Freeport, Polidano unaware of power station waste proposal
Freeport officials are completely in the dark about a proposal by the Finance Ministry to ship hazardous waste generated by the new power station from the Freeport rather than from Delimara.
Last week the ministry told The Times that hazardous waste stored in specialised containers would not be shipped from the Delimara quay where the power station extension would be built, but instead be transported to the Freeport either by road or by barge across Marsaxlokk bay.
However, Freeport sources told The Sunday Times they knew nothing of the matter.
"Although it would be the shipping company engaged to carry the waste to its final destination that would make the necessary arrangements, the Freeport might have to handle the containers in a specialised way given the hazardous contents," the sources said.
Apart from this, such a proposal would have a direct impact on the Freeport if barges are used because Enemalta would have to book a berthing slot.
Waste disposal was a bone of contention during the Malta Environment and Planning Authority hearing last Thursday that approved the full development permit for the controversial power station extension.
The chosen plant, which will be run on heavy fuel oil, is expected to generate 30 tonnes of hazardous solid waste every day that has to be exported under very strict conditions because Malta has no facility to dispose of it. Enemalta does not yet have a waste disposal contract in place.
The Environmental Impact Assessment for the new plant stated that hazardous waste would have to be stored in specialised containers and exported at a rate of 15 per week to avoid power outages.
The hazardous waste is generated by the emissions filtering equipment that is required because Enemalta intends operating the plant on heavy fuel oil.
The special containers were not part of the €200 million agreement signed in May last year between the government and Danish company BWSC, which will be supplying the new plant.
Each special container is expected to cost around €25,000 although Enemalta has yet to decide whether to buy or include them as part of the waste disposal contract when it is awarded.
In the meantime, the Polidano Group yesterday denied it has any knowledge of plans by Enemalta to dump construction waste material from the extension of the power station at its quarry in Siġġiewi.
"We have no involvement in the power station project at all," a spokesman for the construction company said.
The claim that Enemalta had decided to use the Polidano Group landfill at Siġġiewi was made during Thursday's hearing by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority, which gave the corporation the necessary building permits for the new extension.
"There is no agreement between Polidano Group and Enemalta for this to happen and it is the first time we heard about it," the spokesman said.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
george farrugia
May 23rd 2010, 21:02
Based on the Polidano statement, what the Enemalta official declared at the MEPA hearing is a damn lie. Therefore all other declarations made by Enemalta at this hearing should be suspect and MEPA has the duty to revisit the application and ensure that every statement made be supported by the proper documentation. This is probably one of the most important decisions ever taken by MEPA and its repercussions will affect ourselves, our children and their children for generations. How can the MEPA chairman go to sleep at night knowing that such an important issue has been decided on what is proving to be false declarations.
gerdes a wilhelm
May 23rd 2010, 16:52
'Freeport officials are completely in the dark about a proposal by the Finance Ministry to ship hazardous waste generated by the new power station from the Freeport rather than from Delimara.' (quote from the above article)
the same newspaper states in a full page enemalta ad on page 71 -
'The Delimara Power station will not produce toxic waste' under the headline '... the truth'
is this legal in Malta and is the public supposed to trust these statements?
daniel zammit
May 23rd 2010, 15:17
More waste and hazardous material for the quarry at TA BELULA HEJ X GOST.As if this part of the countryside hasnt seen enough turmoil and dumping of material to the detriment of the Siggiewi and Ghar Lapsi landscape.Tal-Misthija. Welcome tourists and enjoy another Maghtab.
Christian Sciberras
May 23rd 2010, 13:23
What the hell is going on?
How did MEPA approve without the right information available?
What the f*ck is MEPA doing at all?
Shouldn't MEPA make sure each detail of the project is in it's place? How did it approve of the project if there is no practical information?
I urge the Times to take action on this and ask MEPA how come this came to be.
(if it were me, I'd say some high-ranking MEPA officials just got an extra-large paycheck..)
G.Schembri
May 23rd 2010, 15:31
So what quarry is going to be used? Do the Local Councils know? Some years back there were plans of using a quarry a few metres from Mnajdra f, it was only the diligence of Qrendi Local Council which stopped them, by proving that such work would harm Mnajdra and Hagar Qim Temples. Are there anyplans for using this quarry, and is such information being kept secret until it is too late to complain. If this is the case the government will be commiting Political suicide, and the Gonzi administration will be remembered as destroyers of a world heritage site.
Joe Morana
May 23rd 2010, 12:20
Oh what a circus!! Never a dull moment...!!!
Is this what we (taxpayers) get from paying taxes and high(er) electricity bills? I have read somewhere that that Enemalta executives are some of the highest paid on the island!!
Is no one accoutable for such a shameful mess??!!