Sliema council probed again
'Allegations of political pressure not department's remit'
The Sliema local council is being investigated over payments to a company that collects separated waste in the town, a service all other localities are getting for free, The Times has learned.
“Investigations are also being carried out on some payments or financial commitments the Sliema council entered into for the collection of separated waste, which may be irregular,” local government director general Martin Bugelli confirmed yesterday.
He said the department had been alerted to the matter over the past few days.
Mr Bugelli said the council’s executive secretary was instructed to withhold a payment the Sliema council had to make to the company, which also operates the domestic waste collection service in the locality.
Under a national waste collection scheme to retrieve recyclable waste, councils are obliged to register with either Green MT or Greenpak. The companies collect the separated waste from bring-in sites and the service does not come at an expense for the councils.
Green MT and Greenpak collect money from eco-tax refunds due by the government to companies that produce packaging waste and are signed up to the scheme.
“All local councils except Sliema have honoured their obligation to join one of two separated waste collection schemes run by Green MT and Greenpak. The participation of councils in these schemes is not subject to tender because they do not involve payments,” Mr Bugelli explained
In some instances, councils have also negotiated a deal to receive some income from the scheme over and above the savings they make on tipping fees for domestic waste because recyclable material is removed from the waste stream.
The news of fresh investigations in Sliema comes a day after the locality’s mayor, Nikki Dimech, alleged he was pressured to sign a €1.2 million contract with Green MT just minutes before the council voted on the matter.
Mr Bugelli refrained from entering the political fray when asked whether he would be investigating the mayor’s allegations.
“Allegations that political pressure was being applied are not my remit. My concern is solely that of seeing that council decisions and operations are done according to law. At face value, it is apparent there is nothing to investigate as the allocation to Green MT is not by tender,” Mr Bugelli said, insisting he was not aware of any contract to the value of €1.2 million.
The minutes of the Sliema council meeting held on January 20 this year show that councillors of both political parties unanimously agreed on joining the Green MT scheme after both companies made presentations.
“For some reason, the decision of the council has not yet been implemented,” Mr Bugelli said.
Meanwhile, Green MT, a subsidiary company of the Chamber for Small and Medium Enterprises – GRTU, yesterday denied it was going to be awarded a €1.2 million contract.
It said the waste collection scheme would have cost the council no money. On the contrary, Green MT would have to fork out €332,000 in payments to waste collection contractors and about €4,000 to the council for a 24-month period.
The company said that, despite the council’s approval in January, the mayor had failed to sign the final contract.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
m.farrugia
Aug 29th 2010, 08:45
@Tabone Vassallo matul dawn l-ghoxrin sena li l-froga ilha tinhema inti kont parti mill-Partit fil-Gvern ghaliex ma tkellimtx qabel?
A Vella
Aug 28th 2010, 21:14
To get exempted from eco-contribution, businesses had to pay for the expenses involved in thto collect the separated waste for recycling. So, no local council should be paying anything to GreenMT or GreenPak. Leaving the political pressure issue aside for a minute, can authorities kindly answer this question: Is the Sliema council actually paying businesses for the separated waste that they are also claiming eco-contribution exemption from? If so, how much is Sliema council paying?
A.E. Camilleri
Aug 28th 2010, 18:23
Wouldn't the Executive Secretary have any say in the responsibility of most of the work at the L:C? Has the Sliema LC been having problems with its Executive Secretary these last months? Why hasn't any of these officials also been investigated so far, or so it seems? This latest issue is another serious accusation and one wonders why there is no mention in the LC minutes of any follow-up action? Does not the LC list all "pending issues" separately so that these are looked into on each and every subsequent LC meeting? Where is the management skills of the executive personnel? Or has the Secretary post been problematic for some reason still unknown to the public? We deserve some more light on this as well please. Anyhow, Sliema is in a mess, ALL ROUND, and whichever way to look at it. Wow!
R Cassar
Aug 28th 2010, 16:28
Trying to twist and cover up to protect PBO...
Allegations should be investigated always and not depending on the person involved...Mr Gonzi...If there is an allegation about the Sliema Council you do well to investigate, but if there is an allegation about PBO you should do the same!!! At least if you want to be a little credible!!!
D.Bonello
Aug 28th 2010, 16:08
Time for a change corruption is eating up the PN
T Camilleri
Aug 28th 2010, 14:11
The stink is getting stinkier.
Mario Tabone-Vassallo
Aug 28th 2010, 09:55
Pajjiz farsa. Froga ilha tithejja ghoxrin sena
Frans Sammut
Aug 28th 2010, 14:12
You can say that again, my friend.
T Camilleri
Aug 28th 2010, 17:40
Mario Tabone-Vassallo ghandek ragun. U kif tista' ma tkunx tinten meta tkun ilha tithejja 20 sena?