Advert

Vatican official in 'sad and open' meetings

Two other men emerge with abuse claims

A top Vatican official described his meetings with the alleged victims of sexual abuse as "very sad, moving and open", as two more men came forward with similar claims about priests who ran an orphanage.

"I'm here primarily to honour their request, to meet them and listen to them. But I wanted to use this occasion to get direct information about the case," Mgr Charles Scicluna told The Sunday Times yesterday after concluding meetings with six of the 13 alleged victims.

The men claim they were abused some 20 years ago at St Joseph's orphanage in St Venera.

Mgr Scicluna, Promoter of Justice in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, is expected to remain in Malta until July 2 to gather information from the alleged victims against four priests who served at the institute.

When asked about a promise made to one of the accusers that action would be taken by August, Mgr Scicluna acknowledged there was a sense of urgency but said the timeframe depended on the Curia's Response Team as well as the amount of cooperation from the victims.

The Rome-based monsignor is meeting the men together with a notary, who is taking detailed statements.

His meticulous and warm approach was welcomed by the alleged victims, one of whom described his one-on-one meetings with him as "amazing".

Mgr Scicluna is the prosecuting officer in the case, but his work will rely heavily on the investigations of the Malta Curia's Response Team.

Decisions will then be taken on a local level by Archbishop Paul Cremona, together with the Vatican.

Mgr Scicluna confirmed that the toughest penalty is that of "reducing the priests to their lay state", which means defrocking them.

He said, however, he had no intention of meeting the accused priests, including one who was serving in Italy. That was the responsibility of the Response Team.

He stressed that he was in Malta to supplement the work by the Curia's Response Team, not override it.

"I am urging the men to cooperate fully with the Curia's investigation. We are working hand in hand and pulling the same rope."

The meetings will continue throughout this week.

"I might not manage to meet every one of them, but I will make sure that I know all the principal facts," he said.

The alleged victims had severely criticised the Church and police for failing to act at once against the priests in question, and have also pointed fingers at the courts for delaying proceedings. They first made their claims in 2003.

Meanwhile, two other men have emerged to make similar abuse claims about a priest at the same institute.

One of them, Joseph Mangion, told The Sunday Times he was regularly fondled by a priest by his bedside first thing in the morning when he was 16 and 17 years old.

Mr Mangion recounted his claims to Mgr Scicluna during a private meeting on Friday.

Asked why he chose to remain silent for so many years, Mr Mangion, now 37, said: "I only managed to pluck up the courage recently; especially after I saw some of my former friends speak up. I also consulted my family.

"For years I didn't know who I could speak to; I thought I shouldn't speak about it... I was scared of the priest in question, especially after I once saw him beat up my brother," Mr Mangion said.

He also blames the alleged abuse for his going off the rails for a period of time. He served a two-year and eight-month prison sentence for theft in 2001.

"I'm doing this now to help myself, to bring some closure and perhaps to help others who have chosen to stay quiet, to come out and speak.

I have nothing against priests. I still go to Mass, but it's about time I let this out," he said.

Advert

22 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Trevor Lorenzo Mizzi

Jun 27th 2010, 22:13

Dream on Joe Zammit.
What are you going to do when the first conviction happens?

William P Flynn

Jun 27th 2010, 14:39

Oh! So is that why the pope and the bishop wept after all. It was the money?

You're drowning Joe; and there's not even a straw to be seen anywhere. It's over.

Joe Zammit

Jun 27th 2010, 21:30


William, you are still green to understand the law, let alone change it!

Joseph Calleja

Jun 27th 2010, 15:09

Are you? Mr Zammit stop protecting these pedophile priests and admit that there are some bad apples out there. Please stop trying to degrade these innocent kids or men for that matter. These kids/men have been through a lot and have been quiet for the longest time. Mr Zammit what if these kids happen to be right? Are you ready to apologize to them? You seem to be the judge and jury. Get out of that balloon you live in and listen to what these kids/men are saying.

edward bartolo

Jun 27th 2010, 18:41

For many people oaths don't have any value. The best deterrent is to fine liars very heavy.

k.pace

Jun 27th 2010, 19:57

Let's put another way....
Are the priests denying under oath?

Joe Zammit

Jun 27th 2010, 21:48


K.Pace, yes, they are witnessing under oath at our law courts.

Ian Chetcuti

Jun 27th 2010, 13:36

Say Whaaaaaaat?

William P Flynn

Jun 27th 2010, 15:15

And there was the Vicar of Dibley who was a woman. And she was very funny and in the end she married this bloke. And she flew to heaven in the final episode which is on Youtube. And it was good. Amen I say to thee. Watch it, very funny.

Jesus had a father-in-law? Renald mate, if you see people walking around with firewood, and they ask for a light, run!

Joseph Micallef

Jun 27th 2010, 10:45

Who knows - maybe one/some of the perpetrators is a public figure or someone with a "holy" public image - and they are finding it difficult to take action against him/them. I would not be surprised. It does smell of a cover-up!

Carmelo Aquilina

Jun 27th 2010, 12:46

I agree - why isn't the state investigating these crimes ? This feels like a PR exercise for the church which is doing it's best in the words of its own documents "not to give scandal to the faithful" never mind sheltering criminals, and denying victims justice and compensation... shame ! Why is Mg Scicluna dragged down from Rome instead of the local Church giving victims what they are asking for ? The spinelessness of he Government and its deference to the Church cover up is equally scandalous.

Joe Zammit

Jun 27th 2010, 21:46


The Catholic Church, thank God, is doing her duty according to the Law of the Church. No one is going to dictate to the Church what to do. We have then our criminal law. According to our law ONLY the victims can lodge a complaint to the police. If they do nothing, the police cannot take an action. I would like to point out as well that any false report to the police is a criminal offence penalized by imprisonment.

Advert
Advert