Advert

Israeli attack difficult to justify - former AFM commander

Tunisians demonstrating in the Mohamed V Avenue in Tunis, yesterday, protesting against Israel after the Israeli navy stormed a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in international waters, killing several pro-Palestinian activists in a pre-dawn raid that sparked global outrage. Photo: Fethi Belaid/AFP

Tunisians demonstrating in the Mohamed V Avenue in Tunis, yesterday, protesting against Israel after the Israeli navy stormed a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in international waters, killing several pro-Palestinian activists in a pre-dawn raid that sparked global outrage. Photo: Fethi Belaid/AFP

It will be very difficult for Israel to justify its deadly raid on a flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza, according to former army commander Carmel Vassallo.

"The attack is very difficult to justify because the ships were on the high seas and even if they intended to challenge the Israeli blockade of Gaza they did not pose a threat," Brig. Vassallo said.

The deadly attack yesterday prompted the UN Security Council to call for an international probe into the raid and for the immediate release of all civilians.

The ships carrying hundreds of international pro-Palestinian activists were in international waters when Israeli commandos boarded the vessels, killing nine people after they opened fire. Israel has insisted the commandos acted in self-defence after they were assaulted with clubs, knives and metal rods, a claim the activists heavily deny.

"One would have expected the activists to make some form of reaction since they were provoked into defending their ship," Brig. Vassallo said, insisting the military action was harder to justify because the ships carried humanitarian aid for besieged Gazans.

Israel's actions sparked international outrage with the EU calling for an independent inquiry to establish what really happened.

Speaking from Madrid at a meeting of European national parliamentarians and MEPs, Francis Zammit Dimech, chairman of the parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, condemned the violence and reiterated the EU's call for a "thorough and independent" inquiry.

Foreign Affairs Minister Tonio Borg on Monday deplored the "disproportionate use of violence" and described the situation in Gaza as a source of "grave concern".

Israel has imposed an information blackout on the incident and civilian activists on board the ships have been taken to the southern port city of Ashdod for questioning.

The Israeli navy intercepted the flotilla of six ships in international waters at about 5 a.m. on Monday. The ships were on a mission to defy the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip and deliver supplies to the Palestinians.

Israel has blockaded Gaza since 2007 when Hamas Islamists took power in the enclave, home to 1.6 million Palestinians that borders the Mediterranean Sea, Egypt and Israel.

Egypt yesterday temporarily lifted border restrictions at the Rafah crossing into Gaza following the attack, while Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan called the Israeli raid a "bloody massacre" and warned Israel of irreparable consequences to their bilateral ties.

Four of the activists killed were Turkish nationals.

The French Prime Minister yesterday called on Israel to release French civilian nationals still held in detention.

Condemnation for Israel's actions also poured in from civil society with Moviment Graffitti accusing Israel of "illegal and senseless" actions. "Israel's attack on the aid convoy heading for Gaza continues to show its arrogance against anyone who disapproves of its unacceptable treatment of the people of Gaza," Graffitti said.

The Muslim community in Malta said the attack was evidence of Israel's disrespect for international law. "Through such atrocities, it is obvious Israel does not believe in peace. The massacre against a civilian convoy carrying medicine, food, construction materials, children's toys and wheelchairs for the disabled in Gaza shows how the Israeli army is using its might to kill the Palestinian people by depriving them from basic human needs," it said.

The Nationalist Party, the Labour Party and Alternattiva Demokratika also condemned the attack.

Advert

33 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Tarek Cheniti

Jun 3rd 2010, 23:06

That is besides the point. The fact that sionism is founded on a specific extremist reinterpation of religious texts that serve the political pursuits of a certain group of people does not mean that the kind of horrors we see today are the product of 'judaism' as a religion (or 'islam' for that matter). Judaism and Islam are religions. Sionism and Islamism are political ideologies.

Religion is not the problem in the middle east. After all jews have always coexisted with muslims throughout history rather peacefully, and certainly without any of the genocides other parts of the world have witnessed. No, the problem is colonialism, oppression,racism, apartheid and desire for expansion at the expense of others. Some (white) people tried to achieve that sort of thing in South Africa too and blacks such as Nelson Mandela were called 'terrorists' for standing against them. it's funny how we humans never learn from our history.

PS. I prefer to be addressed as 'sir' ;-)

Martin Cassar

Jun 4th 2010, 08:06

I too, with the opinion that all religions are identical as far as major human principles are concerned. However, the troubles begins and disasters occurs when we have fiendish in forms of politicians that try to mislead the world and bring the world at the edge of bankruptcy and fuel hatred among nations just to have some barrels of fuel (and now they are losing it in the water)...what the ex USA president stole from Iraq is now gone with the wind...divine comeuppance I presume.!

Mr. Tarek Cheniti
Point taken for suture ref sir! Thank you and good day

JJ Creg

Jun 4th 2010, 09:17

This news is all over the globe on 3 June
Israel's army has been using confiscated videos to justify its deadly raid against a Gaza-bound aid flotilla, and the Foreign Press Association (FPA) wants it to stop.

Charles Vassallo

Jun 2nd 2010, 15:00

Margaret Spiteri What you say is simply NOT true Margaret. They were transporting humanitarian aid against the imposition of the inhuman blockade by Israel. Israel has earned the condemnation of the whole world including the UN Security Council. One must also distinguish between the normal Jews and the fundamentalists who cause trouble even to the Israeli Government with their fundamentalism. As an example, the Orthodox Jews simply do not work or do anything except live on government funds and have children.

L. Attard Bezzina

Jun 2nd 2010, 18:24

A blockade is a legitimate and recognized measure under international law that may be implemented as part of an armed conflict at sea. A blockade may be imposed at sea, including in international waters. Let me also stress that Israel provided, in due time, not only information about the existence of the blockade, but also appropriate notification to the relevant governments and to the organizers of the Gaza Flotilla. The organizers turned down the repeated offers by Israel to transfer the aid to Gaza, because they had other plans. Can you quote which InternationalLaws you say were broken?

JJ Creg

Jun 4th 2010, 15:29

@ L.Attard Bezzina - Blockade is not a valid reason as it is a concept only applicable to war situations.

Israel's action is a breach of the UN International Maritime Org Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA) which was signed by Israel in April 2009.

JJ Creg

Jun 2nd 2010, 12:34

How accurate is the info on wikipedia? The website below may help to clear the misconception about IHH

This IHH on UNCR website
http://www.unhcr.org/48fdec2c20.html

wally vella-zarb

Jun 2nd 2010, 14:42

"Should Israel have allowed volunteers from this organisation into Gaza?"

Excuse me? Do I have a right to decide who goes into your house? Much as it would like to assimilate the whole of Gaza and its shoreline, Israel has to accept the fact that Gaza is a different country with its own legally and democratically elected leaders. The fact that the people of Gaza chose Hamas as their leaders in an internationally certified free election does not need Israel's approval. How arrogant!

Charles Grixti

Jun 3rd 2010, 03:52

@JJ Creg

AP INTERVIEW: Turkish aid group had terror ties," June 2:

PARIS - The Turkish Islamic charity behind a flotilla of aid ships that was raided by Israeli forces on its way to Gaza had ties to terrorism networks, including a 1999 al-Qaida plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport, France's former top anti-terrorism judge said Wednesday.

The Istanbul-based Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief, known by its Turkish acronym IHH, had "clear, long-standing ties to terrorism and Jihad," former investigating judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere told The Associated Press.

Bruguiere, who led the French judiciary's counterterrorism unit before retiring in 2007, indicated IHH had terror ties when he investigated it in the late 1990s.

"They were basically helping al-Qaida to target U.S. soil," he said.

Some members of an international terrorism cell known as the Fateh Kamel network worked at the IHH, Bruguiere said.

Among Kamel's followers was Ahmed Ressam, an Algerian who was arrested in the U.S. state of Washington in December 1999 on his way to bomb Los Angeles International Airport.

"IHH had a role in the organization that led to the plot," Bruguiere said, reiterating sworn testimony he made in a U.S. Federal Court.

JJ Creg

Jun 3rd 2010, 21:49

@ Charles Grixti - Over 37 nations supported the aid ships with over 600 participants aboard.

Among them aboard were the Notable people such as Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mairead Corrigan, former UN Assistant Secretary-General Denis Halliday, Swedish novelist Henning Mankell, and a number of parliamentarians from European and Arab national legislatures and the European Parliament.

wally vella-zarb

Jun 2nd 2010, 14:36

You conveniently omit to mention that among the civilians on board there was even a survivor of the holocaust and also one member of the Knesset. As these also members of a terrorist group?

International opinion is favouring the opinion that the only 'terrorist' in this incident was the terrorist state of Israel who bungled what could have been a simple operation and turned it into an act of Piracy on the High Seas, aggravated by murder. Their action goes against the International Law of the Sea which requires free and safe passage through international waters. The incident took place more than 80 miles off the coast of Gaza - roughly the distance between Malta and Siracusa - and cannot be justified in an international law court. Legally, it could even be construed as an Act of War because the vessel is registered under the Turkish Flag and, as far as I know, Israel is not in a state of war with Turkey.

p Agius

Jun 3rd 2010, 06:49

Do you really rely on wikedpedia to get your information????????

The IDF's reesponse was disproportionate and cannot be justified....The numbers speak for themselves - 19 death (or 10)vs 0 deaths.......I am pro Israel and beleive in the existense of its state but last Monday i was disgusted to learn that Israelis were made to beleive that the Flottilla is Hamas managed......In terms of the IHH's reaction to to landing commandoes , i think it is justifiable....the IDF attacked at dawn, fully armed with weapons and to addinsult to injury they attacked in international waters....What would you do in these circumstances? I would have done the same...It comes naturally......Thet IDF's response is not LEGITIMATE.....I mean should Maltashoot at illegal immigrants when crossing over to Malta....?

Israel made a huge mistake in increasing to the number of its enemies in the region....It's already bad for the Israelis and loosing Turkey would complicate matters not only for them but also for Israel's no 1, the United states.....Since Turkeyis a US ally too, the turks have now more power in political deals since the US has now to please both Turkey and Israel in different, possibly opposing ways....AND THIS IS NOT ALWAYS POOIBLE

J Farrugia

Jun 2nd 2010, 13:36

israel will never collapse. Israel is the only democratic nation in the whole region. That is why it will never collapse. We will never allow it. Not even Ahmadeenajad will succeed in removing Israel from the map of the world. Those who take up the cudgels against this free nation will themselves collapse.

Joe Gauci

Jun 2nd 2010, 15:06

Mr J Farrugia, Israel democratic? By stealing land from the Palestinians, destroying their homes, denying them enough food and medicines, denying them building materials to repair their homes destroyed by the Israeli forces, denying them access to their fields, Israeli settlers building on their land and destroying their crops, keeping them waiting for hours at check-points including pregnant women who many times give birth at the check-points? If this is what you understand by democracy then what would be an undemocratic country for you?

Emma Xerri

Jun 3rd 2010, 04:03


Israel's embargo exists so that Israel can maintain its existence, in light of the fact that the Islamic thugs who control Gaza, Hamas, have as their chief raison d'etre the elimination of the Jewish state.

Exactly how is the embargo punishing those in the Gaza Strip? Most people throughout the history of man have not lived with such plenty as do the people of Gaza today. Tons of needed supplies make their way into Gaza via Egypt and Israel everyday. Indeed, would love to see a study of how many Gazans are overweight.




Ramon Casha

Jun 2nd 2010, 10:43

The incident took place in international waters. Therefore, the Israeli ships were engaging in piracy. The sailors were under no obligation to allow themselves to be boarded in international waters, and were fully justified in defending their ships against the pirates.

The appropriate response to this incident is to for further aid ships to be accompanied by a military convoy - and for this convoy to use all the weapons at their disposal to discourage any future acts of piracy.

Jason Scerri

Jun 2nd 2010, 10:49

That's the whole point. The ships were in international waters and Israel had no right to board the ships. That's state piracy!

I was once a supporter of Israel's cause but the recent events and the unjustified blockade of Gaza has changed my mind. By isolating Hamas Israel was trying to weaken the group while trying to strengthen president Abbas but the real facts show otherwise. Hamas has been strengthened , Abbas losing more credibility and the poor people of Gaza suffering more and more each day.

Israel should remember one important thing. ie Hatred breeds more hatred. Till then there will never be a solution to the conflict.

Demis Paul Scerri

Jun 2nd 2010, 11:02

The people on the ship had every right to defend themselves against the soldiers. The soldiers were on the ship ILLEGALLY.

JJ Creg

Jun 2nd 2010, 12:23

In stark contrast to the IDF version, the Free Gaza Movement described the incident as an unprovoked assault: “Under darkness of night, Israeli commandoes dropped from a helicopter onto the Turkish passenger ship, Mavi Marmara, and began to shoot the moment their feet hit the deck,” it said in a statement. “ They fired directly into the crowd of civilians asleep.”

CNSNews : http://cnsnews.com/news/article/66849

Jason Spiteri

Jun 2nd 2010, 16:55

These comments are wrong; for an act to constitute piracy it must be committed for private ends, whereas Israel's intention was to prevent the ship from entering its 68-mile exclusion zone, which the vessel was clearly about to do (illegally).

Advert
Advert