Air pollution contributors
Although not present for the press briefing, Albert Bezzina in the Talking Point titled Air Quality: An Alternative Agenda (August 3) erroneously asserts that the Malta Environment and Planning Authority has underplayed the role of the power stations in the contribution to poor air quality. What was in fact said during the press briefing is totally different. In fact, during the last monthly briefing session we held with the media, I stated that the two major contributors to air pollution in Malta are the power plants and road transport (which includes both private cars and commercial vehicles), however, road transport has a greater effect on our local air quality than the power plants. In fact, specialised modelling techniques will prove my point.
I would also like to point out that the Air Quality Plan for the Maltese islands targets both commercial vehicles and private cars. In fact, one of the proposed measures in this plan is the introduction of “low emission zones” in specified areas. This means that cars of certain emission category, for example Euro III and better, will only be allowed to pass through the zone while the passage of any other vehicle through the zone will be stopped, irrespective of whether the vehicle is commercial or private. In the plan, there is no discrimination made in any of the measures related to the traffic emissions between commercial and private vehicles. I would like to remind readers that out of the 38 measures included in the Air Quality Plan, 36 are aimed at curbing emissions from the transport sector.
I would also like to confirm the figures quoted during its media briefing, that the annual average nitrogen oxide concentration registered by Mepa’s traffic site in Msida in 2008 was 60.9 ug/m3 which is 52 per cent higher than the annual limit value of 40 ug/m3. It is also worth mentioning that the ambient levels of benzene registered by the same air monitoring station will become critical if the problem of excessive traffic passing through the area is not appropriately addressed. A quick glance at any textbook will confirm that benzene is principally emitted by petrol engines and in this case no argument could possibly exonerate private cars. It is not without concern that I note that certain people are more than ready to point fingers at other sources rather than take responsibility for the effect of their actions on the environment.
Mepa remains committed to the full implementation of the Air Quality Plan and I would like to take this occasion to reiterate my appeal that if the measures in the air quality plan will not manage to align our ambient air quality with the requirements of the directive, then Mepa will have the duty to recommend further measures in order to make sure that the limit values enforced by the ambient air quality directive are complied with, in the interest public health and our environment.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Raymond Cutajar
Aug 6th 2010, 22:31
@ C Cassar.-Spot On dear Sir, I carry out vrt tests and am involved in the field .
Could you please contact me or give the provider permission so as I will be able to contact you
AS to you / your employment position Sir, Mr Martin Seycell it is truly Tragic that you do not know what the situation Really IS IN THE VRT JUNGLE oh surely and positivly so; you are unaware otherwise you would have ordered an inquiry of the highest degree of what has been going on for the last 11 years of vrt testing that our democracy allows instead
If you wish you can contact the provider for my details
C Cassar
Aug 6th 2010, 12:39
As usual lots of discussion/talk but no action Mr Seychell. It's all very well quoting that low emission zones are planned for vehicles that meet Euro III or above but a Euro IV vehicle that's badly maintained will pollute as much as a non-Euro emmisions compliant vehicle. As we all know, vehicle maintenance in Malta is virtually non-existent. People either never service their vehicles until they have a problem and even if they do put their cars in for a service, most local mechanics have no clue/can't be bothered to look up manufacturers specifications.
Also, with a low emissions zone I'm sure you'll be applying an absolutely no exemption policy? This would be key to stop commercial vehicles claiming that their business would be hit if their non-Euro emission vehicles would be barred from the zone. Of course these vehicles should be barred overnight and NO compensation given to the owners since they have made huge amounts of money by never replacement of their vehicles for many, many years.
So when exactly are these low emission zones planned to start operating and where will these be? Action please this year (2010) not 2020. EXample, look at German cities.
Martin Seychell
Aug 6th 2010, 17:41
Mr Cassar, no exemptions are planned for low emission zones, as otherwise they would not really be low emissions zones. Prior notice of these measures is being given so businesses can plan their investments accordingly. I agree with your point regarding maintenance, which is why we are also recommending that Transport Malta further strengthens VRT tests. As regards the time frame for implementation, the measures in the Air Quality Plan must all be implemented within the next 1-2 years maximum if Malta is to meet the targets set by the Air Quality Directive. I hope this clarifies matters.
C Cassar
Aug 6th 2010, 19:16
Strengthen the existing VRT test? How will that make any difference to emissions since clearly so many vehicles go through the test and still belch out black smoke. This is particularly true of most commercial vehicles, even relatively new ones. The fact of the matter is that the VRT is not being applied correctly (or maybe knowingly incorrectly) to the majority of vehicles. Therefore, simply making the VRT more stringent will be useless unless the VRT is actually enforced unlike it is today. A classic example of this can be seen with the current bus fleet. Please explain to me why the majority of buses are clearly producing excessive toxic (both visual and unseen) emissions if we have a VRT in place? I don't believe that the current VRT is that poor that even when these buses have such a test applied they are still allowed onto the streets as they currently are. What seems to be happening is that buses are being unofficially 'exempt' from the current VRT. Tightening the VRT will make no difference to such vehicles and they would certainly not qualify to enter a low emission zone - so no buses on certain routes then.