Advert

PL's statement on climate change aimed at hindering government's plan to provide cleaner air - ministry

The Labour Party’s statement that the Climate Change Committee had changed its position about gas from its draft to the final strategy was aimed at hindering and misinterpreting the government’s plan for Maltese and Gozitan families to benefit from a cleaner air and improved health, the Resources Ministry said.

The PL’s spokesman for the environment, Leo Brincat, said that the government had abandoned a decision that the country should opt for natural gas within the next six years.

He said that this was done at the same time that the BWSC contract was signed. He claimed that this had set the tone for the use of a plant operated by other sources of energy, including heavy fuel oil.

But the Resources Ministry denied that there had been a change in strategy about the use of gas.

It said in a statement that the committee was set up to propose measures to reduce green house gases. Both in its draft and in its final strategy, the committee made it clear that the measures should be implemented by the government only if their implementation led to a bigger reduction of greenhouse gases for each euro invested.

While Mr Brincat claimed that the reference to gas was removed in the final strategy because the number of recommendations had changed, what had actually happened was that the recommendation, which was originally numbered 21, was now numbered 35.

This clearly showed that Mr Brincat was wrong. The document also showed that the biggest amount of greenhouses emissions which had to be reduced would effectively be reached if the electricity generated was not generated from gas. This could also be seen by the first draft, which had also been debated in Parliament.

The committee, the ministry said, had drawn up 96 proposals the government could implement to reduce greenhouse gases. The opposition opted not to say anything during the public consultation period and rather than participate actively by moving solid proposals, Mr Brincat chose to instead move a 150-word motion in Parliament without making any suggestions. Such a complex subject merited much more seriousness than this.

Mr Brincat, the ministry said, had even been given a personal presentation of the strategy by the committee.

Advert

33 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

A. Calleja

Aug 31st 2010, 11:14

"In fact, all the cows in Malta cause more air-pollution than the power stations in Marsa and Delimara put together!"

Int trid ticcajta siehbi!! Jidhirlek li l-ammont ta' baqar li hawn f'Malta se jhalli dak l-effett! Mela hsibtek qed tghix l-Argentina!! Barra minn hekk, bl-argument tieghek nista neqirdu l-popolazzjoni Maltija ukoll... ghax tipproduci hafna gas li qed jhammeg l-atmosfera minn gol-kamra l-baxxa!

Sergio Caruana

Aug 31st 2010, 11:31

Joseph Cauchi remember how much EFA used to shout "money no problem"? So has it now become "problem no money"?

Joseph Cauchi

Aug 31st 2010, 11:38



@ A. Calleja,

Please have a look at this link http://animals.howstuffworks.com/mammals/methane-cow.htm and afterwards just google Cows Methane Gas and you can have more information if you kindly require, otherwise it would be much wiser if one looks before one leaps!

JC.

Dave Ciappara

Aug 31st 2010, 11:58

Joseph Cauchi Are you living in this galaxy Cauchi? DO you think that any country or government would want to have to rely on foreign suppliers for all its food needs? Come back to earth Cauchi and stop bringing excuses to defend your indefensible government qassatat.

Joe Borg

Aug 31st 2010, 12:00

Joseph Cauchi were you by any chance referring to the fat cows that have been milking the Maltese citizens of their money such as the PN government and the famous contractors who get all the tenders including those who receive commissions like the €4,000,000 one for the power station extension?

Darren J. Galea

Aug 30th 2010, 23:54

"All this FUSS about the pollution is nothing more than SCARE-MONGERING!"

Are you for real or is this a new genre of comedy? Desperate times call for desperate measures Heheh ;)

A. Calleja

Aug 31st 2010, 01:19

"This whole question of the Power Station Saga boils to one thing and that is if the Maltese consumer is prepared to pay those extra 30% in the utility rates..."

Cikku l-Poplu wants to know all the truth on how this will affect his health BEFORE how this will affect his pocket. Remember: Health cannot be bought with money!

Anthony Briffa

Aug 31st 2010, 08:00

Furthermore, the PL is failing to tell the electorate what would the capital investment in the required infrastructure to pipe and store gas be. The required, unless sourced from the "evil" EU would have to come out from the government budget, which means more taxes. The MLP/PL has never in its history embarked on any mega projects projects for the benefit of Malta and everytime something big is happening the panic in its quarters is tremendous and they resort to shout corruption. It had to be the PN in government to build hospitals , schools, a university, a new airport terminal, a new power station and now its extension, the ongoing city gate project, etc. And in all this manoeuvre to gain polital mileage, the PL failed also to mention who is the Maltese agent for the Izraelis. By the way I just remembered two white elephants, which the MLP constructed, namely the Red china Dock and the Marsa Ship Bulding.

Peter Korsten

Aug 31st 2010, 08:24

Do you have anything to substantiate that claim of 30%? Given that oil and gas prices fluctuate, it's a bit curious that you present this figure as if it were a fact, without providing a single shred of supporting evidence.

Salvinu Vella

Aug 31st 2010, 11:29

Anthony Briffa if you are ready to sacrifice yourself and your family because your Gonzi has chosen the most polluting HFO to scratch the back of friends and friends of friends we are NOT. Have you read about the large increase in cancer cases between 2004-2008 just published Briffa? This is what your Gonzi want to increase to get rid of more people before they reach pensionable age.

Anthony Briffa

Aug 31st 2010, 12:56

@ Salvinu Vella
Than the best thing to do is to revert back to candle light and avoid walking the streets which are full of pollution. If I were you I would start a campaign for people to scrap their cars and start using bycicles and horses as a means of transport. Like this we will have a pollution free environement.

The problem here is the political mileage that the PL is trying to gain from this project. The PL has nothing to offer and in the meantime is putting spokes in the wheels. In this whole affair there was nothing but scare mongering, mud slinging and threats of investigations by Dr Joseph if he will ever be returned to power, without telling us what he would have done to give give us a pollution free power station. Let us not be hasty like Dr Joseph and wait for the outcome from the exchange of correspondence between the EU and the goveernment.

abuhagiar

Aug 30th 2010, 21:56

Will we have higher electricity bill to pay or else to make it more simple which is most expensive Gas or Fuel oil because at the end of the day sorry to say so that's what counts.

Mario Galea

Aug 30th 2010, 19:46

@ Mr. M Pisani So according to YOU the climate will be OK ? We will not be affected this Heavy Fuel Oil Power Station? then read this: Benzo(a)pyrene is listed as a Class A carcinogen by the USEPA and is known to cause cancer in humans. To put these levels in perspective heavy oil contains more than 15 times the levels of Benzo (a) pyrene found in Kuwaiti crude oil and 73 times more Benzo(a)pyrene than No. 2 fuel oil. if you still cannot believe this then see here http://www.laohamutuk.org/Oil/Power/NTNHeavyOilMar09.pdf TRY TO GET THIS FACT STRAIGHT !!

Charles Zammit

Aug 30th 2010, 19:52

Mr. Pisani
You claim you are a follower of our national Climate Change policy. If Mr. Brincat has lied could you kindly illuminate us as to how the use of heavy fuel oil for our power station will improve the air quality as against a gas fired one?

Joe Busuttil

Aug 30th 2010, 21:06

So the opposition is aiming to hinder the gov.'s plan etc etc etc... Is this all you have to say you PN people? You amaze me. You PN apologists are in the same boat as us other citizens. You will breathe the same cancer causing air as we do and yet you try to paint your Gonzi PN as a savior. You will pay the penalty imposed on us by the EU if our govt. is found guilty as we will do through our taxes. And you accuse the PL of hindering operations to get a new power station going. Well,you leave me speechless.

T Camilleri

Aug 30th 2010, 21:14

M Pisani imissek tistħi int u il-gvern tiegħek Pisani. Ma tistħix tipprova tiddefendi lil Gvern ta' Gonzi li jrid imarradma aktar milli marradna s'issa billi juża l-HFO minflok diesel jew gass. Tant wicckom qgħad li lanqas għadkom tafu tistħu.

Advert
Advert