM and FKNK would manage to neter a field let alone protect a bird

Charles Gauci

Sep 26th 2010, 06:27

Honestly Johnny, I think you are mixing lettuce with something else. Banks, embassies, etc. are guarded round the clock in every country but birds are not (except by NGOs). A couple of years ago a Labour MP critised the police because they were keeping watch on a bird (forgot whether it was a Spoonbill or a Flamingo). Although several people writing in are asking for the abolition of hunting I have knowehere seen written that all hunters are poachers. However, you must admit that poaching IS a big problem in Malta and the size of our islands exacerbates this problem. So wouldn't you and others like you benefit greatly if CABS and BLM succeed to eradicate this problem?

Johnny Xerri

Sep 26th 2010, 13:10

I am mixing nothing with lettuce.

Your reasoning was that if the birds had to be guarded then we have a big problem with poaching. With the same reasoning if the other institutions I mentioned are guarded, then it means we also have a big problem with crime.

Banks attract thiefs, embassies attract terrorists, protected birds attract poachers. Is it right, no it should not be so, but unfortuanatly criminals stop at nothing.

Re your comment "Although several people writing in are asking for the abolition of hunting I have knowehere seen written that all hunters are poachers"

Come on it was never printed black on white simply because poeple do not want to end up in risking a court for calling someone a poacher without that person being so. However, when people call for bans following a report that a proctected bird was found dead, what are they implying? The ban will effect all, so they are implying that we are all poachers. When people redicule the term law-abiding hunters what are they doing? They are saying? That all hunters are poachers.

Poaching must end, but the mentality of banning hunting because of poaching must also end

Johnny Xerri

Sep 26th 2010, 13:23

I would benefit if BLM & CABS targeted only poachers....but all theya re doing is bothering law abiding hunters, filming a few poachers, and then using these incidents to bring hunters to bad light, in the hope that hunting is banned.

1.They should eductae the public that hunting is practiced world-wide.
2. They should educate the public that it is only poachers that are doing the harm and that poaching should be banned not hunting.


They strive and celebrate when protected birds are shot, because for them its another piece of ammo to try and ban hunting. If they really wanted to ban just the poaching, then why ban hunting for quails and turtledoves from 3pm onwards.

Considering that they have always claimed tht autumn is an alternative to spring, how can one call have days in which game is limited as an alternative? Can't the public see that the more BLM are trying to deprive hunters in the hope that they feel threatend with a ban, and so they will feel that once everything is lost they might as well poach? Thank God hunters are not falling into this trap.

Charles Gauci

Sep 26th 2010, 15:47

Johnny, CABS and BLM are targeting poachers not hunters. Unfortumately hunters are getting a bad name because FKNK, to my knowledge at least, has never turned in a poacher to the police. This despite repeatedly preaching zero-tolerance. Don't tell me that no one knows who decimated the Spoonbills. Don't tell me that no one ever saw a bird of prey being shot these last days? Only last Thursday two poachers were seen by me shooting at birds of prey at l-Ahrax tal-Mellieha (an area 'controlled' by FKNK). They then proceeded with impunity to kill a Honey Buzzard very close to the Ghadira Nature Reserve (well into the protected zone). By the time the police arrived, the two cowards had made their getaway and the police searched other hunters present in the area. Do you honestly think that none of these hunters
know who these two are? If they want to rid themselves of poachers wouldn't it be wise to report them to FKNK who in turn should report them to the police and exercise its zero tolerance. Come on Johnny, lets call a spade a spade.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 27th 2010, 22:52

Joke of the day "Johnny, CABS and BLM are targeting poachers not hunters."

If BLM & CABS only wanted to target poachers, then why not let the government apply a derogation to hun quail and turtle doves, these are not protected species and even the ECJ claimed that autumn is no alternative.

If BLM & CABS only want to target poavhers why push for a ban in the afternoon, especially when spring did not open and so autumn is the only time when one can hunt turtle doves and quail.

If they are not after a ban but only after poachers, then why try to take over Mizieb. First they try using the legal argument that Mizieb was not handed over to hunters in a legal manner. Then they start with the gimicks. How can one believe that over 300 birds were buried at Mizieb, when BLM & CABS with all their equipment gallor never filmed a bird being killed at Mizieb. Come on 300+ birds and not one filming?

How can one cooperate, with these chaps. Do not expect help, before seasons open as promised and law abiding hunters are not threated as scum.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 11:01

Paletta (spoonbill) not to be mistaken with Palettuna (shovler - duck) just in case a hunter writes that he killed a Palettuna (the shovler duck) and we get some antis writting that a hunter has confessed to killing a spoonbill

Michael DeBono

Sep 24th 2010, 11:25

Tahseb li jekk jaqtghu il-kacca ha jieqfu dawn l-affarijiet? l-illegailtajiet jibqghu ghal dejjem, jekk taqta l-kacca jbatu biss dawk li josservaw il-ligi. Dawk li jiksru l-ligi l-istess se jibqghu jaghmlu. Bhal f'kull qasam iehor... L-unika haga li rridu naghmlu hi li nghassu iktar, u multi ikbar u iktar horox. Il-bqija mhux se ssib tarf.

J Borg

Sep 24th 2010, 01:09

Calm down. Mr Smith. I have frequently written myself condemning this 'sport'. (Who enjoys seeing these lovely creatures in a mangled heap??) I also critisized, quite often, FKNK, who claim 'zero tolerance', and yet always attack CABS and BLM, instead of thanking them for helping to weed out the bad guys in their register. I don't accept that Malta has become a joke, or that there is much anger against us, MORE than there is anger against BULLFIGHTING in Spain, FOX HUNTING in the UK, and other barbaric 'sport' worldwide!

T Borg

Sep 24th 2010, 07:26

What other country? The UK for one with it's fox hunting. Spain for it's bull fighting and Italy for rampant bird killings. Are these too medieval countries? Aren't the Brits idiots as well to dress up in red, blow their horns and run after a small defenseless fox? But I guess in other 'civilised' countries these things are considered as cultural!
What a joke!!!

joseph lia

Sep 24th 2010, 07:36

@Mike Smith, if your name denotes British ancestry or relation just check the RSPB (UK) website statistics for last year's, yes last year not the dark ages, destruction and poaching of protected species, over 350 cases! Evidently much more cases reported than our third world backwater Island you so vehemently critisize. Very convenient for CABS & Co to string along a German TV crew, don't you think? Why not try the UK now, once they have so conveniently 'uncovered' Malta's barbarism, or is the UK devoid of such illegal acts and hunting does not exist over there?!

M. Cardona

Sep 24th 2010, 09:19

Malta does not allow the killing of such birds. In this case, hunters agree with BLM that such birds should never be targeted.

Unfortunately there remains a pocket of individuals who are intent on persisting with such despicable acts, even at the cost of tarnishing all hunters as well as providing fodder to the other side of the debate.

These birds were under surveillance and protection and yet still they got shot. It simply proves the point that collective punitive measures simply don't work; a case in point being the curtailed hunting after 1500h from 15 to 30 Sept. This and other unjust policies coupled with unjust media presentation as well as unfair requests by the other side of this debate have created undue antagonism.

Ironically, it is a well known fact in BL circle (studies and reports by BLI) that effective protection and conservation entails the co-operation of local hunting fraternities. Factually, illegal hunting in Buskett was curbed through co-operation between both ends.

So why this continuous stance of confrontation from BLM through their persistent demands for more restrictive measures on legal hunting and quarry, coupled with purposely muddling illegal hunting with the legal pursuit of the hobby?



M. Cardona

Sep 24th 2010, 14:10

Malta does not allow the killing of such birds. In this case, hunters agree with BL in that such birds should never be targeted.

Unfortunately there remains a pocket of individuals who are intent on persisting with such despicable acts, even at the cost of tarnishing all hunters as well as providing fodder to the other side of the debate.

These birds were under surveillance and protection and yet still they got shot. It simply proves the point that collective punitive measures simply don't work; a case in point being the curtailed hunting after 1500h from 15 to 30 Sept. This and other unjust policies coupled with unjust media presentation as well as unfair requests by the other side of this debate have created undue antagonism.

Ironically, it is a well known fact in BL circle (studies and reports by BLI) that effective protection and conservation entails the co-operation of local hunting fraternities. Factually, illegal hunting in Buskett was curbed through co-operation between both ends.

So why this continuous stance of confrontation from BLM through their persistent demands for more restrictive measures on legal hunting and quarry, coupled with purposely muddling illegal hunting with the legal pursuit of the hobby?

John Borg

Sep 24th 2010, 07:59

In a way you might be right but do you think that FKNK members (hunters) will be happy to go out and do the government job (curbing illegalities) while the same government pays them back with a closed spring season, afternoon bans on Sundays & public holidays and after 3.00pm between 15 to 30 September; which is exactly the opposite of what they have been promised in writing?
FKNK has offered it's members help but under a condition that they are given a decent hunting season which for the vast majority of Maltese hunters means Turtle dove and quail hunting in spring like it has always been on these islands. Not to mention song bird trappers (also FKNK members) who have no season at all, they must be bursting of willingness to police the countryside!
The solution lies in government hands, a fair and just compromise and from there on all parties will work in the same direction.

Alex Ellul

Sep 24th 2010, 00:16

and so say most of us..the majority....

Andrew Gatt

Sep 24th 2010, 09:50

Ban G. Grech once and for all.

J Borg

Sep 24th 2010, 01:13

Let's be fair, Mr Borg. I know of several hunters and trappers who never break the law: they are the departed! May God grant them eternal rest!

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 10:53

The police were invloved and this is what materialised:

"However, and since you chose to publicize this issue, it would be opportune to point out that the person responsible for posting the piece that you used as an excuse to trigger off your letter is not a member of the FKNK and does not hold a hunting and/or trapping licence. In fact, it would not be completely senseless for one to opine that he could be a BirdLife member, it being not the first instance when BirdLife sympathizers contributed on our Forum."

BLM must have forgotten to inform the public that they got a reply for their open letter. But anyway I have been gentle enough to inform you and provide you with the letter:

http://forum.huntinginmalta.org.mt//YaBB.pl?num=1284654891

Enjoy reading it...and don't feel let down by BLM for not informing you...you are not the first to have made a fool of yourself while trying to defend them....

Mike Orland

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:43

Poor guy you Danny. How ashamed you must have been. I suggest a reply for you in such cases when only sparrows are noticed around. Tell your foreign friends that:

"Unfortunately only sparrows and pigeons can make it to drink the only fresh water available on this tiny island, which water one can find only in the plant pots in your garden or in the street after your wife or mother finishes to clean the pavement in front of your front door. Unless birds start to drink sea water they can come to Malta for ages and they will never see any. You know fresh water is in some way or another deemed a bit necessary for life usually. Only God knows why."

If only we had the Venezulan Delta's ahhh!!!! your friend would be a happy turist. However I have to admit, I have been to many cities around Europe and it's a shame we do not have Crows.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 10:47

How can shoutguns be outlawed and collected when they were legally bought and licenced? Some are not even used for hunting, some are just collection items. Can you imagine a (minimum) €1000 hunting shotgun and some costing €2000 + being kept in one or few places? What would happen? Are we suppose to get in line to collect our gun at 8pm so that we may be ready by 5am (2hrs before sunrise) and then redeposit them at what time 5am so that we are in time for 9pm (2hrs after sunset)? And who will take care of them.

Used only in designated areas....so according to you I should not use my 25 tumoli of private land, so that maybe you could enjoy it yourself?

The public does have more than enough land.....whenever I go to any of the 40 Bird Santuaries, I never feel crowedout and have pleanty of space....you feel crowed out because you do not tolerate anybody...I suggest you find a deserted island...so that you can dictate and live how you want., coz nothing else will be good enough for you

M.Coppini

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:19

Who's moaning....I think it's hilarious...'guardians of environmental destruction' foresta 2000 will loom over your heads forever, it's too late for clever speeches now.

J. Borg

Sep 23rd 2010, 22:01

@ Damato

You miss the point that there are allegedly thousands of law abiding hunters out there in the countryside, whilst protected birds have been shot down years on end.

peculiarly in all these years FKNK and its social and cultured members never effectively kicked the police to apprehend and prosecute a criminal hunter!

Now it is either because they conveniently turn a blind eye (and two) OR because they are simply outnumbered!

The cheeky and self-defeating part is when CABS finally decide to thanklessly take the initiative to deter these vile killings - they are called names by the so-called Zero Tolerance FKNK.

Guess FKNK have some distorted priorities.

S Diacono

Sep 23rd 2010, 22:16

LOL loved your comment :) quote "Is there an influx of migrating birds wreaking havoc on the countryside that I don't know about? " hahahha LOOOLLL PRICELESS !!

M Ellul

Sep 24th 2010, 09:24

Hahahaha !!! Good one mate!!!

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 10:32

were it not for hunters we would hardly have any trees, and habitat left.

Oh of course the environmentalists really do their part for conservation.....building in fields....just like is happening at this moment at saghtrija zebbug gozo....the Merill (blue rock thrush) has been breeding along with rabbits (legal game) for ages......even if hunters have practiced their hobby there for ages as well......yet now thanks to modern people who want to enjot nature......we have a natural ridge turned into a 10 level bunker and the fields which were previously with indiginous trees turned into orange orchards so that these modern people can enjoy some argitourism orange fruit picking.....

and best of all BLM kept silent about this ruined nesting site, of not a common bird, but of MALTA' S NATIONAL BIRD. SHAME

Johnny Xerri

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:36


Just ban driving, self-employed, priests, judges, politicians.... once and for all and impose harsh fines and prison sentences on who is caught; driving, those working as self-employed or priests or judges or politicians. And pls don't give me the crap about drivers and joyriders, about self-employed and tax avaiders, priests and pedoes, judges and bribed judges, politicians and power grabbers. Drastic changes require drastic measures. Use public transport, work as employees, pray on your own, get foriegn judges and politicians.


Is it possible that if society distinguishes between; priests and pedoes, drivers and joyriders, politicians and corrupt politicians, judges and corrupt judges, males and rapists, women and prostitutes, the same society cannot distinguish between hunters and poachers?

w.scicluna

Sep 24th 2010, 01:52

@ Johnny Xerri. There's a small difference....those that you mentioned don't normally carry a shotgun and shoot at everything that flies. Oh and if you are thinking that everyone deserves a hobby, that is true but at least get a hobby that doesn't kill other living things. Its a real pity that birds cannot shoot back. I'd really like to see how much you'd like it!

w.scicluna

Sep 24th 2010, 12:15

Johnny Xerri, the people you mentioned do not usually carry shotguns and shoot at anything that flies. Thats the difference.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 25th 2010, 10:25

oh I see Mr or Mrs Scicluna,

So if a poacher acts illegally, all people who have a shotgun will be liable.

Shotguns are carried and used by hunters and poachers but according to your reasoning law abiding hunters should all be held liable and punished (with a ban) for the actions of other people (poachers) action.

Yet for Mr/Mrs Scicluna if you are a member of any other group you will only be liable for your actions.

What bothers this person is not actually the crime its self but the fact that we carry a gun.

"Johnny Xerri, the people you mentioned do not usually carry shotguns and shoot at anything that flies. Thats the difference."

Yes, go tell that to the people who have been molested and raped by priests. Or to those who ended up as victims of corrupt judges and polliticians. Or to those who have suffered a loss at the hands of joyriders. Mhux hekk W Scicluna...as long as they don't carry shotguns...they will not be collectively blamed...

Stefan Micallef

Sep 23rd 2010, 20:44

" Please FKNK, please do yourselves a favour and next time write one less sentence for your own benefit."
Im sure people like you would still find something wrong,you are just never happy!

D Borg

Sep 23rd 2010, 22:11

No Stefan, you're wrong. People like me will be happy the day when a majestic group of spoonbills or swans will reach our island to rest for the night, and there will be absolutely no danger for them of being blasted out of the sky, so that they would be able to continue their peaceful journey the next morning, while adorning the sky.
I am not so optimistic about this though, thanks to the so-called "thousands of law-abiding hunters" living on our island, most of whom are members of FKNK.

Stefan micallef

Sep 24th 2010, 15:55

How can you say thousands of poachers!3 poachers could have killed the spoonbills.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:23

without ever defending poaching and illegal hunting...I humbly ask you from which country you originate....and if hunting is banned, or at least no poaching occures.

Poaching is not a national problem. It is not a European problem. It is a world-wide problem. Yet in no country is poaching used as an excuse to ban hunting.

BLM should stop the war against hunting, and start a war by signing a declaration with FKNK in which both parties agree about legal hunting seasons in line with the birds directive....and both parties start a real war against poaching....

BLM could use its financial resources to fund a reward system, rewarding anybody (hunter or not) who helps in reporting, identifying and exposing any poacher.

Government could start a system in which fines are passed on to BLM & FKNK so that they can be used for the reward system and for conservation projects.

FKNK could start a system in which part of the membership is also used in the reward system.

Whilst BLM may not like legal hunting, it must accept that hunting will continue to be practiced just like in the rest of the world...and fight only illegal hunting/poaching

S Vella

Sep 24th 2010, 10:35

I totally agree with Johnny Xerri!!
You cannot point your finger at Malta only. Poaching takes place worldwide and some birds which are protected in Malta, are considered as pests overseas and killed!! Some are poisoned, shot etc so consider poaching as a worldwide problem
We all know that a lot of rare reatures (not just birds) form part of collections of rich people who only can afford them. In Africa Elephants were killed simply for their tasks and left there to rot, not by Africans, by White Civilized men who made big bucks from their kill.
I condemn poaching in any way and congratualte FKNK for its statement to condemn this killing.
One must keep in mind that the police force are doing their utmost to controle poaching, and are catching some irresponsable poachers, but not all, So sont be smart and expect FKNK to solve the problem!

Andrew Gatt

Sep 23rd 2010, 20:03

Because, Franco, NOTHING ever satisfies you.

Mario Farrugia

Sep 23rd 2010, 20:19

@Mr. Franco Farrugia
Mr. Farrugia, I can only post my comment/reply to you in Maltese....
Imma lilek xejn ma jikkuntentak? Taf xi dwejjaq fik?? Dejjem teqred. Jaqaw imdejjaq bid-dinja kollha ta' madwarek int, Sur Farrugia? Kieku qatt nara' xi kumment bis-sens minn ghandek... Mohhok biex tikkritika, twaqqa' ghac-cajt, tirredikola, ecc. ecc. U mhux fuq il-kacca biss ta... imma fuq KOLLOX! Alla jbierek qisek tisthajlek xi expert fuq kollox... meta fil-fatt kieku xi darba rajt xi suggeriment ta' sens minn ghandek!
Uff, xi dwejjaq fik!!!

j Aquilina

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:07

......................because you only see the negative things in life and no positives! People like you should not even be allowed to write on these blogs.

Johnny Xerri

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:12

& I will be dreaming of; educators, brain washers, wardens, gramblers and people on sick leave enjoying a holiday aborad..

Franco Farrugia

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:34

Well, I am glad my comments bring out the moths - and the troglodytes!

Charles Gauci

Sep 23rd 2010, 19:55

So are you saying that the ALE section of the police is inefficient? People like you do not want CABS and BirdLife doing this work as you say that it is the job of the local police. And what if CABS and/or Birdlife were watching over the birds and a poacher approached? What are they expected to do? The cannot apprehend the criminal. They would, of course, phone the police.

Mario Gauci

Sep 24th 2010, 08:44

@Niki Cremona

The disgrace is that police, cabs and birdlife members had to keep a 24 hour watch over these birds........SAYS A LOT ON THE INTEGRITY OF OUR SO CALLED HUNTERS. And yes some hunter/s did manage to shoot these Spoonbills down making it difficult for FKNK to use the usual argument of frameup like they say happened at the Mizieb bird cemetry, where hundreds of protected bird species were found shot.

G. Grech

Sep 23rd 2010, 21:59

yes well done. But, we've heard already a lot of this cheap talk.

Advert
Advert