Suspended jail term for man who terrorised wife and children
A man who terrorised his wife with a knife and then smashed into her car in which her three children rode as passengers was yesterday given a suspended jail term after the woman forgave him.
The incident took place on April 24, 2005 when the couple got into an argument at the woman's house in Marsascala while the man was drunk. He got hold of a knife and threatened her. She was so scared she grabbed their two small children and her six-month-old baby and ran to her car. He gave chase in a Mini Minor and, still in Marsascala, rammed her car, hitting the passenger door on the side where the baby was sitting. Fortunately, there were no injuries.
The woman immediately filed a police report and shortly afterwards her estranged husband phoned to tell her he was at her house and was smashing everything up.
The woman went straight back home to find that he had broken a window. He started threatening to kill her or make her spend the rest of her life in a wheelchair.
She called the police again and he tried to ram her car a second time but was stopped by police officers who had, by then arrived at the scene.
In a police statement, the man admitted to threatening his estranged wife but refused to answer any other questions about the incident.
His wife testified that she forgave her estranged husband and that he radically changed when he drank too much. She added that she held nothing against him because he helped her a lot. He was also attending group therapy sessions.
Magistrate Jacqueline Padovani said that although the prosecution had produced a number of previous judgments regarding the man, there were no witnesses to prove that the judgments actually were about him and, therefore, he could not be found guilty of relapsing.
There would usually be a witness from the Court Registry present to confirm the identity of the accused but this time there was no one to do so.
The man was given a two-year jail term suspended for four years after the magistrate considered the circumstances of the case and, particularly, the fact that his wife had forgiven him. She also suspended the man's driving licence for a year and fined him €582.34.
Names are not being published to preserve the identity of the woman and the children.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
D Camilleri
Feb 10th 2011, 21:54
Why should it be treated as less of a crime just because his wife forgave him? Could it be that perhaps she is afraid of him ? A crime is a crime and forgiveness shouldn't come into it!
ACURMI
Jul 23rd 2010, 18:53
I agree with you D Vella. And I am sure that the wife has forgiven him just because she is afraid of him. I feel so sorry for this poor woman and especially for the children that God only knows what happens behind closed doors. I write from personal experience but thanks God I was saved as I found help and protection.
Leo Bartolo
Jul 23rd 2010, 15:09
Suspended jail sentence indeed. Shame. No wonder domestic violence is on the increase. Someone said 'the law is an ass' well he was wrong, he should have said, 'the law is crap'
Paul Barrett
Jul 23rd 2010, 12:47
It is unfortunate that this took five years to come to trial - it really is too long a gap for a fair and just and meaningful sentence to be awarded.
DVella
Jul 23rd 2010, 12:38
What nonsense ! ! ! ! Since when does the fact that a victim forgave an aggressor have any bearing on the severity of the crime committed?? Since when is a sentence for more than one serious crime mitigated on the strength of a statement of moral forgiveness?? Doesn't the Law actually have any bearing in these judgements???
The article clearly indicates that the accused had already allegedly threatened the victim once before, is it not possible that the victim's statement of forgiveness was made out of fear? What of the children?? Doesn't the law take any account of the fact that the accused's alleged actions put the lives of two young children in danger and caused them severe psychological trauma in the process . . . ? Surely I am not alone in considering that a suspended sentence is ridiculous in such a case!!!!
Please choose the reason of your report below: