Advert

Green Party backs divorce case

Alternattiva Demokratika is supporting a lawyer who plans to institute a constitutional court case against the government which, she holds, is denying her the right of respect for family life by not allowing divorce.

The AD said it fully supported the case, which Lynn Zahra plans to institute soon.

Arnold Cassola, the party's spokesman on EU and international affairs, said Maltese and EU citizens residing in Malta were being discriminated against because they did not have access to divorce.

AD chairman Michael Briguglio said: "AD gives total political support to Dr Zahra's court case and we applaud her for her courage which is inspirational to thousands of other people in a similar situation."

Dr Zahra has lived with former Labour Cabinet Minister Joe Grima for more than 20 years and they have a child but, she complains, their family is not recognised as a legitimate unit, socially or legally.

She will file the case in October, based on various legal arguments, but has "no illusions" of winning in the Maltese courts. In fact, her aim is to take it to the European Court of Human Rights where she is certain Malta would finally be "forced" to allow couples from broken marriages the right to divorce. She hopes about 30 people will join her in her legal battle so they can share the expenses.

Advert

8 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Franco Farrugia

Jul 26th 2010, 17:37

You seem to forget that there are two levels of discussion regarding divorce. You only look at it from the viewpoint of what the RCChurch says.
Quote: ' I know of many that during the next coming of the General Election time many will be asking candidate if they are in favour of divorce or not and will be voting only to those candidates that declare themselves to be against the introduction of divorce in Malta.'
Well, likewise, many will doubtedly be asking candidates if they are in favour of divorce or not and will be voting only to those candidates that declare themselves to be IN FAVOUR of the introd. of divorce in Malta.

Lynn Zahra

Jul 26th 2010, 19:03

Mr.Meli, I don't blame you for being so short sighted. Daniel Taylor in his book called "Is God intolerant?" reminds us that it was Pascal who said the the greatest evil men have done throughout the ages is when they act according to their conscience. With the ideas I have on challenging the right todivorce, I may not have to go to the ECHR at all. Now, doesn't that idean scare you? In spite of those cases you quoted after reading threads by my colleagues who should know better than to comment on a case that a fellow lawyer is proposing , I will succeed and YES a ECHR judgement is not only enforcable in Malta, but Parliament will be forced to change the law! Believe me, I will slip in through the smallest window if I cannot go through the door, and succeed in getting there. The Maltese can no longer remain with their heads buried in the sand on such a sensitive issue.........its not being Christian to deny people who are suffering a second chance.

Raymond Bezzina

Jul 27th 2010, 07:59

@ Dr. Lynn Zahra

Dr. Zahra
Divorce does not mean a second chance. Divorce means that a person can
get rid of her/his spouse whenever s/he feels to do so multiple times; and people like this
know how to go around the civil law to reach their intended aim.

Advert
Advert