Victim’s father seeks correction over luggage allegation on TV
Air Malta “is following developments” after Scottish Television on Monday reiterated the allegation that the Lockerbie bomb was loaded in Malta in an unaccompanied luggage.
“Air Malta is following the story as it develops and we will be in a better position to comment further at a later stage,” a spokesman for the national carrier said when asked whether the company was going to protest its innocence.
The airline had threatened court action some years ago when Granada TV had broadcast a similar allegation and the station had to reach an out of court settlement.
The airline has always denied it transported unaccompanied luggage.
The STV programme was aired on the first anniversary of the release from a Scottish prison of the only man convicted of the bombing, Libyan Abdel Basset al-Megrahi.
The 1988 attack on Pan Am flight 103 over the Scottish town of Lockerbie killed 270 people.
The father of one of the victims, Jim Swire, yesterday wrote to STV asking them to correct the wrong impression given by the programme that the fatal bomb was loaded in an unaccompanied luggage on an Air Malta flight in Luqa.
According to the prosecution, the luggage containing the bomb was transferred in Frankfurt to a London-bound flight where it was again transferred to Pan-Am flight 103.
Dr Swire has long maintained that Mr al-Megrahi is innocent and has challenged the prosecution’s case implicating Malta. He maintains the bomb was introduced at Heathrow airport during a break-in the night before the fatal flight.
Mr al-Megrahi was released on compassionate grounds by the Scottish authorities last year after doctors said he was unlikely to live more than three months because of cancer.
The Libyan’s survival for a whole year has enraged victim relatives, who believe Mr al-Megrahi’s release was part of a trade-off between the UK and Libya involving economic interests.
In comments to STV, Dr Swire talked of his “unshakeable belief” that the circumstances of his daughter’s murder “have become wrapped up in a tissue of lies”.
The prosecution’s main plank during the trial was Sliema merchant Tony Gauci who identified Mr al-Megrahi as the one who bought clothes from his shop days before the Lockerbie bombing. Fragments of clothes from the Lockerbie crash site were traced back to Malta and Mr Gauci’s Sliema shop.
However, serious doubts were cast on Mr Gauci’s testimony because the identification of Mr al-Megrahi came only years later after the witness had seen him pictured in a magazine as a Lockerbie suspect. In fact, over the past years, the credibility of the main thesis that saw Mr al-Megrahi being convicted was seriously called into question.
Mr al-Megrahi was a Libyan secret service officer stationed in Malta with Libyan Arab airlines but Malta has always denied the bomb was loaded at Luqa airport.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mark Sammut
Aug 11th 2010, 16:38
Mr al-Megrahi was released on compassionate grounds by the Scottish authorities last year after doctors said he was unlikely to live more than three months because of cancer. Guess what? He is still alive. UK did this to have oil drilling rights.
Gerry Cowie
Aug 11th 2010, 20:00
Whilst there is currently suspicion in the UK and abroad as to the involvement of the British in releasing this man, there is still a lot that has been hushed up. Mr Swire, himself affected by the crash, has consistently said that he does not believe the man jailed was actually responsible. There is lots of conflicting evidence and the need for somebody to be found guilty. The truth is that nobody really knows who actually carried out the bombing for sure.
What would we all do if it turned out that Al Megrahi was not guilty?
There is doubt and cover up surrounding this case from start to finish. I hope for everybody's sake that the truth comes out.
Jesmond Micallef
Aug 11th 2010, 23:09
What about the undercover drugs operation by the DEA agents in a notorious Syrian valley ?
Did these agents buy drugs in order to dope it somehow and then trace its route when it enters the USA ?
Did these DEA agents have diplomatic immunity which could have otherwise allowed them to board the plane without going through the normal channels ?
Could it be that they unknowingly carried the explosive device on board the plane, themselves ?
a.dalli
Aug 11th 2010, 15:57
@P. Camilleri.
The procedure in this case would have been to identify if your father had a checked in luggage. If yes this woild have been identified and off loaded from the aircraft.
Paul Camilleri
Aug 11th 2010, 16:34
The bags left without him and no they did not even notice he was not on the plane.
Manuel Spiteri
Aug 11th 2010, 15:49
In 1982 I was on stand-by and my bag went without me. Luqa airport has improved since this time.
Paul Camilleri
Aug 11th 2010, 15:01
One time, in the 1980s, my father slept in the waiting area and the plane left without him. Yes, it did happen.
Jesmond Micallef
Aug 11th 2010, 13:51
Maltese Authorities such as Transport Malta (DCA) should also make sure that any officially approved training material with regards to Aviation Security and Safety does not include any clear and specific indication of either country or airline involved in this case unless FACTUALLY based and PROVEN in court. Such matters should be taken up at EASA but also ICAO level, if need be. European aviation authorities should only approve legally correct training material and not "political junk".
I extend my heartfelt solidarity to Dr. Jim Swire and the other families of this cowardly act of terrorism. Indeed a father who is still struggling with closure in not knowing the truth behind his daughters murder.
T Camilleri
Aug 11th 2010, 09:59
AirMalta sue the TV station for its false allegations. They just want to blame AirMalta and Libya to cover up the UK blunders.