Advert

PN demands apology from Anglu Farrugia on corrupt practices case

The PN has called on Labour leader Joseph Muscat and the PL to dissassociate themselves from comments made by deputy leader Anglu Farrugia.

Dr Farrugia had, while speaking in parliament, urged the Attorney General to appeal a court decision which found there was no corrupt practice in a case first raised by Dr Farrugia. In his comments, Dr Farrugia asked if the court had correctly interpreted the law, on the basis of the evidence that was given.

The party said that the comments made by Dr Farrugia showed disrespect to the rules of democracy and they were dangerous given that he was a party deputy leader who hoped to be a minister.

The PN said Dr Farrugia had first waged a campaign where he alleged electoral malpractices despite the people's vote, and then he had accused a person with electoral corrupt practices.

The allegations were refuted by the court, but instead of apologizing for having labelled a person, Dr Farrugia had criticised the courts.

The PN asked whether Dr Farrugia considered himself to be above the court and said he should apologise to the people.

Advert

39 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

A.Attard

Jul 19th 2010, 11:54

But I am sure the MLP Know what that word means,especialy when Alfred Sant had to resign :)

Allan Gatt

Jul 18th 2010, 14:48

Punt eccellenti.

Joseph Vella

Jul 18th 2010, 09:29

When I read your comments I really do believe that we still stand a chance of winning....however, re. Anglu Farrugia, I'm quite disappointed to be honest. These people's job is at stake, why should they confirm what really happened back in March 2008!

J Martinelli

Jul 17th 2010, 13:42

Anglu Farrugia made his comments in Parliament and made good use of his Parliamentary privilege in order to avoid direct libel action. Should he repeat the same comments outside the House, then he would be liable for libel and possibly contempt of Court.
The PN would be out of order to intervene in the administration of justice. This is 2010, not 1971-1987.
However Commissioner Rizzo should explain why the Police even bothered to proceed against an innocent person based on the (obvious) defective evidence brought forward by Dr. Anglu Farrugia.

Jesmond Abela

Jul 17th 2010, 13:25

ADDIO LABOUR PARTY!!!

George Mallia

Jul 17th 2010, 15:11

Hallina Antoine, u jekk trid tikkwota l-istorja mahmuga tal-elezzjonijiet kwota hollha u shiha. L-aghar hmieg li qatt sar fl-elezzjonijiet f'Malta sar fis-sittinijiet fi zmien iz-ziju Mike. Dan tkompla sa l-elezzjoni tal-1971. Fl-1981 veru kien hemm caqliq fid-distretti li ta' rebha mhux misthoqqa lil MLP - ghalkemm din kienet legali u skond il-kostituzzjoni. Dwar l-ahhar elezzjoni int ghandek xi dubbju li ma kien hawn korruzzjoni? Jien m'ghandiex.

Pierre P. Borg

Jul 17th 2010, 11:49

Beg to disagree. A member of parliament has every right to comment on a court decision. Or is this now acceptable only if it comes from a PN member?

Johann Grech

Jul 17th 2010, 12:51

It is a democratic right of anyone to criticise any sentence passed anywhere, anytime on anything. All parties have done that at several occasions and not exclusively on Maltese courts judgments.
What is simply unacceptable is a simpleton ‘s view of what constitutes democracy.

Advert
Advert