Advert

Cana Movement evaluating state policies on family structure

Lawyer Robert Tufigno (left) pleading with Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi (right) to increase family-friendly policies. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier.

Lawyer Robert Tufigno (left) pleading with Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi (right) to increase family-friendly policies. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier.

The point of departure of the government's family-related policies was the principle of a permanent, indissoluble marriage between a man and woman, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi stressed yesterday.

Speaking during a visit to the Cana Movement, a voluntary organisation within the Church which helps couples prepare for marriage, Dr Gonzi said his was not a courtesy call but a "strong message in favour of strengthening the family".

"Despite divergent opinions, no one doubts that the traditional family structure is the nucleus of the Maltese society, a precious diamond we should guard with all our might," he said.

His comments come in the wake of a set of proposals by Parliament's Social Affairs Committee to regulate cohabitation and which also consider a form of civil union between same-sex couples.

Lawyer Robert Tufigno, on behalf of Cana, warned Dr Gonzi that the recognition of non-traditional relationships was "detrimental to society".

"The recognition of any other relationship (not between a man and a woman) is detrimental to society and goes directly against the principle of the family. This does not mean we should not show compassion and solidarity with these people but we cannot say yes to every request," he said.

Dr Gonzi praised the representatives of the Cana Movement for their sterling work preparing couples for marriage and guiding them through married life. He said the preparation phase was the most important aspect because of the challenges the modern world presented newly-wed couples with.

Dr Tufigno said the Cana Movement was studying government policies to see which of them were strengthening the family structure and which were destabilising it.

He called on the government to launch measures to discourage the birth of children outside wedlock. This did not mean giving out condoms but more education focusing on the importance of children being born within the structure of a family, set up by a man and a woman who became one through the sacrament of marriage.

Advert

15 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Roderick Cordina

Jun 5th 2010, 09:13

I am very sorry for you Mr Zammit of beleiving that the majority of people here are against divorce...you seem to be losing the battle and trying to convince yourself that you are winning...it is good to do so imma ta because like that you remain living in your own world....

As for the Curia and our PM...what is next to suggest? that sex before marriage should be illegal??....going back to the 60s

Steve Pace

Jun 5th 2010, 10:54

@ Joe Zammit - "Thank God, the great majority of Maltese and Gozitans are convinced that what we need is ONLY to strengthen marriages and families"

And to hell with all those who have had their marriage failed !

Strengthening families is the ultimate destination. How to do it is a difficult question to answer and requires a lot of preperation and study .

"To be valid every marriage must necessarily exclude divorce. "
I am not aware of many people who marry with the intention to divorce , are you ?


Divorce is not the solution just as killing a person is not the solution for his sickness. It's cruel to support divorce.

Comparing Euthansia with Divorce is a clear sign of either the lack of knowledge on the subject , or a misleading strategy to try to portray that all those working to legalize divorce are in favour of murder !

As to your statement that it is cruel to support divorce, i once again suspect that you have a very limited view and very little awarness of the reality .






Advert
Advert