Front Against Censorship requests meetings with leaders
The Front Against Censorship is appealing to the Prime Minister and other political leaders to have direct talks with it so it can explain the censorship reforms it is demanding.
It also wishes to clarify whether the respective parties are willing to implement these changes in the first place.
The Front presented proposals to the MPs yesterday evening as they entered Parliament. It wants abolish or change outdated laws, acts and boards which it thinks are standing in the way of freedom of expression.
It said the fact censorship prevailed in 21st century Malta was "highly unacceptable and offensive" by EU standards and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Consequently, it wanted "eradication of the censorship regime" in a bid to abide by one core European value - freedom of expression.
Among the proposals, the Front would like to see the Classification Board for theatre performances and film abolished and a set of criteria established for self-classification, which would be updated periodically.
It also wants to decriminalise the possession, distribution and production of pornography, as long it does not in any way involve exploitation of children or adults.
Other proposals included removing articles from Malta's Criminal Code, such as Article 163, which dates back to 1933 and says individuals cannot vilify the Roman Catholic religion or those who preach it in any way.
Last year saw numerous instances of censorship, such as individuals prosecuted for dressing up in church vestments at Gozo's Nadur carnival and a ban on the theatrical play Stitching, by Scottish author Anthony Nielsen.
Arguably the most notorious example was student editor Mark Camilleri and author Alex Vella Gera being arraigned in court over the story Li Tkisser Sewwi, which was published in student newspaper Ir-Realta'. The story is a fictional first person account of a rampantly sexual man and his objectification of women.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jason G. Micallef
Jun 23rd 2010, 02:16
Censorship is not acceptable.
Today we censor on pornography.
Tomorrow we censor on political opinions.
The day after tomorrow people will be inprisioned because they do not agree with the country's elite.
Statistics prove that pornography does not lead to more sexual related crimes. Countries where pornography is legal do not have more cases of rape (pro rata) than countries where pornography is illegal.
Another point: If you have a problem with naked people, you have a problem with God! Because God didn't give us clothes when he made us!
Go and multiply.
So maybe parts of the bible should be censored..... THINK ABOUT IT !!!
Raymond Bezzina
Jun 23rd 2010, 07:59
Dear Mr. Micallef,
If I remember well, the word 'pornography' comes from a Greek word
which in english means ' the devil's pictures'.
Pornography is immoral and it is evil, therefore it should never
be legalized.
Raymond Bezzina
Jun 22nd 2010, 17:01
Where pornography circulates, criminality escalates.
Where pornography resides, human respect subsides.
Where pornography abodes, hatred abounds.
Pornography is immoral; it is evil, therefore it should never be legalized.
Joe Zammit
Jun 22nd 2010, 11:19
In its very essence pornography exploits its viewers, young and adults. It makes them its addicts.
Censorship is healthy, progressive and beneficial. The whole of our criminal law is ALL censorship!
MPs, fight pornography with all your might!