Green groups prepare to fight John Dalli's GMO initiative
All eyes will be on John Dalli this week as he officially presents new proposals to facilitate the introduction of more genetically modified (GM) crops into the EU.
Shortly after assuming his role as European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy, Mr Dalli walked into a storm by lifting a 13-year ban on the cultivation of a GM potato, called Amflora, to be used for starch by industry. His decision was met with resistance by many member states and was harshly criticised by the anti-GM lobby, particularly environmental lobby groups.
This was just the beginning, according to various EU-wide NGOs who are promising a much harsher battle against Mr Dalli's new initiative.
According to unofficial versions of the proposal, the Commission will present a plan to overhaul existing regulations so that individual countries would be allowed to give socio-economic or cultural reasons for banning cultivation of GM crops.
Mr Dalli will be proposing that member states opposed to GM crops should be free to ban them from cultivation on non-scientific grounds. This offer will be made in the hope that such states, including Malta, will end their tactic of stalling the approval process for each submission to grow GM crops in the EU.
Under the proposal, the existing Europe-wide process for approving GM crops will carry on as it is, with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) having the final say on whether crops are harmless enough to human health and the environment to be safely grown anywhere in Europe.
Opponents of GM crops want to make sure Mr Dalli's proposals, which will have to be approved by member states, are stopped.
"Governments should study the fine print because Mr Dalli's proposal is not worth the paper it is written on," Jorgo Riss from the EU unit of Greenpeace told The Times.
"This is bald deceit aimed at satisfying the multi-billion industry behind GM technology. Governments that understand the risk of GM crops are being offered a deal too good to be true. In return for what looks like a legal right to ban GM crops at national and local level, they will be expected to drop any health and environmental concerns they have at EU level and authorise new crops without argument," Mr Riss said.
The concerns on Mr Dalli's latest proposals have also been voiced in Malta, before the official presentation scheduled for Wednesday.
Friends of the Earth (Malta) described his plan as an "empty and potentially dangerous deal" and called on the government to vote against this proposal when the time comes.
Despite this resistance, Mr Dalli is determined to soldier on. "We are doing what we promised to do," he said during a visit to the port of Antwerp.
Spain, the main producer of Monsanto's transgenic MON 810 maize in the EU, like France a pro-GM member state, also blasted what it sees as a re-nationalisation of authorisations.
However, Mr Dalli rejected that interpretation.
"I don't think this is a question of nationalisation. It's a question of different circumstances in different countries, of size or of specific landscapes," he said.
"It will be for the states to decide whether or not to authorise the planting of GMOs on their territory once an authorisation decision has been taken at European level.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
P Agius
Jul 12th 2010, 21:20
MR Dalli, Can you please stop in controlling what I EAT.....I guess it's my right to KNOW that I'm eating healthy food
l fenech
Jul 12th 2010, 13:17
Prosit Dalli ghal-l-ewwel hoss li ghamilt.
Joe Borg
Jul 12th 2010, 12:48
Are those who approve GMOs in the GMO companies pockets? That is what is being asked worldwide.
John Portelli - MOAM
Jul 12th 2010, 11:54
The GM lobby has been pushing for year trying to break into the European market. Finally they have managed to find the right person to do it for them.
Unfortunately John Dalli is taking the Balance Sheet approach of reasoning and as a professional accountant has figured out that by allowing GM seeds, and eventually other live organisms, there are a couple of companies that will be making a lot of money, I mean lots and lots of money.
This approach does not take into consideration the farmer's welfare, ecological damage, and treat to biodiversity.
GM seeds will push aside all the genetics that farmers have selected over the years. Farmers will be forced to use herbicides and other chemicals from the seed producers and has to pay year-in-year-out the GM seed company for new seeds every year as they will lose the right to keeping their own seeds.
It is a pity that Dalli has chosen the year dedicated to protecting Biodiversity!!
Please Mr. Dalli, don't force the agriculture sector into slavery.
Antoine Borg
Jul 13th 2010, 08:02
Mr Portelli, you seem to have misinterpreted things.
The GM lobby has already broken into the European market - all the meat you eat right now comes from animals fed on GM-grown feed.
You also suggest that allowing "GM seeds, and eventually other live organisms", GM companies will be making money. Firstly, GM seeds are not live organisms. Secondly, yes, European companies will be making money. That is a good thing, isn't it?
GM food does take the farmer's welfare into consideration - Have you seen the reports on incidence of cancers in farmers after having used GM crops? The incidence of cancer _goes down_ if you have fields of GM crops because of the decreased need of pesticides.
Check your facts before writing again.
Charles Grixti
Jul 14th 2010, 14:21
@Antoine Borg
So making money is a good thing no matter what. Remember it is the love of money that is the root of all evil.
The main company that is behind the GMO seeds is Monsanto and it is American, although it may have European subsidiaries hiding under different names to satisfy European laws and fool the gullible.
And taking your argument to its logical conclusion, if making money is the end goal of all things, then the Organized Crime, Slavery, Piracy and Theft and Murder should also be allowed.
And yes, of course GMO are alive – all seeds are alive otherwise they would not germinate. The only difference is the GMO seeds have in them genetic materials from other organisms and cross the animal/vegetable barrier. These Frankenstein’s are different from anything yet seen in nature. Would you be happy if you and your childlren are eating tasteless tomatoes that have the genes from a pig or a rat or even human in them and whose effects on human health is not yet known?
I think that you seriously need to rethink this one, using a higher standard of moral and ethical values.
J. Borg
Jul 12th 2010, 10:52
it seems Mr. Dalli and his team do not have anything better (or in this case WORSE) to do.....
Mario Tabone-Vassallo
Jul 12th 2010, 10:44
Ma ghandniex bzonn OGM. Ma jidhrux li taffew xi problemi fit-tul, fil-fatt holqu problemi ta' uzu iktar ta' erbicidi, minghajr ma ziedu d-daqs ta' l-ghelejjel. Barra minn dan, inkunu qed injassru l-agrikoltura kollha f'idejn tlitt kumpaniji intenazzjonali. Problema ohra hi li ma jaghmilx sens nitmashnu ghax jidhlu annimali u pjanti godda f'ambjenti fejn ma kienux, waqt li fl-istess hin ahna stess indahhlu dawn l-OGM b'karatteristici li jistghu jaqbzu minn speci ghall-ohra b'konsegwenzi li hadd ma jaf x'ikunu.