Iran appears to back down on woman's stoning
Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani. Photo: Amnesty International
Iran yesterday appeared to have backed down over the stoning of a woman for adultery amid an international outcry, although her lawyer said she remained in jail and could still be executed by other means.
The Iranian embassy in London said in a statement reported by The Times that Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani would no longer be stoned to death, a practice condemned by Western governments as "mediaeval" and tantamount to torture.
The embassy said that "according to information from the relevant judicial authorities in Iran, (Mohammadi-Ashtiani) will not be executed by stoning".
Her lawyer in Iran, however, said he had yet to receive any confirmation of the news, and bemoaned the vagueness of the statement which did not say whether she might be killed by other means.
"I have yet to be told of any stay in implementation of the sentence," Mohammad Mostafavi said by telephone. "My client remains in prison."
The embassy did not elaborate on whether her conviction had been quashed or the sentence had been commuted to an alternative form of capital punishment - in Iran normally hanging from a crane inside prison walls.
"It didn't say the verdict had been overturned, so is she going to face some alternative punishment, is she going to be released or will there be a retrial?" Mr Mostafavi said.
Mohammadi-Ashtiani, 43, was convicted in 2006 of having an "illicit relationship" with two men and received 99 lashes, before being convicted of adultery and sentenced to death, according to Amnesty International.
The rights group warned on July 1 that the mother-of-two's execution may be "imminent" and in the past week, the European Union, Britain, France and the US have urged the Iranian authorities to stay the execution.
An open letter condemning the execution has also been signed by figures such as former US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice, three ex-British foreign ministers, Nobel peace laureate José Ramos-Horta and actor Robert De Niro.
Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Am-nesty International's Middle East and North Africa deputy director, urged Iran to spare Mohammadi-Ashtiani's life, saying a "mere change" in the method of execution was not enough.
"To punish - and in some cases execute - people for being in consenting relationships is no business of the state," the Amnesty official said. The rights group said it was aware of at least 10 other people - including seven women - under sentence of stoning.
1 Comment
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Xuereb
Jul 31st 2010, 17:13
Summary executions in Iran and other religion-obsessed societies are commonplace. Even accepting that adultery is a betrayal of trust. does it warrant a death sentence? Be that as it may, such harsh sentences are of course meant to act as a deterrent (cutting off of thieves' hands and so on). The objective being to keep the 'society' clean and god-fearing*. It concerns me that Malta and many Maltese would wish this state of affairs. Insisting that anything is better than divorce means, in effect, that a suffering woman at the hands of her husband for a lifetime's duration is tolerable. In which case, stoning to death may be a better alternative. At least it is over in a few minutes. I can imagine many Maltasa say, 'haqqha, min qaliiha tibdel ir-ragel' (serves her right for betraying her husband)
As Islam spreads (as seems the intention) the planet under Shariah law generally applied would not be a happy place, for women especially.
* Case of two male teenagers hanged a couple of years ago on a trumped-up charge of homosexuality - so what if it wasn't trumped-up? - and then telling the world homosexuality in Iran is unknown.