Cutting off power supply does not breach EU law
Suspending the electricity supply to households defaulting in paying their bills does not breach current EU rules, according to the European Commission.
A total of 2,148 households had their power supply suspended in the first 10 months of last year because they failed to settle outstanding bills. In many cases the supply was restored following agreement between the defaulters and Enemalta.
The statistics prompted Labour MEP Edward Scicluna to ask the Commission to establish whether such practice was in breach of EU legislation protecting vulnerable groups, especially in view of the recent hikes in electricity rates.
He argued that since some of the disconnected households included vulnerable groups, such as families receiving social assistance benefits, the practice could be in direct contravention of a directive laying down that member states had to take measures to protect vulnerable customers.
The Commission noted that the operation of the electricity market was in the hands of the Maltese authorities. However, it also pledged to seek information on how EU consumer protection rules were being implemented.
It pointed out that the relevant European law was not yet in force and that EU member states had until next March to adopt the relevant clause of Directive 2009/72/EC.
Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger explained that member states were clearly obliged to protect vulnerable customers under the internal energy market legislation. The Malta Resources Authority had a duty to promote the interests of consumers, particularly the vulnerable ones, in respect of prices, quality and variety of the service.
However, he added, the disconnection of the power supply to defaulting consumers was not explicitly prohibited at a European level, Mr Oettinger said.
Prof. Scicluna also complained in his question that, since last December, electricity rates in Malta had risen by 29 per cent while the average increase across the EU in the same period was of just one per cent.
The Commission said it had noted "the tendency for electricity prices in Malta to follow trends in oil prices".
It said there were differences between Malta and the rest of the EU, including the fact that the system on the island was an isolated one, with a monopoly of supply and derogations from parts of EU internal market directives. "Therefore, care should be taken when making direct comparisons between EU energy prices and those of Malta," the commissioner said.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Grech
May 22nd 2010, 17:52
What the E.U. Commission and in particular Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger should also seriously examine is the present DISCRIMINATORY AND UNJUST situation whereby owners of second residences are charged at exorbitant rates for Utilities simply because, no matter how many people actually reside in these homes, they are considered as zero (0) residents in the computation of the Utilities Bills!
Many owners objected vociferously with the present administration but it will not listen...how arrogant and unjust of them!
This is an unethical, unjust and discriminatory situation which I formally ask Gunther Oettinger to look into.
I will be most grateful to Mr. Ivan Camilleri if he will kindly pass this objection over to him in Brussels.
Why is the government treating old pensioners who bought a flat for their relaxation at the seaside in this despotic manner? This is simply not accepted!
I expect MEP Prof Scicluna and MEP Dr. Simon Busuttil to take up this serious objection with the E.U. Commissioner.
J Martinelli
May 22nd 2010, 13:36
"He (Prof. Scicluna) argued that since some of the disconnected households included vulnerable groups, such as families receiving social assistance benefits,..."
Do I take it that these vulnerable groups receive Social assistance AND electricity subsidies and yet still don't pay their utility bills?
Instead of subsidies, assistance and other tax concessions, why is the taxpayer not forced to adopt these families and pay for their upkeep and their bills?
By the looks of it, that is the next logical step, the way Prof. Scicluna presents his arguments. Maybe his boss, will next announce that a Labour government would provide free electricity to all.
How about all taxpayers default their payments, since Prof. Scicluna will use the same argument against disconnecting electricity for not paying their bills?
Prof. Scicluna's arguments seem to be proposals made by a politically motivated part-time economist.
J Oatmon
May 22nd 2010, 17:28
There are a few households who get assistance 'because the are vulnerable' and these families usually protest that they can't afford to pay their way, but they still find money to go to the pub on a regular basis, or to gamble on the lottery.
N.Grima
May 23rd 2010, 07:48
It's ironic that a highly distinguished professor of economics has to go to the European Commission for some common sense...
Dennis Zammit
May 22nd 2010, 12:29
One must first define the parameters for 'vunerable families' as there are those who do not pay for other various reasons apart from 'political' orders.
Joe Grima
May 22nd 2010, 12:15
That's your current EU - on the side of power not in the interest of the vulnerable. This EU makes me sick.