GRTU insists on compensation, ministry says claim is 'nonsensical'
The GRTU insisted again this evening that shop owners should be compensated for loss of business stemming from infrastructural works in Valletta which, it said, had been imposed without proper consultation and planning with the businesses concerned.
The chamber said it was in favour of embellishment, but it was critical of the manner how the works were being carried out since this was endangering the livelihood of the shop owners. Seriousness demanded that those who caused losses should compensate for those losses.
The chamber said the Valletta works should have been planned with the shop owners in a way that would have enabled the latter to plan, such as by scheduling the leave of their employees to coincide with the works.
However in this case there had been imposition and the GRTU had been reduced to pleading to be told about the works.
The GRTU said Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt, in a statement earlier today had mentioned a letter sent to his ministry by the GRTU's lawyer, but he had not mentioned the fact that it referred only to St John Street. Neither had he said that the shop owners there had had to complain through their lawyer that unless complaints about the street were remedied, they would take legal action.
The GRTU insisted that shopowners had to be compensated for their losses. It called on the government to hold talks how the situation could be remedied.
Earlier, the Infrastructure Ministry said that the notion that shop-owners in Valletta should be compensated for infrastructural works currently in hand was 'nonsensical'.
GRTU Director-General Vince Farrugia revealed the request for compensation yesterday.
The ministry said the GRTU was contradicting itself. While Vince Farrugia was demanding compensation, Dr Jan-Karl Farrugia in a letter sent to the ministry on behalf of the same GRTU said last week that: "we take the opportunity to thank you for the rapid progress and little inconvenience that the project has caused to the shop community".
The ministry said the paving of the pedestrian areas of Valletta and the upgrading of its entrance, were projects that had long been required by all, first and foremost by the shop owners represented by the GRTU. The current works represented an unprecedented standard of provision for pedestrian access, disruption minimisation and site management. But there was no construction project that was immune from any form of inconvenience.
"The GRTU, or at least its Director General, does not seem to be aware that before and throughout the implementation of the embellishment works, the GRTU and the shop owners were fully consulted and informed through meetings, direct mailings and advertising. Moreover, before the start of works on each phase (or street), at least one meeting was held on site with the GRTU, many times in the presence of the shop owners themselves," the ministry added.
It said that in some areas, such as South Street, the works were ahead of schedule. The shop owners themselves seemed to appreciate this, as the GRTU letter by Dr Jan Karl Farrugia of last week demonstrated.
As to the timing of the works, the ministry said the project actually started in February, which according to shop owners was a good month for works. It was paused for festivities important to shop owners and on their explicit request, such as Mothers' day and Easter. The work was being intensified in summer because of various practical reasons, including the recess of Parliament, the reduced workload of the law courts and other entities, the reduced operating hours of several establishments including commercial ones as well as the request by shop owners to have works completed well before Christmas.
Should works stop in Summer, they would have to go on into the Christmas period, which was a far more sensitive period for shop owners.
"The notion that shop-owners should be ‘compensated' because of works to upgrade the streets leading to their front door is nonsensical. The GRTU seems to suggest that no upgrading works should ever occur in case they cause inconvenience to shop owners. But, as their criticism before the works started so loudly claimed, the shopping business cannot thrive in a city which is allowed to degenerate and which is starved of the investment it needs to be upgraded," the ministry said.
"In place of the ‘compensation' the GRTU is claiming, the government is spending over €2 million in the current phase alone of upgrading the paving of the main shopping streets of Valletta. This apart from portions that have recently been completed (like Merchants Street and St John Square) that have proven a thriving success for the retail operators there, as well as the major projects at the entrance to the City."
See also
12 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
D Agius
Jul 15th 2010, 11:08
Mhux wiehed, mhux tnejn, Mhux tlieta....Din bla sens daqsha Cens. U barra minn hekk, QATT ma tista' tkun kredibbli inti ghax bhal ma qallek Charles Mangion darba, inti taghmel u titkellem skond kif jaqbillek.
mario camilleri
Jul 15th 2010, 09:14
Well done to infrastracture Minister Austin Gatt. A big thank you from the business community of St.John Street, for the the paving work being done. Again, a very big THANK YOU.
Joe Mangion
Jul 15th 2010, 08:53
The GRTU and its director should be ashamed. Are you really asking for compensation? Mela x'imisshom jaghmlu dawk in nies kollha li gew misruqin mill membri taghkom importaturi tal-medicini? Sur Vince Farrugia, mhux ahjar ma tlablabx aktar u tara kif se tirrifondaw lil dawk in nies kollha li xtraw bi prezz gholi il medicini tul dawn l-ahhar snin? Wara kollox intom stess ammettejtu li il prezzijiet tal medicini kienu gholjin.
Peter Korsten
Jul 15th 2010, 08:36
Now, on principle I'm against hand-outs and government support. However, works in this country take disproportionally long. A good example: Strait Street. It's just a simple, short street, and yet it's taken months and months, and are they ready yet? It's at a funny angle at one end, for sure.
But if the shop owners suffer from the works, and they can prove it's because the works take too long, they can sue the government for damages. And this would probably be the best cause of action, because it's impossible to predict how much they will suffer, and therefore it would be irresponsible to hand out taxpayers' money beforehand.
Raymond Cutajar
Jul 15th 2010, 03:05
What is wrong with you GRTU ? you completely Ignore the pleas of other members within thesame GRTU
invariably all VRT stations are members of the GRTU why you NEVER utter one single sentence in their defence ?
This sheer Silence qualifies for collusion in the most of subtleness subtle
Ghawn Spizerija ghat Twellija Censu ,tafx jekk hemmx limitu fil ligi kemm wiehed jista 'jkollu Spizeriji taht ismu ? Grazzi R.C
Claire Busuttil
Jul 15th 2010, 00:27
Compensation??? what ???? ministry is right....it is nonsense!
Paul Borg
Jul 14th 2010, 23:11
My Restaurant happens to be in front of the ministry of finance and economy in south street. I have been made to suffer 90% less business from the works, and after all the project will not involve our part of south street. In other words we feel the pain with no gain. In case nobody has seen the works, very little sections of streets are being paved, the rest is for the dogs.
A. Agius
Jul 14th 2010, 22:14
Naqbel perfettament mal-argument bis-sens tal-GRTU.
IL-gvern ghandu johrog kumpens ghat-telf li sofrew in-negozjanti li trangaw it-toroq ta quddiem biebhom.
Hekk kif jitlesta dan il-pavimentar gdid in-negozjanti jizdidilhom il-bejgh iktar minn qatt qabel ghax il-klijenti jiehdu gost isibu iktar kumdita u ndafa sabiex imorru jixtru f' dawn l-akkwati.
Nahseb illi l-GRTU tant tghoxa ghan-nom ta' dawn in-negozjanti illi tordnalhom jikkumpensaw lill Gvern ghaz-zieda fil-bejgh li jkunu qed igawdu.
Jekk le allura gib l' hawn biss eh?? (one way traffic)
Alfred Cassar
Jul 14th 2010, 21:34
Din bis-serjeta jew xi cajta !!!!
C. Farrugia
Jul 14th 2010, 18:17
The problem with the lack of business of the shops in Valletta is not parking but the economic situation coupled with the enormous expansion of shopping malls all over Malta. The customers of the recently opening shopping Mall in Tigne came from somewhere. Yes they partially came from the Valletta, Hamrun, Sliema shops. Something has to give. TOO MANY SHOPS
philip pace
Jul 15th 2010, 07:04
Very true!!!!
G. Camilleri
Jul 14th 2010, 17:54
Hallina ftit kwieti Cens, mela ma tafx x'qal siehbek Jan-Karl Farruigia. Ghax ma tirtirax Cens issa li ma mortx Brussels!!!!