Advert

Sette Giugno monument to move to Hastings Garden

The Sette Giugno monument is to be temporarily placed at Hastings Garden in Valletta until it is incorporated in the new Parliament building project, the government announced today.

It said that maintenance work on the monument was carried out in the past few weeks while site preparation at Hastings starts tomorrow.

The work will be completed by June 7, when the events of June 7, 1919 are recalled.

The monument was removed from Palace square when that square was rehabilitated.

Advert

17 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Raymond Sammut

May 13th 2010, 12:45

It's not an issue of whether it is "majestic" or not. Different people will always see it in different ways. What is at issue about this thing is the distortion of history that it conveys. I have pointed out this distortion in detail a number of times on The Times. Enough to say here that, contrary to what it shows, only three and not four were wounded and died on the 7th. None of them were shot at directly. No orders to shoot were ever given. Each of the three tragedies was circumstantial. The British were being slack in allowing enough flour to reach Grand Harbour, while more and more people were supporting Mussolini in Italy following WWI.

Only recently, similar riots in Greece and Thailand, for example, resulted in people losing their life. But Maltese politicians think that in Malta riots are different, and require monuments.

The Maltese people are in the habit of erecting meaningless monuments. It is always easy to distort history, or to magnify it, or to diminish its importance, for political reasons. That's what the MLP in government did in 1986.

D. Spiteri

May 12th 2010, 20:46

Naqbel miegħek li l-monument ikrah pesti....imma ma naqbel miegħek xejn meta tgħid li ma għandiex nagħmluh f'post prominenti.

Dan il- monument iservi biex ifakkarna it- tbatija tal- Maltin taħt it- tiranni barranin.

Adrian Cachia

May 12th 2010, 21:21

What is so hideous about the monument? Do you know what it commemorates after all? I am glad Renzo Piano knows better.

Justin Tabone

May 12th 2010, 23:54

Are you kidding Mr Gatt.? You'r a perfect example of a parson without a historical background and without pride for your nation.

lgalea

May 12th 2010, 23:59

C Gatt The Shame is on YOU for denigrating a monument that commemorates an uprising of Maltese people against their colonizers. SHAME AND SHAME AGAIN ON YOU. As for the Piano destruction project, it is just that. A destruction project that is going to rape our capital city and will cause shame to the PN as the present city gate is doing to the 1960's PN Government.

Steve Borg

May 13th 2010, 01:04

Ma tantx tidher qed tgħaffsek qalbek għal dawk li ċarċru demmhom u tilfu ħajjethom biex Malta tieħu sens ta' tmexxija politika. Imma hekk ried dan il-Gvern - ineħħih minn misraħ ewlieni u jidfnu ġo ġnien imwarrab. Pajjiż tal-biki.

C.ZARB

May 13th 2010, 08:20

Who cares what Piano thinks? Since when Piano has exclusive rights on our city?

Derek Fenech

May 13th 2010, 08:23

I would suggest you refrain from showing your disrespect and utter ignorance towards Maltese history apart from the fact that you are talking about one of Malta's most respected sculptors. If according to your "artistic vision" (?) the Agius (teaching you something) does not fit the minimalist Piano design well the same could be said about the Piano design not fitting Laparelli/Cassar architectural design.

Raymond Sammut

May 13th 2010, 04:01

@ George Farrugia Snr.--"...it will always be in our History when they shot 4 of our citizens on the 7th of June 1919."

You are wrong, Mr Farrugia. It will always be so only in your head. Three, and not four, were mortally wounded on the 7th of Jun-1919. They were not shot at. One was hit by shrapnel. He was a by-stander while the mob was wrecking the Progress Press building in Old Theatre Street. The other two were hit by bullets not fired under orders and not fired directly at the mob which was advancing and threatening the lone line of soldiers in Old Bakery Street. One of the two was way back, corner Bakery/Theatre Streets. The fourth was wounded on the 8th with a bayonet while resisting arrest and trying to fetch his son among the mob wrecking a private house in Republic Street. He died on the 16th in hospital.

This thing was erected by Labour to distract people's attention from the Mintoffian mob behavior that had started way back in 1976. Gonzi should show a bit of resolve. He should have it cut up, and off with the bits to the meltdown centre.

H.G. Xerri

May 13th 2010, 19:32

With due respect Raymond Sammut i too read i believe last year they there were 4 persons shot and not one, i can't swear to it, but i keep reading different versions on this subject of Sette Giugno, now who is right and who is wrong, can anyone set the records straight as to what is the correct history version to this on that balck day in our History by the British rulers in Malta of that time. Some say 4 now you are saying one died from shot wounds.

Advert
Advert