Updated: PN dismisses Sliema Mayor
The Nationalist Party said today that it had dismissed Sliema Mayor Nikki Dimech and no longer considered him as representing the party on the council. It added in a statement that it was also expecting his immediate resignation from the council.
The Times reported today that Mr Dimech had admitted to the police that he had asked a council contractor for a commission, in breach of financial regulations.The 33-year-old Nationalist mayor, an accountant and auditor by profession, told investigators that he had solicited a commission over the council’s contract management tender, police sources said.
Mr Dimech spent several hours being questioned at the police headquarters in Floriana yesterday. The police wanted to ask him about allegations of financial irregularities at the Nationalist-led council.
The PN said that Mr Dimech yesterday informed PN General Secretary Paul Borg Olivier about the police investigations.
Dr Borg Olivier told him that his position within the PN and as a Mayor and councillor was untenable and he therefore expected his resignation.
Since the resignation was not immediately forthcoming, the PN said it was declaring that it no longer considered Mr Dimech as a PN councillor and was awaiting his resignation from the council.
It said it expected high ethical standards from councillors elected in its name.
Mr Dimech will be the second PN mayor to step down in the space of a week after the resignation last Friday of Sta Venera mayor Elizabeth Vella.
Ms Vella resigned following an Auditor General’s report in which she told how she had received €80 as a donation to charity for allowing the council premises to be used for private lessons. The money was deposited in a bank account held jointly by the council and the parish priest.
Mr Dimech’s case is not over the fairy lights tender which had raised the authorities’ eyebrows about three months ago, although this tender featured in the questions he was asked by the police, the sources said.
Coincidentally, Mr Dimech was yesterday also called in by the Internal Audit Investigations Department within the Prime Minister’s Office. He could not attend since he was at police headquarters but is expected to reply to the department’s questions today.
This department started investigating the Sliema council after allegations of mismanagement of funds referred to it by the Department for Local Government.
During the course of this investigation, Mr Dimech remained away from the council offices and council meetings and then called two emergency meetings to discuss the future of the executive secretary who was instrumental in flagging the alleged irregularities.
The first urgent meeting was not held after Local Government Department head Martin Bugelli stopped it from going ahead because it was “illegal”, as it was going to take place at an earlier time than prescribed by law.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
107 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 14th 2010, 18:11
This is becoming a tragic farce now. First the police "sources" leak the contents of a statement to the press (nothing illegal about that ????? No Article 133 of Criminal Code, no Article 8 of Press Act ) and now an official statement from the police to deny a rebuttal. What is more alarming is that the police are insisting that the statement of X was "voluntary". It may be or it may be not. It is only in due process of law that these documents are filed and proof that the statement was voluntary is established.
That he was a nationalist mayor gives me more strength to press on these arguments. I am politically opposite, but humans rights are on the side of all.
As to his Constitutional Rights, one should read Art 39 of the Constitution. Trial is in a court of law. As to police duties, one should refer to the Criminal Code which stipulates that shall bring together with the accused all evidence etc. It does not say that first it should be whispered to the press.
Miriam Webster
Aug 14th 2010, 11:02
To read the comments below is to witness all that is wrong with the socio-political zeitgeist of Malta. Those in favour say aye, while those against say nay. Lemmings.
Mr. Dimech is an accountant, a member of a profession sworn to uphold the law of the land. His profession demands a high standard, avoiding even the appearance of a conflict of interest. By putting himself out in the public eye, no doubt relying on his profession to provide credibility to his own cause, he should know that the standard is even higher.
True or not, once an allegation surfaces, a real professional would step aside while the allegation is investigated. That is the golden standard in every civilized nation.
It is not our diminutive size that will always keep us in the wings on the world stage. It is the "what's in it for me" attitude of those who "serve" the nation. Only in Malta. Pity.
charles philip zammit
Aug 14th 2010, 00:22
from what was reported in other media it appears that now mr dimech is maintaining that he is not guilty. this has proved that dr brincats reasoning that a person should be judged only in a court of law as prescribed by the laws of malta is correct. the same media sources have been quoted to say that another pn councillor has been made to sign papers against mr dimech against her will and that after doing so she has burst out crying. again mr dimech was quoted as saying that as soon as the police interrogations had finished the nationalist party got to know what was said during these interrogations. this is shame on the police who divulged such information. Il kobba tidher imhabbla man
J Borg
Aug 14th 2010, 00:06
I agree with Dr. Brincat 100%!
You have no idea what you are put through when being investigated, and the first way out the police will give you after hours of psychological haressment and complete disregard for your wish to consult a lawyer, added to the fact that they guarantee that what ever you are being accused of will be leaked to the press...you take it.
The funny thing is that it is as Dr. Brincat has said, even though he has admitted, if there is no proof, it does not mean he would be found guilty.
I would expect half of these comments to be on a timesofmalta post which will say 'has been found guilty'!
As always, people just assume and comment without any regard for the law and how it works!
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 13th 2010, 14:20
An example from the UK. Ipswich Serial Murders 2006 :
"On 21 December 2006, the then Attorney General Lord Goldsmith issued guidance to the media after concerns were raised by Suffolk Constabulary about the coverage and potential prejudice of a future trial. Lord Goldsmith urged the media to show restraint in what they reported about the two suspects being held, for fear of prejudicing any possible trial. A senior prosecutor on the case, Michael Crimp, also expressed his concerns that media coverage could jeopardise the trial, stating:
“ Steven Wright stands accused of these offences and has a right to a fair trial before a jury. It is extremely important that there should be responsible media reporting which should not prejudice the due process of law". Have we learnt English but not English fairplay ?
Simon Agius
Aug 13th 2010, 14:43
Dr. Brincat,
I must agree that the media must show some restraint, and I believe the Times has shown such restraint. The comments below are written by the general public, (which is representative of society) and the anger and frustration shown below cannot be considered as irresponsible media reporting but the 'Vox Popoli'.
I think the reporting on the Times was fair and balanced, and this platfrom is a medium for the public to share their thoughts and is not considered to be 'reporting' per-se.
Are you of the opinion that this should not have been reported in the papers?
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 13th 2010, 20:40
"The media" is not restricted to reporting. Even comments printed (or online) are "media". If I write a libellous letter to the press, I will be held responsible even if it is not "reporting".
Secondly it is not fair that one reads before even a first sitting in court that a person "admitted". Unless there is some document read out in court, how do I know what was in it ?
The public has a right to be informed. The individual has also rights, foremost of which that of being judged (not by vox populi) by an impartial and independent tribunal, which hears both sides. (Art 39 of our Constitution, Art 6 Convention on Human Rights). The responsibility is striking the right balance. X may be guilty or not guilty. Who decides ? The information in a press report or vox populi ?
I object to this : "The Times reported today that Mr Dimech had admitted to the police that he had asked a council contractor for a commission, in breach of financial regulations."
George Poitier
Aug 13th 2010, 13:48
Hey people, please don't be confused, this is not about the money. It's about who fell out of favour and who is no longer serving their master as they are supposed to be doing. Those who do not bow down and serve thy master shall be sent to jail (figuratively). So beware.
Simon Agius
Aug 13th 2010, 14:28
Mr. Poiter,
Let's get things straight - primarily this situation IS apparently related to money. I very much doubt the police would be taking criminal action against an individual simply because the said individual fell out of favour with a political party. I think those days are long gone.
Let's be clear - I am in no position to judge this person, nor is it my intention to do so. However, according to reports, contractors are alleging that this person pressed for commissions on works in the locality. If this is proved to be the case I sincerely hope the guy get's what he truly deserves.
I think the Nationalist Party has some fault in all this. Why hasn't the party vetted their candidate? Why hasn't the party looked at the individual's aquaintances and the people he hangs around with to build a picture of the guy's lifestyle?
...to be continued
George Poitier
Aug 13th 2010, 18:46
Very well, granted to some degree. But can I dare you, to mention who his mentor was? . Who helped him climb that ladder (the political one). Why they fell out lately ? Dare you to tell us why the sudden PN attack over (may I say this) silly commissions request, when such a thing is so often flagrantly abused, that it seems like the norm on this Island?. Over a mere 80 euro and maybe a few hundred euro in this case. Where others face millions of fraud and outrightly deny it?. Do please tell.
Carmel Garcia
Aug 13th 2010, 12:30
Who are we to judge? He who has no sin throws the first stone. And is there anyone beneath God who is without sin? White graves from the outside... Let the courts decide. Bil-malti hadd ma jara hotobtu, ghax jaqa' u jmut zobtu. He is still presumed innocent.
A Caruana
Aug 13th 2010, 13:40
How can you call him innocent if he himself ADMITTED that he had asked a council contractor for a commission?
A Borg
Aug 13th 2010, 14:10
@ A Caruana
The council "contractor" is nobody but an ex-council contract's manager who was sacked by the council with a vote of 9-1 last March and this is his vile way of revenge...There is much, much more to the story than is being said, or rather the story is quite different...
R.Borg
Aug 13th 2010, 11:55
Well done.
A swift decision.
Eyes and ears open for more of this stuff.
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 13th 2010, 10:13
I reaffirm my objections, in all good consciencem especially since the person involved does not belong to my political affiliation.
People should not be judged by the press. The press is covered by Art 33 of the Press Act to report faithfully proceedings in court.
"Admitted to the police" - Do you remember the case of that young man who admitted to the police about the rape in Floriana, and it turned out that someone else was responsible ? I just say wait for the evidence and then form your personal opinion. It is not even fair then to publish those "private" opinions.
Regarding prescription in cases of corruption. The problem is that the corrupter and the public figure (and now corruption applies also to the private sector, such as corrupting a purchasing officer of a company) have an illicit bond between them. If he happens to remain in power for twenty years, and he was corrupt to his nose in the first two years to insure himself for the future, should he enjoy immunity ?
rodnick abdilla
Aug 12th 2010, 23:11
nicky poggew lilek fuq il platt tas sagrificju .
Stefan Kottmann
Aug 12th 2010, 18:18
Was he assisted by a lawyer? Of course not. But then, he belongs to the same party that made a mockery out of the 'right to a lawyer' as known in Europe, so...
Charles Micallef
Aug 12th 2010, 17:48
If we really believe in democracy, bloggers should reserve their comments after the Law Courts convicts or dismisses the charges, as otherwise you are participating a kangaroo Court !
John Vella
Aug 12th 2010, 17:24
Poor guy. Victim of a witch hunt. We would not have a 4.1 billion euro national debt if public figures all toed the line. How about a thorough investigation to find out where all this money went before we are asked to pay it?
JOe VELLa
Aug 12th 2010, 16:42
Sir,
I agree with Dr. Joe Brincat let justice take its course.
Let me remind my learned friend from where we come. In the 60's PN had a two room headquarters in St. Paul's Str., MLP (LP now) a couple of rooms in Marsa.
My goodness we need a big yardstick for justice to take its course to explain from where the PN/LP got all the donations (joke) to built their Headquarters.
Is it donations or kickbacks?
The smell of corruption is all over, and only the fry are caught. Do I need to say more!
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 13th 2010, 13:12
As far as I am concerned ! When I was responsible for Party Affairs in the MLP, we are at Marsa (Shipbuilding area) and then at Macina. When the Centru was built I was out of politics. But I remember years back during a fund raising activity in the then Rialto Theatre Cospicua, I coined the phrase "Ahjar il-ftit tal-hafna milli l-hafna tal-ftit" (Better pence from many, than pounds from a few). It seems to have caught as an expression. As far as I know the MLP had to raise substantial loans to build the Centru at Hamrun.
JOe VELLa
Aug 13th 2010, 15:46
During those days I was active member too. Yes we worked hard to manage enough finance to pay for the daily needs. I remember it was common during the financial report that saying we are not so good financially.
I assume the other party had similar difficulty. Especially when the banks was going to take their property as they where behind in payment.
But than paw something happened and in a few years one party out lavashed the other in their headquarter building.
I have always been taught money do not grow on trees!
If quick money came from those who had money. In my books it is called kickback to reciprocate for service rendered.
C Galea
Aug 12th 2010, 16:37
Wonder what would happen to him if he went swimming naked at St Georges Bay ?
Prime minister any idea? Any from the police?
John Carmel Navarro
Aug 12th 2010, 16:31
I must echo Dr Joe Brincat’s statement, how come this case has just come to light and it seems it’s all but dealt with through the press. I am somewhat amazed that this can actually happen within the Maltese legal system, surely there has to be a full investigation dare I say there could be more than meets the eye and one cannot rule out other people involved. I cannot blame people smelling something amiss!!!
Bernice Debono
Aug 12th 2010, 16:31
Give us this day our daily bread and forgive our trespasses AS WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO TRESPASS AGAINST US, lead us not into temptation and deliver us from evil, amen.
A man also asked Jesus “How many times shall I forgive my brother, seven times?” and Jesus said “seventy-seven times”.
How much better would the world be if people especially those in the media and media columnists were to take heed of Our Lord's prayer and the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ especially those who persistently seek to put everyone in a corner and then when they are put in a corner themselves seek their pound of flesh.
Pierre André Aquilina
Aug 12th 2010, 15:55
"It said it expected high ethical standards from councillors elected in its name."
What about the MPs elected in its name? And civil servants hired by those MPs? Are these expected to exhibit high ethical standards? Essentially, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. May all our MPs and civil servants examine their consciences and reflect whether what has been admitted by Mr. Dimech is a symtom of a malaise that is rooted far deeper.
"I had a flair for languages. But I soon discovered that what talks best is dollars, dinars, drachmas, rubles, rupees and pounds f**** sterling."
"They say evil prevails when good men fail to act. What they ought to say is, evil prevails."
Mark Piscopo
Aug 12th 2010, 15:35
Il flus tal L-iskandlu tal VAT XSAR MINNHOM?
What a Shame on the PN Mayor of Sliema!!
D Molinos
Aug 12th 2010, 15:29
This man has been tried and convicted before he's even entered a courtroom. What's this,trial by the mob?
John Buttigieg
Aug 12th 2010, 15:16
Well done to the PN for expected high ethical standards from councillors elected in its name.
http://johnpisani.net/kronaka/?p=4798
Gharb
E. Azzopardi
Aug 12th 2010, 14:03
Very unfortunate. All this waste of time for the council and therefore for the people of Sliema. . .
Whilst this was going on, othercouncils where working with the Central Government on what streets and roads they need to be taken care of in their locality. Sliema got nothing. One locality got 57 streets! That is justice for you.
Many reports to the council (COLABORATING NOT COMPLAINING - many need to distinguish between these two, although a justified complaint is legitimate) have not been acted upon.
Having said this, I hope that the council starts functioning properly immediately.
Joe Sammut
Aug 12th 2010, 13:14
Dan hu l-haruf tas-sagrificcju !!!!!!!!
Karl Consiglio
Aug 12th 2010, 12:30
Is he the only mayor guilty of such a crime? I doubt it.
A. Borg
Aug 12th 2010, 12:12
Min hu bla htija jwaddab l-ewwel gebla.
Raymond Camilleri
Aug 12th 2010, 12:41
bull!! So you are excusing asking for 'a commission' by a public officer? unbelievable.... shame
J Farrugia
Aug 12th 2010, 15:23
l-arroganza hi li ghadu s'issa 3pm li ma tefax ir-rizenja tieghu minn sindku. Dik hija l-arroganza mela nitfghu l-ewwel gebla. allahares nitfa l-ewwel gebla ghax nghafgu tahta.
lgalea
Aug 12th 2010, 16:01
I'm just waiting for the LP to suck out all the political capital they can out of this story.
Fenech MD
Aug 12th 2010, 16:07
Ghalfejn? Mela qed tahsibna qeghdin nghixu 2000 sena ilu? Trid thaggru?
Bl-istess argument tieghek nistghu ma nharrku lil hadd, hadd ma jitressaq il-qorti, hadd ma jmur il-habs etc. Allura se nhallu dil-korruzzjoni kollha ghaddejja qisu qatt ma kien xejn?
Ahna dejjem tghallimna li kull azzjoni iggorr maghha konsegwenza. Hu ghamel dal-pass minn rajh u konxjament.
Jon Attard
Aug 13th 2010, 01:48
Jien nasal inwaddablu anke barriera ... bla misthija, meta jiena ikolli nhallas 35% taxxa fuq il-maggor parti tal-income tieghi + 18% VAT fuq kollox + kontijiet tad-dawl ezorbitanti .... ++++.
H Caruana
Aug 12th 2010, 11:38
Resigning would be the most respectable thing to do in such circumstances. However, could this be a case of picking on the smaller fish to alienate people from more serious cases? Over the past months there have been several news reports on the close links between politics and business which raise serious doubts on the integrity of the persons concerned. Are we limiting our interpretation of corruption solely to monetary rewards? Does political accountability solely cover the direct involvement of the people concerned whilst excluding responsibility for serious wrongdoings which have occurred within ministries, departments, etc that tarnish the whole credibility of the government? These are elements that we must also take into consideration.
sam galea
Aug 12th 2010, 11:34
booooo...why did he do that?
Victor Laiviera
Aug 12th 2010, 11:32
Allegations that the Mayor of Tas-Sliema solicited a commission are promptly (and rightly) investigated, leading to his resignation.
Yet in the case of the power station tender, the police and the government flatly refused to investigate well-founded allegations. This despite a damming report by the Auditor hi8mself.
Why?
Joe Vella
Aug 12th 2010, 13:37
@ Victor Laviera
The usual PL spill. If there was any evidence of corruption in regards to the Power Station, I am sure the Auditor General would have called in the Police Commissioner to investigate. Joseph Muscat and the PL with their Cry of rampant Corruption are still to take one case to the Police Commissioner for investigation.
Anthony Mizzi
Aug 12th 2010, 20:24
There are "commissions" and there are "COMMISSIONS" !
There are small fry and there are SHARKS !
Gerad Cassar
Aug 12th 2010, 11:17
A chain of resignation of small fry. What about a chain of resignation of the big fish. The sharks still roam around Malta, and if you happen to enter their territory you will not escape without being bitten at your expenses.
This case refers to a few hundred Euros. What about the millions contracts.
ms ghoare
Aug 12th 2010, 11:12
WHAT A BIG DIFFRENCE BETWEEN SLIEMA MAYOR AND STANTA VENERA
I cannot see why they were put in the Same level
The Santa venera Mayor donation and her money donated to a good cause = GOOD
The Sliema mayor reportedly took commission for himself to line his pocket =VERY BAD
TEMPTATION TO STEAL or TEMPTATION TO BE HONEST
SWORN IN TO DO A GOOD JOB AND BE HONEST ,WHAT A SHAME mud will stick forever
SHAME
Dr. Etienne A. Calleja
Aug 12th 2010, 16:56
Not all that is irregular is necessarily shameful. In the case of the Sta. Venera Mayor, as reported, the mayor had to step down because she did not observe regulations - one of them being that no council may give any donation - to charity or otherwise (Art. 63A, chap. 363). The mayor in this case had to step down for correctnesses sake....if for nothing else. In reality, still waters run deep and there may be more to this story than meets the eye.
However, in the Sliema case, things are certainly different and, whilst the principle of the presumption of innocence must not ever falter, if the allegations as ascertained in the press prove to be founded in a court of law, then certainly the just desert will be meted out only by the presiding judge or magistrate seized of the case. I do not think I am mistaken in saying that the Sliema mayor has already been sanctioned by the party's internal mechanism.
Michael Catania
Aug 13th 2010, 15:55
My question is this when did St. Venera ex mayor received the "rental "payments and when did she donate them to charity. Was there a time lapse.
Robert Calafato
Aug 12th 2010, 11:01
As the Yanks say, "Money talks and Bull S**t walks "
Forget Christian values, there is only one value in this country!!
Stephen Florian
Aug 12th 2010, 11:45
How true !
AZammit
Aug 12th 2010, 10:54
Ok, the Mayor has resigned - but what about the contractor involved, is action being taken againest him, and are his dealings with any other Council being investigated ??????
Dr Joe Brincat
Aug 12th 2010, 10:53
I am perturbed that, on account of a press report, a person (whatever his colour or creed) is being charged, convicted and almost sentenced here. Maturity requires that one reserves judgment in such cases, until all the facts are out. One may form a personal opinion. But everyone has a right to a fair trial. This is different from a report of investigative journalism, when the press uncovers what the authorities failed to find out. That is the duty of the press. But it is against all principles to have a trial by the press.
What further perturbs me is the statement that police sources said "that he admitted". I do believe that it is the duty of the police to investigate, but I think that what they have to say should be in a court of law.
Regarding legal problems with corruption, I hope that the long awaited amendment to the criminal code be introduced, so that corruption whatever time passes shall be still subject to the law (ma jkunx hemm preskrizzjoni)
Andrew Gatt
Aug 12th 2010, 13:20
In Malta, the Press uncovers NOTHING. Investigative journalism? Bet they can barely spell it!
Reporters are force-fed press releases galore, they rush panting to cover hastily-called Press Conferences about boring and uninteresting no-news for more spoonfeeding, The PN press slam Labour at every opportunity and keep a deafening silence about their party's sins. The MLP press do exactly the same in reverse.
There there are the so-called independents, who in reality often have personal axes to grind, who splurge out so-called news that is badly reported, biased, or outrageously untrue.
We may have press freedom but we also have too many emasculated hacks whose will to investigate is ZILCH. The curse of a small country where everyone is someone else's relative/friend/partner/co-worker etc.
Dr. Etienne A. Calleja
Aug 12th 2010, 17:06
I beg to differ somewhat with a highly respected and distinguished colleague. Whilst in agreement with the majority of what you have written Dr. Brincat, I cannot see the merits of having an amendment allowing for a prosecution for any criminal offence to run into perpetuity.
I am of the opinion, such as it is worth, that the removal of a prescriptive period in thesse cases could lead to abuse - and I do not think that the deterrent of punishing the abuser would manage to deter! Apart from this, I also think that it's somewhat unrealistic. Besides, if there already exists a prescriptive period for, arguably, the most heinous of crimes - that of wilful homicide (in the event that the accused is known), defilment of minors, rape (statutory or therwise) to mention a few - then I do not see why action for a much lesser offence as corrupt practice should not be allowed to extinguish itself after the lapse of a reasonable period of time.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Aug 12th 2010, 17:14
As a layman who never studied law I am inclined to think that when the police are investigating a public figure and find enough evidence to conclude that their suspect can be charged with a crime, the general public would have a right to know what led to the results. Naturally sensitive data would be preserved to be used only in the court room. What’s so bad to perturb you about a police statement that their suspect admitted his crime\s? We see the American and British police on television dishing out much much more information than what we are accustomed to in Malta. Why do we (the people) always expect and accept less information than our fellow Europeans and the Western world?
Ian C Ellul
Aug 12th 2010, 10:35
Prosit lil gvern ghas-serjeta li biha qed isiru l-investigazzjonijiet, minkejja l-fatt li s-sindku jirraprezenta lil-gvern stess.
Dr. Etienne A. Calleja
Aug 12th 2010, 17:07
Is-sindku ma jirraprezentax lill-Gvern stess! Jirraprezenta, semmai, lill-partit.
mpace2
Aug 12th 2010, 10:32
Can the NET T.V reports this now its flash bolt in the coffin ribbon in P.N hearts because its only reports mistakes been done by Labour leaning personnal - that why they are losing viewers day by day please be more liberal minded station
Michael Seychell
Aug 12th 2010, 13:22
Mr Pace your are wrong, the incident of the Santa Venera Mayor was given as much importance on the NST News as much as any other news item, despite the fact that in this case the 'commission' - or rather payment in lieu of rent - was for charity. Furthermore the Mayor herself took out of her pocket 20.00 Euro to increase the sum which was deoposited in the Bank, and apart from this the Bank Account was opened jointly with the Parish Priest for a just cause.
Unfortuately despite the good intentions of the Mayor ,what she did was irregular, and she was reponsible enough to accept her 'mistake' and resign.
There are Mayors who have been investigated for much more serious cases and they are still holding to their seats, or left for a higher position.
Last week I mentioned the case of a Mayor who was responsible for an expenditure of Lm7000.00 to clean the beaches of his locality albeit there are no beaches in his domain, and as far as I know this case was not even investigated.
Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta
denis degabriele
Aug 12th 2010, 10:25
temptation is the word and you have to be with a strong not to fall to this mis sup.
Henry J Bonett
Aug 12th 2010, 10:12
It is a rather sad situation. The parties themselves are to blame when they allow forces within their party to inexorably push their privately favoured individuals who do not have mayoral stature against others who may have. Besides being questionable in itself, this practice is usually exacerbated by the immaturity of voters who do not see through such obvious shenanigans because their glasses are too heavily tinted.
Dr. Etienne A. Calleja
Aug 12th 2010, 17:13
The elected Sliema mayor candidate was not, as you mistakenly assume in your comment, privately favoured. Au contraire.
Secondly, on the question of the voting general public, if you don't like the idea of democracy and prefer to have some genius like yourself instructing the general public on who to vote for, may I suggest that you emigrate to China. I'm sure they'll welcome you with open arms.
P.Cassar
Aug 12th 2010, 10:04
PERCEIVED CORRUPTION IS NOT ONLY PERCEIVED THEN !!!!!!
BUT HIGH UP, VERY HIGH UP, IS IT STILL CONCEALED (FOR NOW) ?
THE AUDITOR/S KNEW WHAT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT WHEN REFERRING TO hard EVIDENCE.
Leon Scerri
Aug 12th 2010, 11:02
Like most of my fellow citizens, at times I am duped in believing that corruption is being seriously tackled! Although this matter is quite serious, it as ‘small fry’ when compared to what the ‘fat cats’ are about!?
For instance why isn’t The Commission for the Administration of Justice held accountable for not broadcasting the outcome of the investigations carried out by the same Commission with regards to maladministration of justice!? What is motivating the Commission to keep the outcome of recent investigations under wraps? Is it too shocking for us, taxpayers to know? Whatever the outcome of such investigations, we have a right to know! This would put our mind at rest that our cases in Court are treated with utmost diligence and fairness!
Is it too much to ask!?
Leon Scerri
Dr. Etienne A. Calleja
Aug 12th 2010, 17:26
@ Leon Scerri.
Contrary to what you may think (shock and horror!) you do not have a right to know the goings on before the Commission for the Administratin for Justice, as the proceedings are held, according to law, behind closed doors.
Secondly, mistakenly for the second time, how is the aforementioned Commission going to 'be held accountable" ?
Thirdly, the Commission mentioned does not only deal with issues of maladministration, as you - for the third time in a row now- mistakenly think.
Fourthly, do you have a grieviance yourself, in that a case which you are involved in is not being heard fairly or with the utmost diligence. Because if you do, then I suggest that you take advantage of all the measures at your disposal to ensure fairness, timely judgment and diligence, last among which would be a report to the Commission.
If you haven't any such grieviance, or you don't even happen to have any case being heard and are just parroting what you hear from the grapevine, may I suggest that you act like the wise and keep the maxim that silence is golden and one should not speak unless to improve upon it.
IVAN GRIXTI
Aug 12th 2010, 09:45
Admittedly, as humans, we are all subject to make mistakes but I cannot understand how a person who like me is a member of the accountancy profession fell into such a temptation rather than setting an example!
Mark Portelli
Aug 12th 2010, 09:58
@ Grixti - I completely agree with you. Someone once told me that "Cash is KING"
A Abela
Aug 12th 2010, 10:20
Within each profession everyone can fall into temptation.
j. gatt
Aug 12th 2010, 15:11
Maintain your present attitude as, in your profession, you may be just one of a few, hopefully not unique.
In seems the small fry are expendable, maybe just just decoys, to the larger predators roaming free. The White Sharks.
Fenech MD
Aug 12th 2010, 16:10
Bhal ma ghamel l-imhallef Arrigo?
Allura se nibqghu nittolleraw kollox, bl-iskuza li ahna umani u nistghu naqghu ghat tentazzjoni?
g. scerri
Aug 12th 2010, 09:40
When one considers the cost of running local councils, including the regular elections, and also any benefits obtained, do people still think that tiny Malta needs all this extra government?
Also while it is commendable for the department in question to investigate local councils, is it equally commendable for a political party to actually dismiss councilors that stood in its name? How many layers of government does this poor island actually have?
Joe Fenech
Aug 12th 2010, 09:35
Now we expect that the case involving the VAT personnel involved in the notorious fraud case is re-opened and people getting what they deserve: long years of community work and pay-back of the stolen money.
It is beyod belief that such a serious case has been brushed off as if it was something trivial!
l fenech
Aug 12th 2010, 10:02
Hear hear. I agree with you completely. I was fined for a Vat late return during a postal strike.
victor pulis
Aug 12th 2010, 10:02
The bigger the crime the bigger the chance of getting away with it.
Karl Axisa
Aug 12th 2010, 09:26
It is a heart breaking news, a let down, to read about a young person with a future at hand, resorting to such measures for the sake of an easy buck. What happened to self respect? What happened to self discipline? What happened to civic responsibility? Who in the PN is responsible in vetting such people before they are out in the public sphere? This young man here, held the position of mayor, he was not not some donkey man. Was/is he aware of his responsibilities? Should we keep a lookout on people who vie, struggle, aim for important posts with eagerness? Could such enthusiasm be hiding an agenda which might not always turn out to be for the good of society at large? Has such an attitude become common place in the PN, that s/he responsible for selecting councilors and promoting mayors, has grown indifferent to such important issues? Quo Vadis?
Philip Vella
Aug 12th 2010, 09:22
Ghumbad issib xi nazzjonalist jitkaza ghax JAM sar president onorarju tal FKNK, ahjar taraw dawn l affarijioet hbieb!!
A Abela
Aug 12th 2010, 10:21
U il-Fgura x'gara? Hadd ma jaf.
gcForte
Aug 12th 2010, 09:15
@@@...... Before starting pointing your finger, do remember that the other three are pointed to yourself........Il Malti jghejd " li min isib il hawt ta l-ilma mbierek kullhadd ibil subajh ". u cuc hu min ma jghamilx hekk. Kieku jien ninhasel kollni, u mhux inbil subajha biss. Xi hadd kien qal li " Min ma ghandux l-ebda dnub jibda igara l-ewwel gebla " hemm xi hadd volontier jew ? Naqbel hafna ma dak li kitbet Marija Falzon.
victor pulis
Aug 12th 2010, 10:11
gcForte jekk tiddecidi tohrog ghall kunsill nivvutalek!
Karl Axisa
Aug 12th 2010, 11:01
Mr Forte are we condoning malpractice? If yes, then no wonder the quagmire. No matter how many fingers there are pointing at me when i point at others' dishonesty, you cannot deny that wrong doing did not take place. I do reckon that people in glass houses should not throw stones..its true and s/he who is free from sin can cast the first stone..that is also true . But shall we call a spade a spade please? I try to lead by example and try as hard as I can to stick to principles such as honesty and self respect. Whether i succeed that is not up to me to judge. You can never deny or hide the fact that a young person was given a chance in a top most position and failed himself and those around him miserably. Does this make part of Visjoni 2015...Ghamilha tighek?
gcForte
Aug 12th 2010, 11:58
@ Karl Axisa.........I did not say or agreed with what the Mayor has done, although I might have done the same. What I want to say is,that as long as we are human beings, and we still have a mirror at home, before playing it " SAINT " we look at it, see if we or others from our close family, got or made a sin,see that every one is clean, then start throwing stones. I do not look at it from the political side, all those involved in politics are subject to do wrong as well, who ever they are.The Maltese says " Ix xitan l-ewwel jghatik li trid u wara idoqq it trumbetta bik " And please stop blaming every body, life will goes on even for Nikki Dimech ( which I do not know or support the party he represented ) The English say " Live and let live
Lina Caruana
Aug 12th 2010, 09:10
From the positive point of view it is good that many instances of incorrect behaviour is uncovered and dealt with . That is a positive step forward. What is worse is that people who should give evidence of wrong doing do not come forward . Without evidence sackfuls of wrong doing remain at the level of allegations. They would not remain so if collaborated by as many individuals as were in cognizance of true facts. Why should one need a politician behind him to do it? Another positive fact is that if there are more cases uncovered we are endorsing the fact that wrong doing is strongly undesirable. Continue to show it and circumstances will improve by the grace of God.
Charles Sammut
Aug 12th 2010, 09:03
What the police Economics Crime Unit should investigate is the source of hundreds of thousands of euros spent by certain European Parliament canditates during the last MEP election. But those seem to be above the law.
Stephen Farrugia
Aug 12th 2010, 10:28
@ Charles Sammut:
Don't worry, the repercussion of no action by all those responsible, will be that any election in the future will NOT BE RECOGNIZED because it will be illegal. Malta has a future with NO government, according to law. Fixing the financial law now, is not even enough because the past has to be corrected in full now.
Stephen Farrugia - Rightwing Social Democrats
Stephen Farrugia
Sean Grima
Aug 13th 2010, 14:33
that fact that YOU will not be recognising them is irrelevant
Anthony Borg
Aug 12th 2010, 08:57
No wonder people become sceptical.
Trust and honour are being thrown to the wind...and when trust is lost in public figures, people become disillusioned.
We had public figures of all shades fall from grace...yes we are all human and weak: but when you have magistrates and judges, priests, two former Police commissioners, politicians and now mayors committing such errors...one wonders what next...!
C. Farrugia
Aug 12th 2010, 08:53
I pity the *man in the street*, who perceives ANY PROFESSIONAL as *Holier than Thou*.
r ferriggi
Aug 12th 2010, 08:50
while this is shameful,,,,,
is there ANY doubt that the world ( and especially malta) goes round by such things??
this is daily reality,,, in all aspects of modern life. i am in no way justifying this.
Joe Zerafa
Aug 12th 2010, 08:33
Kulhadd jizbalja, ghax ahna tad demm, u il laham. U min jizbalja ihallas. Izda huwa zball li jihu il htija kollha, hu u il partit kbir taghna. Tinsghux il korruzjoni li kien, ghadu, u jibqa mifni bijha il partit tal haddiema (lol).
Marija Falzon
Aug 12th 2010, 08:15
Mela Sindku ghandu l-guts jammetti li zbalja u jirrizenja fuq ammont relattivament zghir. Imma fit-tahwid tal-BWSC, hemm Alla jbierek kollox sar sew, kulhadd vergni u pur, u kulhadd zamm postu ghal iktar pappa. Hurray.
Fenech MD
Aug 12th 2010, 08:58
U tal-VAT x'sar minnhom? dawk il-miljuni?
mario azzopardi
Aug 12th 2010, 08:05
Is this the tip of the iceberg??
Charles J. Buttigieg
Aug 12th 2010, 08:27
yes
L. Galea
Aug 12th 2010, 08:35
No it's the iceberg of the tip. And the top.
Joe Fenech
Aug 12th 2010, 09:32
That's VERY obvious!
Why do you think most people get involved?
WELCOME TO TANGENTOPOLI!
J Farrugia
Aug 12th 2010, 08:04
This sliema case has nothing to do with the St Venera Case. The ex Mayor of St venera should be commended for her altruism and should never have resigned. St Venera community is now less rich without this altruistic mayor.
Cspiteri
Aug 12th 2010, 08:03
Can't help wondering whether this is an isolated case or whether this sort of petty corruption exists in other councils. And before the usual characters start their political mud-slinging, I'm referring to councils run by both parties.
Andrew Cachia
Aug 12th 2010, 07:47
do we have legislation that allows for a reduced sentence should the accused is persuaded by the police to expose others in such situations. i feel that this is just the tip of the iceberg and more should be done especially with in government procurement departments
Charles Zammit
Aug 12th 2010, 07:42
Shame, shame and shame!!!
If proved, this is a more serious crime given the professional status of the person involved. No sympathy for such people.
Joseph Scicluna
Aug 12th 2010, 07:30
you should hung down your head in shame and make a public apology to the maltese people and the pn.
Joe Mangion
Aug 12th 2010, 07:22
Corruption and sleaze has become the order of the day. This is the vision we have towards making Malta a centre of excellence. Investment suffers where corruption is rife. The country needs new management.
C Gatt
Aug 12th 2010, 09:27
@Mr Mangion
has become? twas ever thus!
Joe Vella
Aug 12th 2010, 09:55
@ Joe Mangion
Perhaps you are to young or have a very short memory to remember the '70's and the '80's. In those days corruption was institutionalized and the corrupt was politically protected. The residents of Fgura are still awaiting for an explanation as to why their Mayor was forced to resign without any public explanation as to why never given.
N Portelli
Aug 12th 2010, 11:30
@ Joe Vella
Why do some people like you keep mentioning the 70's ans 80's, when we are in 2010? That is history! Let us, for one instance say the 70's and the 80's were governed differently, what would Malta be like now? I seriously doubt that we would be living in Heaven on Earth!
And about corruption, I totally agree with J Oatmon!!
J Oatmon
Aug 12th 2010, 07:21
I would say for every case made public, ten more cases slip by unnoticed.
I blame the government for the obviously feeble law enforcement, and the courts for mickey mouse sentencing, in corruption cases.
There does not seem to be a long term plan for any of the problems we have; it seems to me that we have a 'quick and easy fix' approach to problems, where we avoid tackling the difficult long term problems in depth.
Alex Chetcuti
Aug 12th 2010, 07:19
Equally and just as disturbing is that public money is being held in a bank account held equally between the Council,a Government/Public body and a private individual such as a parish priest(as in St Venera).. As far as I know my taxes are paid to the Government and no private individual has the right to administer public funds. Yet another example of muddled thinking. What about that Secular State,when's it happening?
joseph azzopardi
Aug 12th 2010, 07:18
There are more rats to be checked and done away with. But some are shrewer than others even if not educationally bright.
Patrick Sacco
Aug 12th 2010, 14:13
How true!