Advert

Green groups prepare to fight John Dalli's GMO initiative

All eyes will be on John Dalli this week as he officially presents new proposals to facilitate the introduction of more genetically modified (GM) crops into the EU.

Shortly after assuming his role as European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy, Mr Dalli walked into a storm by lifting a 13-year ban on the cultivation of a GM potato, called Amflora, to be used for starch by industry. His decision was met with resistance by many member states and was harshly criticised by the anti-GM lobby, particularly environmental lobby groups.

This was just the beginning, according to various EU-wide NGOs who are promising a much harsher battle against Mr Dalli's new initiative.

According to unofficial versions of the proposal, the Commission will present a plan to overhaul existing regulations so that individual countries would be allowed to give socio-economic or cultural reasons for banning cultivation of GM crops.

Mr Dalli will be proposing that member states opposed to GM crops should be free to ban them from cultivation on non-scientific grounds. This offer will be made in the hope that such states, including Malta, will end their tactic of stalling the approval process for each submission to grow GM crops in the EU.

Under the proposal, the existing Europe-wide process for approving GM crops will carry on as it is, with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) having the final say on whether crops are harmless enough to human health and the environment to be safely grown anywhere in Europe.

Opponents of GM crops want to make sure Mr Dalli's proposals, which will have to be approved by member states, are stopped.

"Governments should study the fine print because Mr Dalli's proposal is not worth the paper it is written on," Jorgo Riss from the EU unit of Greenpeace told The Times.

"This is bald deceit aimed at satisfying the multi-billion industry behind GM technology. Governments that understand the risk of GM crops are being offered a deal too good to be true. In return for what looks like a legal right to ban GM crops at national and local level, they will be expected to drop any health and environmental concerns they have at EU level and authorise new crops without argument," Mr Riss said.

The concerns on Mr Dalli's latest proposals have also been voiced in Malta, before the official presentation scheduled for Wednesday.

Friends of the Earth (Malta) described his plan as an "empty and potentially dangerous deal" and called on the government to vote against this proposal when the time comes.

Despite this resistance, Mr Dalli is determined to soldier on. "We are doing what we promised to do," he said during a visit to the port of Antwerp.

Spain, the main producer of Monsanto's transgenic MON 810 maize in the EU, like France a pro-GM member state, also blasted what it sees as a re-nationalisation of authorisations.

However, Mr Dalli rejected that interpretation.

"I don't think this is a question of nationalisation. It's a question of different circumstances in different countries, of size or of specific landscapes," he said.

"It will be for the states to decide whether or not to authorise the planting of GMOs on their territory once an authorisation decision has been taken at European level.

Advert

8 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Antoine Borg

Jul 13th 2010, 08:02

Mr Portelli, you seem to have misinterpreted things.

The GM lobby has already broken into the European market - all the meat you eat right now comes from animals fed on GM-grown feed.

You also suggest that allowing "GM seeds, and eventually other live organisms", GM companies will be making money. Firstly, GM seeds are not live organisms. Secondly, yes, European companies will be making money. That is a good thing, isn't it?

GM food does take the farmer's welfare into consideration - Have you seen the reports on incidence of cancers in farmers after having used GM crops? The incidence of cancer _goes down_ if you have fields of GM crops because of the decreased need of pesticides.

Check your facts before writing again.

Charles Grixti

Jul 14th 2010, 14:21

@Antoine Borg

So making money is a good thing no matter what. Remember it is the love of money that is the root of all evil.

The main company that is behind the GMO seeds is Monsanto and it is American, although it may have European subsidiaries hiding under different names to satisfy European laws and fool the gullible.

And taking your argument to its logical conclusion, if making money is the end goal of all things, then the Organized Crime, Slavery, Piracy and Theft and Murder should also be allowed.

And yes, of course GMO are alive – all seeds are alive otherwise they would not germinate. The only difference is the GMO seeds have in them genetic materials from other organisms and cross the animal/vegetable barrier. These Frankenstein’s are different from anything yet seen in nature. Would you be happy if you and your childlren are eating tasteless tomatoes that have the genes from a pig or a rat or even human in them and whose effects on human health is not yet known?

I think that you seriously need to rethink this one, using a higher standard of moral and ethical values.

Advert
Advert