No confirmation yet of tuna catch legality
The secretariat of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas is not yet in a position to say whether the 800 tuna released from a Maltese-owned pen by conservation activists was legal or not.
Asked about the legal status of the catch in question, the ICCAT secretariat said "all the information available in relation to these catches and fishing operations, when complete, will be submitted to the ICCAT commission".
The release of the tuna occurred last Thursday when activists from the conservation group Sea Shepherd rammed a tuna pen belonging to the Maltese company Fish and Fish. Photos taken by Sea Shepherd appear to show one of its divers ripping the net. The pen was being towed back to Malta after catches made by Libyan purse seiners.
The Maltese government has repeatedly said the catches were legal and that it would not tolerate attacks on Maltese fishermen doing "legal work".
However, Sea Shepherd captain Paul Watson has defended the action claiming the bluefin tuna were illegally caught out of season, they were juveniles and that an ICCAT inspector was not aboard when the catch was made.
Contacted by The Times yesterday, a Libyan fisheries official insisted all Libyan catches were legal and that all purse seiners were back in the harbour on June 15 at 1 a.m., with ICCAT inspectors on board.
This information could not be confirmed by ICCAT at the time of writing.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Resources and Rural Affairs yesterday defended the government's stand saying the catches were made by authorised Libyan purse seiners registered on the ICCAT website. Regional observers were present aboard each purse seiner during the fishing activity and they "did not report any irregularities".
Asked whether the ministry had seen the relevant documents showing that the catches were above board, the ministry said: "As per current ICCAT recommendations and EU regulations, the documents have to be on board the vessel transporting the fish, so that in case inspections are carried out at sea, the necessary documents can be checked."
The ministry stressed that the ICCAT verification processes were "rigorous" and that the report on this particular catch "was sent to Libya for the necessary cross-checks to be carried out".
Sources within the ministry said the process of legal verification was present at three stages: at the time of the catch, when the fish is transferred to be transported and when it is caged. In the case of the pen involved in the Sea Shepherd incident, the final stage will not take place because there are no fish to cage.
This year's bluefin tuna season was open between June 1 and June 15 but the EU stopped the fishing season halfway, on June 9, saying the EU member states had already reached their respective quotas.
Atlantic bluefin tuna has been on the decline. A report by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species stated that "the absolute extent of decline over the 50-year historical period ranging from 1957 to 2007 is estimated at 74.2 per cent, the bulk of which (60.9 per cent) was in the last 10 years".
The same report had recommended that Atlantic bluefin tuna be listed as an endangered species, meaning it could not be traded or caught. This proposed ban was however defeated.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Henry Fenech Azzopardi
Jun 23rd 2010, 11:37
The Government should thank the Sea Shepherd Society for providing photographic proof of the illegal acts committed by this outlawed organisation.
As already mentioned in my blogs yesterday the law of the seas make it ample clear that anything under tow should under no circumstances be approached except for humanitarian assistance.
The Government is expected to take all necessary legal steps to bring to justice all those involved in this issue. Solidariety in the papers by the ministry is not enough to justify the barbaric action by the Sea Shepherd.
I do not want to involve myself in the dipute of the tuna catch itself. I limit myself to the illegal approach by the Sea Shepherd. This organisation should be heavily penalised to avoid future similar interventions and make it known that there are legal channels to be applied.
Finally I confirm to the satisfaction of Chris Finch that I am all out in support of legal activity whether it is birds or fish and condemn all that is illegal. I limit myself to the rights given to me as a Maltese Citizen and contribute to the observation of the law.
Clint J. Zammit
Jun 23rd 2010, 10:58
The captain of the sea shepherd often features in a TV series called whale wars. It is often very harshly criticised. Apparently this man is not much liked even in America: http://malta-exposed.blogspot.com/2010/06/whale-whore.html
Captain Paul Watson
Jun 24th 2010, 02:54
Sorry to disappoint you Clint but Whale Wars is the highest watched show on Animal Planet and is extremely popular. Sea Shepherd is not a protest group, we are an anti-poaching group and the tuna we released were caught illegally. Actually we are hoping for a court case to give us the opportunity to present our documentation on past illegal activities of Fish and Fish.
Stephanie Roades
Jun 24th 2010, 15:20
Henry, I have some questions for you. What happens when all legal channels have been applied, and yet nothing changes? When entire species are being wiped out, but politicians will only respond to dollar signs? What do we do then? . And even though people are still allowed to slaughter these endangered animals, it's still not enough--there are still poachers to take what doesn't belong to them in an illegal manner. So I applaud the Sea Shepherds who seem to be the only ones who will not tolerate these illegal activities when the rest of the world wants to just turn their heads. They are, after all, only approaching ships that are operating outside of the legal deadline and quotas. And Clint, Whale Wars is hugely popular in the US. I wouldn't make any assumptions of American public opinion based on a South Park episode.