Major parties ignore AD's protest on electoral reform
Alternattiva Demokratika is evaluating all legal avenues to contest what it claims is a discriminatory electoral system after the judicial protest it filed 10 days ago was ignored by the major parties, according to leader Michael Briguglio.
“The two major parties have shown they are not interested in having a truly representative democracy but the story will not end here,” Mr Briguglio said.
The judicial protest was filed against the Prime Minister, the Opposition Leader, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Attorney General, claiming the electoral law gave no chance to small parties to elect a candidate and was, therefore, discriminatory.
The protest remained unanswered when the statutory 10day period in which a reply could be submitted expired yesterday.
AD said the Nationalist Party was awarded extra parliamentary seats in the last general election to secure its slim majority while no seats were awarded to the Green Party, which polled 3,800 votes, more than double the difference in votes between the major parties.
“It is premature to say when we will take our next step but there are various avenues, such as the Constitutional Court and EU institutions,” Mr Briguglio said, insisting AD did not want a situation where the major parties made last-minute piecemeal changes to the electoral system.
He criticised the stand taken by both parties reserving harsher words for the Labour Party, which completely brushed off the issue, insisting it was not a priority.
“(Prime Minister) Lawrence Gonzi said our argument made no sense but the almost 4,000 voters who chose AD were discriminated against because they were denied representation while the PN’s majority of 1,500 was rewarded by additional seats,” Mr Briguglio said.
He described Labour’s attitude as a “throwback to the 1980s because it only viewed the electoral system as a technical exercise and not as a democratic tool”.
Labour had said electoral reform was not a priority as much as the validation of ID cards to make sure that only people eligible to vote did so at election time.
Mr Briguglio hit out at what he described as Labour “infantile” attitude when it pulled out of the parliamentary select committee discussing important issues, such as electoral reform and political party financing.
Mr Briguglio reiterated AD’s stand in favour of a mixed electoral system like Germany’s where candidates could get elected either from districts, as was the case today, or made it to Parliament if their party secured a national threshold of 2.5 per cent.
“Electoral reform is a top priority for the Green party’s executive and we will not let the issue fade away,” Mr Briguglio insisted.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Dennis Zammit
Jul 6th 2010, 23:05
Why all this fuss from AD? Who do they represent in this country? 1.?% so?
David Caruana
Jul 6th 2010, 15:42
PN + PL : Cosa Nostra style politics
J. Borg
Jul 6th 2010, 14:48
Typical PNPL duopoly
secret party financing
AD should set as it top priority the (democratic) reform of the electoral law
Then finally voters may have the opportunity to vote FOR someone rather than AGAINST!
David Caruana
Jul 6th 2010, 12:08
"The political rise of the (German) Greens was made possible by the German system of proportional representation in the German Bundestag (Parliament). Any party scoring over 5% of the national vote is represented by members in the Bundestag.
In turn, the election of Green members of the Bundestag altered the political landscape, putting pressure on “ordinary” politicians to adopt “green” positions, or possibly lose votes the next election cycle to Green Party candidates.
So the stage was set for environmentally aware people to influence the German national agenda in many ways."
On this same newspaper in just these last 2 days:
"Malta opts for heavy fuel oil as EU steers away from it" [1]
"NGOs 'not impressed by excuses' on air quality"[2]
Why wouldn't PN and PL want to discuss electoral reform and political party FINANCING?
If they've got nothing to hide, why wouldn't they agree to publish where their parties are getting the donations from?
Shall we think it's dirty money then?
Shall we think that these "donators" are getting special favours in return?
Wake up people of Malta!
[1] http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100706/local/malta-opts-for-heavy-fuel-oil-as-eu-steers-away-from-it
[2] http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100705/local/ngos-not-impressed-by-excuses-on-air-quality