Two Maltese divers airlifted to hospital
Conflicting versions of events at sea
Two injured Maltese divers walking off the helipad to a waiting ambulance at Mater Dei Hospital, late last night. Photo Matthew Mirabelli.
A Maltese diver had his arm ripped by a fishing hook during a clash with conservationists who were trying to free caged tuna being towed by two fishing vessels.
The clash happened yesterday afternoon 35 nautical miles north of Tripoli when members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society accosted the two vessels - a tug boat and a supply vessel - towing the cage with hundreds of tuna belonging to Maltese company Fish and Fish.
The injured diver, Reuben Silvio, who was on board the Maltese-registered tug Rosaria Tuna, was airlifted to Malta late last night. A second diver who suffered bruising during the attack was also airlifted.
Both divers, one of whom had a bandaged hand, walked off the helipad at Mater Dei to a waiting ambulance at around midnight where members of their family, company officials and Fisheries Minister George Pullicino were waiting.
They were airlifted from the Italian-registered supply vessel Cesare Rustico at around 10.30 p.m. some 90 nautical miles away from Malta.
Sources said the Libyan coastguard, which was supposed to have attended to the emergency call, never turned up and this forced the vessel to leave the tuna pen and head towards Malta.
The fishing company and conservationists gave contrasting versions of what happened during the incident on the high seas.
Fish and Fish director Joe Caruana said the crew were shocked by the attack on their boats. He insisted the tuna was caught legally and Sea Shepherd had no right to inspect their vessels.
"They first used dinghies to attack our boats with ammonia and rubber bullets and then their ship rammed into the cage. They threw hooks into the sea in an attempt to rip the nets and it was at this point that Mr Silvio was injured when he tried to remove one of the hooks," a visibly shaken Mr Caruana said.
A couple of weeks ago, he added, company officials had a meeting with the Police Commissioner and warned that things might come to a head given that Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd had announced beforehand what their intentions were.
Mr Caruana confirmed that some of the tuna escaped after the cage was damaged.
Company lawyer John Refalo said the crew defended their property.
"What the Sea Shepherds did was disgusting. It is terrorism at sea, an act of piracy," Dr Refalo said, insisting the fish was caught legally according to the allocated quota.
He also accused the conservationists of using tear gas and rubber bullets on the unarmed fishermen.
"They had no right to inspect the cage and it is ridiculous for them to claim self defence because they were the ones to invade private property," Dr Refalo said, insisting the company would be taking legal action against the conservation organisation.
The captain of the conservation group's flagship Steve Irwin, which was involved in the incident, denied the accusations, insisting it was the ship's crew that repelled a "violent assault" by fishermen.
Speaking to The Times from on board the Steve Irwin, Captain Paul Watson said they had no evidence of anybody being injured.
"We had a helicopter in the air, we had inflatable dinghies in the water and we were filming the whole operation. From media reports we understood (the diver) was injured by a grapnel but we do not have evidence of that at all," he said.
He also denied using rubber bullets or tear gas, insisting that the ship's crew threw rotten butter on the deck of a fishing boat that tried to ram them. "We have it on video that the fishermen were attacking us with hooks after ramming us. We threw bottles of rotten butter on their deck and that sent them away," Capt. Watson said.
He said the conservation group was not a protest organisation like Greenpeace but one that took direct action to stop illegal activities.
"We had every reason to suspect that the tuna was caught illegally in the last couple of days when the fishing season is closed. We asked to inspect the cage but the fishermen were defensive and did not cooperate when we asked for information," he said, insisting the two fishing boats were purseiners - a claim flatly denied by Mr Caruana last night.
Capt. Watson claimed the organisation had investigated dozens of cages in the Mediterranean without incident and had also cooperated with the "Maltese coastguard" on a number of occasions.
"We did not bother legal operations but this was the first one we came across, which we felt quite confident had caught the fish in the closed season," he said.
"I sailed the Steve Irwin next to the cage to take a closer look and that is when the Rosaria Tuna rammed us in the stern and fishermen were attacking our members with fish hooks."
Capt. Watson said divers from the Steve Irwin managed to rip up the net and release several hundred tuna, which were also caught on film.
Sea Shepherd is an international non-profit, marine wildlife conservation organisation and is conducting a campaign against tuna fishing in the Mediterranean.
Minister Pullicino condemned the attack describing it as "unacceptable aggression". He said the Maltese tuna operation was legal and within EU parameters, adding that people had every right to express their views and make their point but within a legal framework.
It is unfortunate, he said, that this incident led to the injury of two Maltese workers.
The government also expressed solidarity with the injured fisherman and condemned the Sea Shepherds' attack.
Meanwhile, in a strongly-worded statement, the Nationalist Party condemned the "violent aggression being waged against Maltese fishermen" and expressed its deep concern at the harmful consequences to fishermen, the economy and the rule of law.
15 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
J.Bezzina
Jun 19th 2010, 09:16
Who are these activists? Who is financing them? Could it be they are being financed by other Tuna producers in other countries. Malta should defend these fisherman with all it's force.
L Camilleri
Jun 19th 2010, 08:01
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/whale-watch/sea-shepherd-ships-exchange-water-cannon-fire-with-japanese-20100209-no7j.html
Len Drum
Jun 18th 2010, 20:35
Lots of people who don't like Sea Shepherd are posting here
http://www.endecoterrorism.com/index.php?option=com_agora&Itemid=55
and here
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=120744454633328&v=info#!/group.php?gid=120744454633328&v=wall
Also at other sites on the internet.
These sites have much information about Sea Shepherds past as well as how they lie constantly to defend their actions.
Evarist Saliba
Jun 18th 2010, 20:07
One very simple question. Is anyone entitled to take the law into his hands on his assumption that the law is being broken? Government should make an unequivocal statement on its position if the rule of law is to prevail.
Isabella Peresso Fiorentino
Jun 18th 2010, 19:01
To all - These sea pirates, terrorists, and whatever it is you're all calling them, are defending the animals who have no voice. Full Stop.
Dr Francis Saliba
Jun 18th 2010, 16:45
Dr Francis Saliba(14 minutes ago)
Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is setting itself up as the accuser, the judge and jury, and the executioner, all rolled into one, in this dispute between it and fishermen trying to earn a living for themselves and their families within the law. This is intolerable. If they fail to understand this peacefully then the law should intervene, pronto.
l.farrugia
Jun 18th 2010, 16:29
IL-vapur li jghin lis-sajjied maltin ġie attakkat ukoll ukoll dan skond dak li tal-Sea Sheġherd qalu lil gurnal Ingliz. Niehu hsieb lil dawn il-mercinarju u pirati tal-bahar qabel joqtlu lil xi hadd. Dawn mhux veru biex jiddefendu l-ambjent qeda imma biex jaghmlu il-flus miinn fuq dahar in-nies. Ebda ambjentalista serju ma jiehu azzjoni bhal dawn fejn jistaw joqtlu lil xi hadd. Dwar is-Sea Shepherd smajna hafna stejjer fil-passat. Fl-artiklu li deher fil-gurnali inglizi hemm l-ismijiet ta min hemm fuq il-vapur. Jekk inkun hemm bzonn jittiehdu passi kontra taghhom fil-qrati internazzjonali. Jista ikun hemm interessi finanzjarji fin-nofs wara din l-agenda.
Joseph M. Meli
Jun 18th 2010, 15:44
The force of arms against these modern day terrorists is FULLY justified in self defense !
Dominic Vella
Jun 18th 2010, 15:01
Very interesting to hear the other side of it
http://www.seashepherd.org/news-and-media/news-100617-1.html
They had divers in the water too. They say the fish were caught out of season and many were juveniles. I wonder what the truth is.
r sammut
Jun 18th 2010, 12:41
Sea Shepherd activists firing at, throwing ammonia gas and other, ramming boats and property of unarmed fishermen! Actions to save the assumed illegally caught tuna!
Then these same activist did not lifting a finger in the rescue operations of injured men at sea and in foreign territorial waters where our rescue response team was not allowed!!! How pathetic?
Are these peaceful 'pirates' going to be patted on back by our Government of Malta and other international authorities?
Emanuel Cilia Debono
Jun 18th 2010, 12:15
This incident is a second example of lawlessness at sea.I am not versed in international law, however it is reasonable to expect that any body claiming a supranational right of enforcement should first of all be granted recognition and a clear mandate by an already recognized international institution. Secondly it must be authorized to fly an internationally recognized flag and be given specific rules of engagement which must be publicized in advance.
It does not appear the the so called 'Sea Shepherd Conservation Society complies with these requirements and the master of the Maltese vessel is correct in refusing permission to board and inspect. The intruders had no right to demand it and they are even more arrogant to use force in pursuit of their pretended claims.
The AFM deserves praise for its timely action in both the Greenpeace and the Shepherd cases. Let us hope we have not reached the point where the full force of the AFM will be needed to watch over Maltese fishing vessels at sea - their first priority- rather than roam the seas in search of boats carrying illegal migrants?
E.Muscat
Jun 18th 2010, 10:33
Greenpeace should be banned from maltese harbours,their ships seized and sold by auction to compensate the injured fishermen and pay for the expenses incurred by the maltese government.
Frans van Avendonk
Jun 18th 2010, 13:21
Let's keep Greenpeace out of this incident! If you throw mud just like that before we know it we get the Birdlife and FKNK involved as-well!
J Brincat
Jun 18th 2010, 13:46
What does Greenpeace have to do with it? Sea Shephard is not Greenpeace!!!
k.vassallo
Jun 18th 2010, 14:35
''He said the conservation group was not a protest organisation like Greenpeace but one that took direct action to stop illegal activities.''