Advert

The day war came to Malta

An air raid warning siren wailed over Grand Harbour just before 7 a.m. today, recalling the moment, exactly 70 years ago, when Italian bombers dropped their first bombs on Malta.

A few hours earlier, in the evening of June 10, 1940, Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini in a speech in Rome had declared war on Britain, thus casting Malta, a British colony, into the front line.

The first day of the war in Malta saw eight enemy sorties sowing death and destruction over a wide area around the harbours. 22 lost their lives and another 50 lay wounded. The first bombs fell on Fort St Elmo and the area of Portes des Bombes. The first raids also triggered the evacuation of the inner harbour population to other parts of the island. Many people started a life in air raid shelters.

The air raids were to continue until 1943, increasing in intensity when the German air force entered the Mediterranean theatre of war in January 1941. Malta suffered 3,340 raids, causing the death of hundreds of civilians and servicemen and reducing the population to near starvation as convoys increasingly found it difficult to fight their way through with supplies. The bombing also cost Malta several important buildings, including the Opera House, auberges and churches.

The air defence of Malta in the first few months of the war was weak, consisting of a few Gloster Gladiator biplanes and later, Hurricane fighters, which were inferior to the Italian and German fighters.

A PERSONAL EXPERIENCE

Work was the last thing on Carmel Mallia’s mind when, 70 years ago today, he woke up to air raids and had to move his wife and one-year-old baby out of their house in Cospicua.

Malta was under siege – after Italy declared it had joined the war the previous day – and the 25-year-old civil servant had one priority: to take his family to a safer house in Żabbar.

Their home town was close to the harbour and this made it a target during World War II.

In between air raids Mr Mallia, who has since passed away, walked back to their Cospicua home to retrieve his family’s belongings and secure the house that had been damaged by the heavy bombing. All this kept him away from his office, at the Public Works Division in Valletta, for two days.

One would think that the terror and destruction that gripped the island was good enough proof of what kept Mr Mallia, and others like him, away from work. But his employer demanded he justified his absence if he wanted to get paid for those two days. So, on June 15, 1940, Mr Mallia typed out a letter – keeping a carbon copy for himself – explaining that he was busy rescuing his family and home from possible death and looting.

“On June 11, the air raids were so frequent (I think there were nine that day) that it was practically impossible to cross the harbour... On the morrow, June 12, enemy bombers, coupled with nervous and physical strain, again kept me away from work... I felt that, even if I came to the office, I would be no use in the mental state in which I then was,” he wrote.

His son, Michael Mallia recalled that his father’s employer eventually accepted the letter as a good justification. In fact, his father moved on to serve on the War Damage Commission and became an Ambassador to Malta in various countries including Italy.

He noted that, at the time, he was not yet born and the baby mentioned in the letter was his elder brother, physics professor and environmentalist Edward Mallia.

When World War II broke out, on September 3, 1939, Maltese civilians did not feel as threatened. Britain had declared war when Adolf Hitler’s regime ignored Britain’s ultimatum to withdraw Germany’s attack on Poland by 11 a.m. that day.

Despite the gravity of the news, the Maltese did not fully absorb the reality of the threat that was veiled by the comfort of distance. But the people’s peace of mind was shattered when, on June 10, 1940, Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini declared war on Britain and France and turned colonial Malta into a bomb target. The following day aircraft of the Italian Royal Air Force attacked Malta, one of Britain’s most important naval bases.

“A total of 239 bombs fell on us that first day to a total of 54 tons. The Maltese islands would endure 3,340 air-raids lasting a total of 2,357 hours where a total of 16,000 tons would fall on them in the next 51 months... I was hoping that the authorities would commemorate the sad but historical date appropriately to remember the hardships that our forefathers had to endure in those dark days of 1940-45,” Robert Camilleri wrote in a letter to The Times today.

Joseph Martin, in his 90s, remembers seeing an Italian reconnaissance plane at about 7 a.m. on June 11, 70 years ago. The plane must have been studying the island prior to the attacks that followed a few hours later.

His sister, Blanche Martin, who was 20 years old then, recalled: “I lived with my family in Balluta. I remember having to help my younger brother down the steps. There were 96 steps. We then took shelter in a large garage underneath the apartments and were later told how dangerous that was... After that, whenever there was an air raid, we took shelter in a tunnel leading to the sea located across the road.”

She recounted that the bombing was worse in 1941 when the Germans attached. Once she was thrown out of the apartment by a blast. Thankfully, they were living on the ground floor then. Her brothers then started shouting “shrapnel, shrapnel” as they called her back into the building.

COMMEMORATION

The sounding of the air raid warning siren today was organised by Fondazzjoni Wirt Artna, which is holding a commemorative weekend at the Malta at War Museum, Couvre Porte, Vittoriosa. Tomorrow, the Malta at War Museum will remain open till 8.00pm. Special guided tours around the museum and underground shelters will be offered in Maltese and English.

On Sunday at 11.00am a public lecture on the first day of the war in Malta will be delivered at the same place by Mario Farrugia, Chairman FWA. This will be followed by a short re-enactment of air-raid warning procedures during WW2. Throughout the same period there will also be an exhibition of wartime photographs.

Entrance to all of these events is free except the entrance to the museum itself which will be specially discounted for the occasion at €5 instead of the normal €8. Children under 16 years and FWA members will enter for free.

The museum is near the original main entrance into Vittoriosa (Birgu).

For more information contact Fondazzjoni Wirt Artna on Tel: 21800992, 21803091, Malta at War Museum Tel: 21896617or email them directly at info@wirtartna.org

Advert

59 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

William P Flynn

Jun 12th 2010, 10:47

True enough Mr.Saliba. But you'd know perhaps more than most that neither of the two PM's who acquiesced to the GC on the Flag could do much.

At Independence and Republic, the British lovers would have presented difficulties at two politically sensitive moments in history; and the two goals had immense urgency and priority.
I understand that. Who can blame them from a tactical point of view for ticking the GC Flag into the Constitution at that time?

But don't you think they left the door open for a time down the track to revisit this question by the way the Constitution is worded?

And may I ask this. A couple of years ago someone who was a very senior public servant at Republic time, wrote in and told the story when he highlighted the Flag issue to PM Mintoff.
He said that Mr Mintoff hardly gave the issue a minute’s attention. By any chance were you that public servant?

How I wish I kept a copy of that letter. Can you provide any info please? If it wasn’t you I hope the gentleman is reading this so he may again tell the story.

Evarist Saliba

Jun 12th 2010, 13:49

@ William P. Flynn
Just to answer your question before your comment starts an unfounded rumour.
I never discussed the Malta's flag with Mr Mintoff or any other prime minister.
Thank you for admitted that my comment is "true enough".

Evarist Saliba

Jun 12th 2010, 14:50


As to the comment that our prime ministers could not do much, I would point out two relevant historical facts.
When the George Cross was first incorporated in the red and white flag of Malta it was against a blue square as a background. This was the colour of the ribbon which goes with the George Cross and not the blue background to the cross of St Andrew in the Union Jack.
The blue background was replaced by a red outline during the independence negotiations on the insistence of the Maltese prime minister.
His successor as prime minister went much further and removed H.M. the Queen of England from being of Malta, a much bolder move.
Significant changes could and were made, and to credit of both political parties these did not include the removal from our flag the George Cross, awarded for gallantry during WWII, to the people of Malta.

William P Flynn

Jun 12th 2010, 16:15

Mr.Saliba It’s just a question.
That the 2PM's couldn't do much was meant politically stir the pot further by throwing the Flag into the mix at that time.

Cosmetics by Maltese leaders compound the guilt;after that they became partners-in-crime with Gort.
My "true enough" remark was in relation to your saying "the GC was not foisted" upon us. The GC wasn't foisted but the GC on the Flag was in 1942. The GC medal and GC Flag are always getting mixed up.

It's disappointing to see people like you unable to see the shame of supporting a medal being placed on our Flag; but so be it. It’s the young that matter for they have the numbers.

I’ve seen nothing to sway my own steadfast belief that nothing and no one is worth changing the Flag over; for no patriot would want his country’s flag changed over him or his bravery. I am certain that the Maltese who died in the war would be horrified to see our Flag defaced like this; and by an Englishman; a colonial master.

I haven't as yet done run out of ammo in my undying efforts to restore our Flag. I'll never give up.

Evarist Saliba

Jun 16th 2010, 16:25

@Mr Flynn
Let me assure you that the slight delay in reacting is not because I am cowering from fear of your unspent ammunition, which, judging by your latest contribution, may be more like a noisy wild shot from a blunderbuss.
Still, do not let me discourage you from your crusades to bring enlightenment to the Maltese nation.

James Galea

Jun 12th 2010, 14:07


“Habits die hard but the old Maltese gem gem will never die. Hard times are coming and all you do is argue. No wonder the pommes gave you a GC. It kept your mind off the real argument and still does. Get real and start using your brains.”
Just like you did MR Joseph Ellul and went Sydney. It’s not polite of a Maltese to address his ancestors in Malta In the second party and tell them to start using their brains. All these arguments are second to none of important to us. We just argue for the sake of the argument and nothing else. We have time for other types of discussions but it’s not going to be an ex Maltese who decided to abandon this rock who is going to teach us when to start using our brains

Joseph Ellul - Sydney

Jun 13th 2010, 01:46

@J Galea. I am Maltese and It was the LP that banished me from Malta. Now that I answered your questions, I will tell you why you should discuss the future. I read and sometimes comment but it seems that Maltese people do not like to read the financial columns. There are many wise people who try to inform you on the TOM regard current affairs and financial matters and yet there is little or no comment. I take this as negativity on the common man. When Mr Lino Spiteri speaks his mind few people if any comment and some just try to color him as political. Every one who has some political connection in Malta is tarnished and if he does not he will be assessed as political. The facts are that:
Malta is loosing bright people due to stigma.
Malta remains in the heart of all expatriates
The GC is on the flag and should remain. (This has nothing to do with my opinion.)
Malta is no longer an important factor in World affairs.
Lino Spiteri is a great teacher and if you and your like follow his teachings you would be better off.

james Galea

Jun 12th 2010, 13:57

Quote” The George Cross (GC) is the highest civil decoration of the United Kingdom, and also holds, or has held, that status in many of the other countries of the Commonwealth of Nations.
Malta was the only country to receive the George cross as a whole nation. It is irrelevant who gave it to us at the time being. For me it just reminds me that our fathers showed great bravery in those difficult days where they suffered almost to starvation.
The cross on the flag is there to remind and teach every one of this. What hurts me is that some Maltese People do not appreciate this honour and just want the whole world not to Know about this. If we were to remove it from our flag we will be erasing part of our history.

William P Flynn

Jun 12th 2010, 10:32

So you think Malta and all its history and all its trials and wars should be defined by one medal.
And it should wear it on the Flag. Don't you know that only King George VI could have allowed that? And he would have been most unlikely to allow it and now, only his successor can authorise it; and she's unlikely to do so?

Do we want a medal that can now be awarded to a policeman for disarming a bandit to define our country and our Flag. I accept it means more to us; but in reality it's a medal.

The medal is the medal; the Flag is above and beyond all medals.
The Flag is our sacred cloth, the medal is recognition. Two different things.

A sense of proportion, please.

James De Giorgio

Jun 12th 2010, 13:39

Nahh, I'm all for keeping the George Cross on the flag. It just fits. We were victors in the world's bloodiest war, and it highlights the maltese-british connection beautifully.

After all, we're happily (or not so happily) discussing the issue in English, one of the official languages of the islands, and the GC is testimony to why English and English customs are so important to these islands.

Gibraltar reminded me a lot of Malta; same climate, same stock of people, countless Maltese (even the PM there is Maltese), along with telephone boxes and mail boxes all in red, signs in English.

It's who we are; Mediterranean with a high dose of English and that's our heritage.

We're Maltese first and foremost: that is shown by our red and white flag. And highly tied to our English legacy, represented by the small GC.

Moreover, for practicality purposes, it makes more sense to keep the George cross in order to avoid our flag being confused with the Polish one or the Monagesque flag by those who aren't that much into flags and banners!

A.Mangion

Jun 11th 2010, 22:07

The Normans and Count Roger had nothing to do with the Maltese flag Mr.Evans - even first grade children know that it is all a legend. The British spared us tyranny and murder by the Axis during the last war for sure but like all colonists it was all for the greater purpose of the empire! Hence thank you Malta and the Maltese for everything that's worth anything on this rock!

William P Flynn

Jun 12th 2010, 10:20


The officially oldest flag now, seeing as we allowed the Brit Lord Gort put graffiti on it, (and neither PM Borg Olvier or Dom Mintoff had the guts to restore it) is the Danish Flag. Legend has it that it fell out of the blue sky; which of course is factually accepted by the Danes.

Our White and Red goes back a thousand years. No news-media were there to photograph it or film it; same as no one was there to film or photograph Count Roger; but its legend is substantially more credible than the Danish.

I know one thing. I know our Flag is ancient and it was tampered with by a foreigner.

What's done is done, but the people still have a Constitutional ability to restore it if they so wish. More about this later.

ASpiteri

Jun 12th 2010, 02:12

brilliant...no need to add further comments!

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 21:16

If you really think that I "have an enormous chip on (my) shoulders about the British" you are either suffering from delusions of grandeur or old age is having its effects. I suspect that it could well be a case of both. As far as I am concerned, they were just a temporary nuisance whose last years here were financed by NATO because they could not afford it. Contrary to many of the people commenting here, I do not look up to ANY foreigners, least of all the British; never have and never will.

P.S. if you really want to know the history of our French and British occupation, read up some well researched books by such professional historians as Testa, Sammut and Pirotta, NOT the Laspina drivel that we were force-fed at school or those published by some obscure 'chief assistant to the assistant chief' whose only qualification was his being posted here by the 'Great Empire that was' to Lord it over the 'natives'..

William P Flynn

Jun 12th 2010, 01:06

MrCowie. The British interfered, took over, ridiculed and always pointed to the invitation when we objected to their treatment.
“Chip on the shoulder”? Britain squirms now that it can’t suck other people’s blood any more; no more pillaging and plundering,; they have to work like everyone else.

When the English arrived, the French were spent. The British soldiers were sick and couldn't fight and arrived just in time to accept Vaubois' surrender as he held out. It wouldn't have looked good on his CV to go back to his Emperor Napoleon and say, "A bunch of peasant kaċċaturi defeated me". So he insisted on surrendering to the British.

In the end the WWII caused the bankruptcy of Britain and its colonies learned how to fight them off their lands and sent them to dreary drab old Britian. And look at those ex-colonies now. Good riddance to the British rapacious Empire.

Lawrence Debono

Jun 11th 2010, 19:17

Hi Mr. Donnelly, I agree with you 100%. I would like to emphasize the critical stage that Malta was in 1942 and if it wasn't for the SS Ohio, Santa Elissa & the rest of op Pedestal, Malta would have been starved and deprived from defending itself. Who sent those ships and CREW over to the Mediterranean? Most of them never went back home. They came from the US! Very few appreciate the great efforts of the non-fighting personnel from the US and Canada, that produced and gave away enormous amounts of valuable material and food to the rest of the Allies. Even to the Russians received a lot of weaponry and planes from the US and the UK. Others brave individuals that came from South Africans, Australians, New Zealanders, New Guinea, and the numerous Indian and Nepalese regiments, should be remembered and thanked for their ultimate price that they paid to keep Europe free.

Jesmond Micallef

Jun 11th 2010, 18:50

Mr. Evans, hitler had other intentions beyond the Jewish issue. You are absolutely quite right in saying this. I am sure it would have meant further systematic extermination of human beings by those who followed his orders and by those opportunists who gave the nazis whatever they needed, too.... Some people got almighty rich from that. !!! I still cannot stomach the gasing of humans and burning them in their large thousands. One thing for sure, one has to be emotionally different to carry out such an atrocity in an intelligent, technological and efficient manner. As a human being, I still cannot stomach how all that happened !! British Imperialism has had its time, both in good and in bad times. Indeed I am honestly gratefull to those brave people of the WW2 Allied Forces who fought against such emotionally cold indifference.

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 16:19

I will have you know that I would only hang the PURE Malta Flag, White and Red, from my balcony and not any flag belonging to ANY foreign country.

As for your remarks about how I "would still be running nude in some field if it wasen't for the Brits", you must have been either drinking. I can trace my family (documented) till way back BEFORE the Knights came on the local scene and not to some dockside bar.

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 12:29

'What if?' questions are usually meaningless. History is written, often hastily, by the victors. What cannot be re-written is the fact that culturally and genetically - and even politically before the unification of Italy - we were part of the same 'Kingdom of the two Sicilies'. Do not be surprised at the people who display the Tricolore on their balconies; more surprising and annoying is the display of the flag of a country that treated us as de facto 'second-class' citizens, in our own land, for over 150 years and who arbitrarily chose to deface our National Flag with an effigy of one of their medals.

Jesmond Micallef

Jun 11th 2010, 13:10

Wally Velly Zarb, What does the following very british sample of english vocabulary remind you of ?

Illustrious, Victorious, Invincible, Conqueror, Glorious, Formidable, Majestic, Inflexible, Implacable,Repluse, Revenge, Vengeance,Collosus, Audacious, Valiant, Magnificent, Warrior, Devastation, Triumph, Indomitable, Indefatigable, Courageous, Glory, Warspite etc etc etc etc etc................!!!

James Galea

Jun 11th 2010, 13:40

So we were treated as second class citizens in our own country. You have to remember that we were conquered and if you look way back to the past it was the Maltese that preferred the British and not the French or the knights of st. John. In those days Independence was only a dream for small countries like ours. But during the war period if one had to choose who is to conquer him it would have been the British. One has only to recall what the Italians did to the Libyans, or what the French did in Algeria. I suppose things would not have ended up nice if all of a sudden Italy decided to conquer us just like it did in Ethiopia (just open an encyclopaedia and check). At those times the Maltese shuddered at the possibility of Hitler ever conquering Malta. The presence of the British Empire here in Malta was a necessary evil. We needed them here. The fact that we were dragged into the war was inevitable, few countries managed to stay out and I do not think that an independent Malta could have managed to do so.

M.Mifsud

Jun 11th 2010, 13:47

The question is plain and simple: did they or did they not shower us with bombs? Did they or did they not kill innocent Maltese like you and I?

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 16:05

@ Jesmond Micallef

The words that you quoted, "Illustrious, Victorious, Invincible, Conqueror, Glorious, Formidable, Majestic, Inflexible, Implacable,Repluse, Revenge, Vengeance,Collosus, Audacious, Valiant, Magnificent, Warrior, Devastation, Triumph, Indomitable, Indefatigable, Courageous, Glory, Warspite etc etc etc etc etc................!!!" all remind me of ONE simple word that is very apt:


A-R-R-O-G-A-N-C-E !!!

...of which we had surfeit over a period of occupation that lasted 150 years.

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 16:11

@ M Mifsud

You asked "The question is plain and simple: did they or did they not shower us with bombs? "

The answer is also plain and simple:"Yes, they did - because their enemy had a base here, in the same way that the Allies showered THEIR enemies with similar hardware".

James Galea

Jun 11th 2010, 16:50

@mar Vella-zarb
My opinion is that you go back to your history lessons, not as far as your family history but more recent. I cannot understand why you keep blaming the British for what happened to Malta during the World War 2. These kind of wrong teachings remind me back in the 1979 period when we were being bombarded with hate toward the British to justify their supposing dismissal from Malta. Little did they tell us that they wanted to leave any way.

Michael Vella

Jun 11th 2010, 15:04

We also got our freedom, including our freedom of speech, which is exactly why people like yourself are allowed to write as they do.

Joseph Mallia

Jun 11th 2010, 15:52

You know what the British can do with their George Cross don't you? work it out for yourselves guys. On a happier note... Viva Juventus, italia for the cup.

Michael Vella

Jun 11th 2010, 18:21

@ J. Mallia Not quite sure what Juventus and Italian football have to do with this article, football is a sport, war was anything but. Having said that i am glad you wrote the comment you did as it goes a long way to show how immature, obnoxious and utterly stupid you are!

wally vella-zarb

Jun 11th 2010, 11:42

"I would also like to thank the British Forces on the island who protected Malta "

Yes, it was thanks to their presence that Malta was dragged into the war. Malta lost many of its citizens, only to be discarded like a squeezed lemon after the conflict ended. The most significant 'thank you' that we were awarded in compensation was the massive rundown in employment at the dockyard when thousands lost their employment and were constrained to emigrate.

Jesmond Micallef

Jun 11th 2010, 12:48

Wally Vella Zarb. Malta was a British Military Base back then, they had to defend Malta, no !! Gratitude to the British Forces for protecting the most "Vulnerable and the Helpless" indeed. !!! Our own flag carries the Cross of George..........eh...........Have you ever wondered how to make a Maltese cross ?

Advert
Advert