Advert

Jail term halved on appeal

The jail term of a man jailed six years for his part in a fight that led to the death a Filipino man at Cherries Bar in Birżebbuġa on Christmas Day 10 years ago has been reduced by three years on appeal

A three-judge panel ruled that the verdict which had been reached - that Charles Demicoli, 34, was not guilty of murder but guilty of taking part in the fight which led to his death, was contradictory.

In the incident Perfecto Rabino Montalban, 44, who was on a ship in the Freeport, had gone to a bar to celebrate Christmas with a friend and got killed following a brawl.

Mr Demicoli had admitted to having thrown a small bar stool at Mr Montalban and according to pathologists the victim died from a single blow to the back of the head.

Chief Justice Vincent De Gaetano, Mr Justice David Scicluna and Mr Justice Joseph Zammit Mckeon said the jurors had Mr Demicoli of being the person who had dealt the lethal blow but at the same time said that he had injured the victim and might have caused his death.

However, there was only one fatal injury.

The three judges said that Mr Demicoli should have been found guilty of accidental affray without the proviso in the law which states that the person who inflicted an injury which could have caused death be liable to a more serious punishment.

The law states that a person found guilty of this crime is liable to imprisonment of not more than three years in jail.

The judges revoked the previous judgment and reduced Mr Demicoli’s prison term by three years.

Advert

17 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Jeremy J Camilleri

Sep 4th 2010, 09:03

Thanks for proving my point...

Joseph Vassallo

Sep 4th 2010, 09:08

Degiorgio, xi jkun l-atteggjament tieghek kieku l-kas gara fil-Filippini u l-vittma kien Malti u l-qattiel kien Filippino?

Jekk ghadek qatt ma' smajt li kullhadd (suppost) indaqs quddien il-ligi, m'intix kwalifikat biex tikkumenta.

Jien nghid li s-sentenza kienet hanina f'l-ewwel kas u ferm izjed f'l-appell. Imma nemmen li l-imhallfin sempliciment wettqu dak li hemm miktub fil-ligi u meta l-kas jigi quddiemhom, hekk biss jistghu jghamlu.

Il-ligi ma' tinkitibx mill-imhallfin imma mill-parlament

ANTHONY MANGION

Sep 4th 2010, 16:36

WHO SAID WE DONT KNOW THE PERSON ACCUESD.WE DO KNOW HIM AND HOW.

M Vella

Sep 3rd 2010, 22:00

Could not have put it better. Ipokresija ta' pajjiz twahhxek. Mur ara kieku bil-kontra x'ghageb shih fuq dan il-blog.

D.Galea

Sep 4th 2010, 00:18

Of course, a Maltese would have been burned at the stake before the accusations if possible!

D Vella

Sep 4th 2010, 08:29

My exact thoughts.

This Island racist?.Yes.

This People in self denial about it's own origins?. Wanna bet.

What does this judgement say about discrimination.Plenty.

a.attard

Sep 3rd 2010, 18:10

The victim was a foreigner... that's why!

Advert
Advert