Police seize driving licences
'Fraudulent benefit'
A number of driving licences have been seized by the police following investigations into Transport Malta's licensing department, which led to three employees being suspended last month.
According to the authority, which for years has been haunted by accusations of irregularities, progress was made on "all matters" raised in a report by a private audit firm and a letter from Transport Minister Austin Gatt. Dr Gatt had sent a strongly-worded letter with instructions to chairman Mark Portelli following the audit report which he found "deeply" concerning.
One of his orders was to employ a person by the end of June with experience in banking procedures and checks and balances to introduce the necessary procedures and monitor implementation.
A ministry spokesman yesterday replied to questions sent a week ago by The Times, saying the person had been employed but adding that no other details could be divulged.
Asked whether anyone had been called to resit the driving test, the spokesman said: "We are informed the police have indeed seized a number of licences and are currently investigating others we have found to be questionable. No one can drive without a licence and to obtain a new licence, one must sit for the appropriate tests."
The investigation was prompted by allegations made by Labour MP Joe Mizzi, which led to a police investigation.
Transport Malta did not say how many licences were seized.
The report by audit firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers, which was passed on to the police, had found some people "fraudulently benefitted" from the addition of a new licence category without having sat the appropriate test.
The auditors tested 127 cases reported since 2001 and found that, while in 42 cases people had sat for the driving exam, 85 cases "remained questionable". A sample used to test pre-2001 licence holders found 75 per cent of cases to be "suspect". Transport Malta said it would have to verify all pre-2001 extensions, case by case, and ask all identified drivers to either prove their eligibility or else sit for the relevant exam.
The auditors found that 12.5 per cent of licences between 2007 and 2009 are suspected to have been issued "free of charge".
An investigation into misappropriation through cancellation of receipts found another 12.5 per cent of cases "suspect".
In 2006, the transport regulator was hit by a scandal that saw two driving instructors being convicted of bribery. Two authority officials were convicted of taking bribes the following year.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
R.Borg
Jul 10th 2010, 09:57
THANK YOU
DR. GATT
THANK YOU
MR.MIZZI
THANK YOU
MALTA POLICE FORCE
THANK YOU
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
THANK YOU
HONEST MEMBERS OF MTA
KEEP ON EXPOSING AND SHAMING THE CORRUPT
QUO VADIS, MELITAE
DEAR MALTA, YOU ARE DISTANCING YOURSELF FROM GOD AND HIS COMMANDMENTS
YOU ARE PUTTING ASIDE ETHICAL VALUES.
Jillian Borg Rawson
Jul 9th 2010, 17:57
Its true what i read, but i still think that the locals over the age of 50 should retake their driving test as most just cannot drive, they can start a motor yes but using it wisely on the roads and show courtecy is a different matter, i believe some Gozitans don't even know what a indicator is for, i heared they only use it during the Xmas/periodit goes with the xmas tree, nice lights, after all its good manners to let us know what their intention is before they decide to maneuver the car to either left or right its so simple....its just sheer ill- mannered. J.B.Rawson (another moaning Brit).
Ganni Ellul
Jul 10th 2010, 09:03
Dear Mr Rawson, I am over 50 , have driven both here in Europe and UK and never had an accident, except for one time when my brakes failed due to driving through a flooded street in Berkshire and bumping into a parked car.Never been stopped by police in any country except in Cyprus, (I was driving a friend's car and the officer recognised the car and he got the impression that I stole it.) Should I take the test?
One thing I am nopticing in this article is that these were not new licences but a driving category additions, am I right in assuming that the addition was for the category for public transport class?ie: licence to drive passengers vehicles . If so can the ADT take full responsability for any injuries or fatalities happening due to accidents involving vehicles driven by these fraudsters?