Advert

Beyond myths and rhetoric

LGBT is a relatively new term in political discourse referring to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender identities. Despite its "newness", it refers to struggles for recognition and rights on the basis of one's sexual orientation.

In this regard, it is now recognised by many sociologists, psychologists, political activists, policy makers and others that sexuality is not simply about nature and biology. As much as sexuality has to do with hormones and the like, it is also a question of how it is defined by different people, different groups and different societies. Indeed, definitions of what is "right" or "wrong" in terms of sexuality are put forward by power structures in the economic, political, religious, cultural and scientific realms, among others.

If one looks at homosexuality, one can note different meanings given to this term across time and space. For example, many social policy regimes in various societies assume and advocate heterosexuality and discriminate against other sexualities, both directly and indirectly.

In European societies in the late 19th century, homosexuality was considered to be morally wrong and a threat to the family. Homosexuality was punishable by law and discourses were propagated against it.

Later on, it the post-war years, homosexuality was considered by dominant structures to be a disease, a mental disorder or an abnormality. In the 1960s and 1970s, however, various societies, including Britain and Malta, started to decriminalise homosexual acts, though this was quite a bumpy ride. Such decriminalisation was influenced by the sexual revolution and courageous people who stood up to be counted.

As the Gay Liberation Movement of Britain put it in the 1970s, "every person has the right to develop and extend their character and explore their sexuality through relationships with any other human being, without moral, social or political pressure... we demand honour, identity and liberation".

The revival of conservative ideology in the late 1980s brought about a new backlash against gay and lesbian rights and the AIDS issue led to opposition by right-wingers against some victories previously achieved.

Yet, as social theorist Michel Foucault teaches us, for power there is resistance. Various gay rights movements became even more active in their appeal for equality and respect, resulting in a political constituency that was also supported by people whose values became more open on sexuality.

Since then, various societies have introduced various social reforms - from anti-discrimination at work to recognition of gay marriages - and being gay, lesbian, transsexual or bisexual became recognised identities among others in post-traditional societies.

The LGBT community has made many victories, yet, many challenges remain. In some societies, such as Uganda and Iran, basic gay rights are still inexistent and being gay can actually lead to death. In others, such as the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Britain, Denmark, South Africa, and Canada, to name a few, various rights exist, including marriage and forming civil unions, depending on the country.

In Malta, homosexuality was decriminalised in the 1970s and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation at work was made illegal following Malta's EU accession. Yet, people with an LGBT identity are being discriminated in various other areas, most notably when it comes to family policy.

Green parties have always been the most progressive parties when it comes to LGBT rights. The track record of the Greens in the European Parliament is a case in point. Greens are also the most ardent supporters of LGBT NGOs.

Malta is no exception. Alternattiva Demokratika - the Green party's principles are not for sale. We have always been against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and, unlike the other political parties in Malta, we fully support the proposed anti-discrimination directive being proposed within the EU.

Besides, we are the only party with a clear declared stand in favour of civil partnerships.

Some may want us to go further and others believe that we are too radical. We invite all those who wish to contribute to our policy-making to take part in our forthcoming debates concerning our electoral manifesto.

If one takes a look at the other political parties in Malta, one can immediately note the difference.

The Nationalist Party keeps ignoring the fact we form part of a secular modern world and opposes the introduction of various LGBT rights. The track record of Nationalist members of the European Parliament is a case in point.

Labour, on the other hand, is once again characterised by its "moderate" and "progressive" balancing act. On the one hand, it has its own LGBT section within the party, which, to date, is conspicuous by its silence in the public sphere. On the other hand, it has members of Parliament in its ranks whose opposition to LGBT rights is notorious. Some tabled parliamentary questions are shameful indeed.

The struggle of LGBT activists and movements is ultimately part of the struggle for a more equal and inclusive society, which is ultimately what democracy should be all about.

The author is chairman of Alternattiva Demokratika - the Green party.

www.alternattiva.org.mt

www.michaelbriguglio.com

Advert

17 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jun 13th 2010, 02:27

It is a pity that the Catholic Church does not take Joe Zammit out of his misery.

Joe Zammit

Jun 17th 2010, 11:46


Joseph, the truth shall make you free. Homosexuality is evil and separates homosexuals from God and puts them on the way to hell. This is misery indeed! Those who are one with God are rich and want to make others rich as well, rich because they are full of grace, imbued with divine love and experiencing eternal joy.



Joe Zammit

Jun 11th 2010, 16:23


Dawn, you have said it yourself. They have a tendency. The tendency alone does not make them homosexuals. If I have a tendency to steal, I'm not a thief for that tendency. When I start stealing I become a thief. The same applies in this case. One becomes a homosexual NOT if he has that tendency but when he starts indulging in the evil sexual acts of homosexuality. By God's grace they can win all temptations of homosexuality.

Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jun 12th 2010, 01:36

@Joe Zammit - Oh dear dear. So we are just genitals are we? Does a homosexual only love a partner during sex? There are practising homosexuals and non-practising homosexuals. Incidentally homosexuality is a 'tendency' as much as heterosexuality is a 'tendency'. Zammit should also consult the dictionary. There are various meanings to the word 'tendency'. Like a tendency for a fabric to wrinkle ... that does not stop the fabric from not being a fabric if it is not wrinkled!

Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Jun 12th 2010, 01:42

If their God is so bloody minded it is time to drop him from everything. No crosses in classrooms to indoctrinate children. No reference to God in any matter that concerns the state. No kissing of crosses when taking an oath for public office. No 'Our Fathers' at parliamentary meetings. If they want to hold processions well and good but make them pay for the money spent by the State in such matters. Let's get over this god delusion! He has caused more heartache than good.

Darren Galea

Jun 11th 2010, 12:26

If there is a god, you're making him cry right now. No one can be this dogmatic.

You also, time and time again, provide a perfect example of Poe's law. Your ramblings are so insane it makes it to hard to distinguish them from a parody of fundamentalists as compared to the real thing.

Or, if internet slang takes your fancy, you are possibly the best troll I've seen on this website.

Nadia Zammit

Jun 11th 2010, 13:22

Sur Zammit,
bir-rispett kollu lejk bħala persuna, nara l-kummenti tiegħek u aktar milli jiddispjeċini għall-kumment tiegħek li jinċita diskirminazzjoni, inħoss li dak li ktibt huwa biss injoranza u aljenaliżmu. ma tistax tkejjel dak li huwa tajjeb u ħażin skond il-morali tiegħek li wara kollox mhix universali u wisq anqas rappreżentativa. li ktibt kien ikun wisq aħjar li żżommu għalik u mhux tiġġudika l-omossesswalita bħala "evil". li thobb mhux dnub u li tħobb bħalma tista' tħobb inti huwa BISS dritt fundamentali tal-bnedmin kollha rrelevanti mill-kulur, sess u reliġjon.

J Farrugia

Jun 11th 2010, 18:51

There are no special rights for gays and other strayed persons. They have only the same rights afforded to me and to other normal persons in this world. They dont have special privileges because of what they are. No, they should not have the right to marry persons of their same sex, which is an abomination of nature. and they should not have the right to adopt children. I have no special right to adopt a child, and these abnormal persons have no right to adopt children. Children come from the union of MAN and WOMAN and from no other unnatural formula. God made them man and woman to procreate humanity and going against God's plan is an abomination of the natural order. and we know what happens when mankind goes against nature. Disasters. And Nadia Zammit, this is not incitement, it is the plain God given truth and NO ONE not even the European or World Court of HUman rights will change a comma from what God has ordained. Man is nothing. Only God will Judge our unnatural actions and not the world or european courts. It's not for you to judge normal persons. It's the other way round.

Advert
Advert