Advert

Notary should have been jailed - chief justice

An appeal by a notary to be relieved from having to pay back money he defrauded his clients was this morning turned down by the Court of Appeal.

Notary Sandro Schembri Adami was on March 12 given his fifth suspended jail term after he admitted to misappropriating €73,292 belonging to 16 people.

He admitted he had collected the money from the people as duties on property transfers but did not transfer the money to the government.

The court had given Dr Schembri Adami six months to pay the money back and imposed a two-year jail term suspended for four years after noting that he had a clean criminal record when the case was taken to court.

He had also been given a general perpetual interdiction.

In his appeal, Dr Schembri Adami argued that as he could not work as a notary anymore and had no more assets, he should not be made to pay back the money he defrauded.

In his judgement, Chief Justice Vincent de Gaetano said that the appeal was unfounded and empty.

Over a period of time and repeatedly, Dr Schembri Adami had taken other people’s money and abused of his clients’ confidence in him, prejudicing their interests.

He should have been effectively imprisoned and not given a suspended sentence, irrespective of his cooperation, especially if he was not in a position to pay back the money.

But as the prosecution had not appealed the sentence, the Appeal’s Court could not do anything about that.

Mr Justice de Gaetano said that the appeal was unfounded and fined Dr Schembri Adami €200, which, if unpaid, would be converted into 17 days of detention.

Advert

33 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

J Micallef

Jun 6th 2010, 10:55

Mhux il-warrant jaghtik it-titlu imma l-kwalifika......

G. Mangion

Jun 6th 2010, 19:24

Leonard Gauci, ( I’m waiting for the first comment from the “Min hu bla htija jitfa’ l-ewwel gebla” your quote ) In this case I am { htija jitfa’ } Why dont you be clear, and tell us who is to blame for 5 Susspended Sentence's ? .............

Paul Borg

Jun 4th 2010, 14:11

U meta?? Ghax milli jidher intesa kollox!!!!

R. Gauci

Jun 6th 2010, 10:29

Diga ghaddiet sena mill-kaz tal-VAT u kollox indifen taht it-tapit! Tghid ghala??

M.Ernsting

Jun 6th 2010, 19:18

I think this is common in Malta that everyone is avoiding paying the VAT , and that even Notaries !! Whom are we going to trust? And what if the contracts or whatever later on are not valid! Look what happend to Greece all because of FRAUD!! In the long run we have to pay for all this . And this is called TAX. The good for the bad.

Daniel Borg

Jun 4th 2010, 15:49

you think so ?

Charles Sammut

Jun 4th 2010, 17:39

Like sending scam emails from Lagos.

Advert
Advert