Advert

Weather does talking on roofless theatre

For quite a while now, we have been hearing from the government how great the Renzo Piano plans for the roofless Opera House are. According to Lawrence Gonzi, Malta deserves a theatre that is different to the ones already in existence. So it seemed that according to the government all we deserve is a theatre that could only function in the height of summer. Now, we know that we can't even be sure of using it then! Let's look at what has happened in the past week.

A performance by the EU Baroque Orchestra was due to take place at the President's Palace courtyard in Valletta - this is protected enough, you would think. Apparently not, as this had to be moved at the request of the organisers to the Ambassador's Hall at the Auberge de Castille due to the humid weather. In the words of the organisers, "Such weather conditions wreak havoc on instruments in general but have a stronger effect on stringed instruments as they can affect tuning. This would have been exacerbated in the case of the baroque orchestra, which uses period instruments that employ gut strings that are even more susceptible to the weather."

Then we had the postponement of another concert, this time by Joseph Calleja, due to take place at the Granaries. In this case the postponement is due to strong winds. I can imagine Mr Calleja was saying, "I told you so" as he had already spoken out against the government's idea of a roofless theatre.

Dr Gonzi has stated in the press that the decision on whether or not to have a roofless theatre was left in the hands of Renzo Piano, which in my opinion is a disgrace.

What gives this government the right to hand over such an important decision to a foreign architect who is obviously blind to the real needs of the Maltese people? It would appear that Piano is right and 128 renowned artists are wrong with regard to this matter.

Therefore, in the light of what has happened in the past few days can I ask the government to justify its stand on this matter? Why is the government so anxious to accept the White Rocks deal and yet not even considering the Opera House deal from Architect Giovanni Trevisan who has promised that he can build a 1,200-seat theatre on the site of the Opera House at no cost to the government?

Like the White Rocks project, a consortium is offering to build top-class facilities in return for a 30-year lease on the property. Innocent enough...except for the fact that what the government has accepted at White Rocks, it's refusing at City Gate. This makes one wonder why it is so important to the government that this stupid roofless theatre proposal should go ahead, especially when the majority of Maltese people are opposed to it. It would be interesting to see if anyone within the present government has the courage to answer these questions.

Advert

10 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Martin Debono

Jul 31st 2010, 16:03

You presume to know it all about Malta and about where my and others' political inclinations lie. For your information, I'm 42 years old and have voted twice in my life. I couldn't care less whether Gonzi or Muscat is the next PM or whether the Valletta theatre has no roof or three sets of them on top of each other. I'm just happy that after 60+ years we will finally be rid of that dump. I do wonder however why someone who lives in northern Ireland gets all hot and bothered about Maltese politics and presumes to insult those who live here. I would have thought that you have enough things to worry about closer to home.

Advert
Advert