Advert

Court awards man €1,500 for violation of right to fair hearing

A man has been awarded €1,500 in moral damages after a court found that his fundamental human right to a fair hearing had been violated in the course of criminal proceedings filed against him.

Joseph John Gatt filed his constitutional application in the First Hall of the Civil Court against the Registrar of Courts, the Permanent Secretary in the Justice Ministry and the Attorney General.

He told the court that following a complaint filed by his wife, he had been charged, in February 2000, with domestic violence. The proceedings against him took over seven years to be concluded and he was finally acquitted of all charges in October 2007.

Mr Gatt claimed that this delay in the judicial proceedings was in violation of his fundamental human right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time.

Mr Justice Joseph R Micallef noted that the criminal action against Mr Gatt had been beset with irregularities. The proceedings against him had commenced in a summary manner but the Magistrates Court had then ruled, in July 2007 when the presiding magistrate had been changed, that the case ought to have been heard in a compilation of evidence.

In October 2007 it was once again decided to hear and decide the case in a summary manner and the court delivered judgment acquitting Mr Gatt of all charges later that month.

In today’s judgment the court concluded that there was no reasonable justification for the delays in Mr Gatt’s case, nor did he bear any responsibility for the delay. The case was not a complex one.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Sean Grima

Jul 30th 2010, 12:52

a point worth pondering about.

Sean Grima

Jul 30th 2010, 09:00

i do not understand why you are saying that we are being treated worse than immigrants. i certainly do not feel that way.

J. J. Borg

Jul 29th 2010, 17:59

You should educate yourself on what 'racial discrimination' is before throwing the phrase about in a meaningless way.

Sean Grima

Jul 29th 2010, 15:29

true, but had the maltese guy been awarded 12,000 euros, nobody would be complaining about public finances being wasted! but it does not matter that your human rights are violated, if you are not maltese!

Geoffrey Mifsud Farrugia

Jul 29th 2010, 16:02

public finances are being squandered and wasted day in day out...it all depends on who and for what. I can give you whole lists of events that were paid of from public finances in recent months that the country could have very well done without!

This person's human rights were violated too - 7 years is not an acceptable time frame for having your case decided especially in such a case as this one. i can justimagine what this guy had to go through during these 7 years.

Sean Grima

Jul 30th 2010, 08:59

yes i agree that his rights were violated and that he should be compensated too.

Advert
Advert