Advert

Mario Galea blames lapsus on tiredness

Parliamentary Secretary Mario Galea.

Parliamentary Secretary Mario Galea.

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said this morning that Parliamentary Secretary Mario Galea had confirmed to him that he made a mistake in the way he voted in Parliament in the early hours of this morning on the opposition motion on the power station extension.

Mr Galea declared a 'yes' for the motion when he had intended to say 'no'. His lapsus caused uproar and triggered a walk-out from the Opposition, which insisted that its motion, condemning the government for the way the contract was awarded, had therefore been approved.

But Dr Gonzi said that there were five Nationalist MPs who had heard Gozitan Labour MP Justyne Caruana make a similar mistake, saying 'no' to the opposition motion.

Dr Gonzi said that Mr Galea had put down his mistake to tiredness and insisted this was a genuine mistake. He stood up in the house immediately he made his mistake, but he was drowned out by the shouting, insults and vulgar language by members of the opposition, Dr Gonzi said.

He said the Speaker was right to call a re-vote, and he insisted that MPs should be given a chance to immediately correct any mistakes.

It was farcical, Dr Gonzi said, for the opposition to try to claim that its motion had been approved on the basis of a genuine mistake by an MP.

Turning to Opposition leader Joseph Muscat's claim that Nationalist MP Charlo' Bonnici should not have voted because of a conflict of interest, Dr Gonzi said no conflict of interest existed.

Mr Bonnici is employed by Care Malta and answers directly to CEO Alex Tanter, who is also the Enemalta chairman. Furthermore, Care Malta is owned by Zaren Vassallo, a sub-contractor of BWSC for the building of the power station extension.

Dr Gonzi said that if Mr Bonnici had a conflict of interest, then one could only wonder what sort of conflict of interest existed in the case of Labour MP Roderick Galdes, an employee of Mepa, who had taken part in the parliamentary debates on the Mepa reform and the Mepa estimates.

It was becoming increasingly evident that the Leader of the Opposition liked gimmicks, Dr Gonzi said.

Dr Gonzi said that the government would be going ahead with the building of the power station extension, which Malta urgently needed.

He hoped the Opposition would decide and behave in a serious manner and that it would always seek the best interests of the country.

See also:

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20100506/local/debate

Advert

98 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

K J Vella

May 9th 2010, 23:29

Well better the middle ages than the Mintoffian pre-history of might is right, bullying, and violence.

Frans Sammut

May 9th 2010, 20:48

You're most probably right. The Hon Galea's was not a lapsus but a Freudian slip.

Joe Fenech

May 8th 2010, 16:31

Not just the oppostion leader is against this. What people are against is the corruption and the short term, non-eco thinking!

Marisa Bugeja

May 7th 2010, 15:52

Can you give us the link pl

Joseph Aquilina

May 7th 2010, 13:12

I agree, not a very good start of the new speaker!!

dusty williams

May 7th 2010, 11:54

Carmen HI

Fejn smajtu l kliem hazin???? Il bierah il PL hareg minn hemm f isem il poplu kollu... dan huwa kaz gust ... trid timrad bil kancer int .... ghal wicc dawk l ipokriti li temmen fihom??? jien ma rridx ... u tkunx egoista xbin hadd ma nahseb li jrid. Mela nsejtu kemm hrigtu l barra mill kamra ghalxejn intom fil passat jew ... marradtuna dejjem l istess diska. Imissek tisthi.

Daniela Fenech

May 7th 2010, 12:21

Ma nistax nifhem x'tip ta' ipnozi jaghmlu dawn l-MPs nazzjonalisti fuq dawk li jimxu warajhom (minghajr ma jharsu fejn se jiehduhom)!!
U x'demokrazija hi din fis-sena 2010, meta l-iSpeaker idawwar ir-regoli tal-parlament biex mozzjoni li ghaddiet favur il-Labour zgur li ma tghaddiex. U l-gvern kif jaccetta li jigri dan meta jaf li din mhix il-verità? Insomma nafu x'gvern ghandna! Jisthoqqilna hafna ahjar bhala poplu.

Is-solidarjetà ma' Joseph u t-tim kollu tieghu!

R. D'Emanuele

May 7th 2010, 13:40

good point

Joe Fsadni

May 8th 2010, 15:23

Forsi hemm min jaqbillu ma tixxandarx.

B Borg

May 7th 2010, 12:11

2013 - Joseph Muscat will claim that they won the general elections and Gonzi will order the population to vote again and again, until will regain the much loved power.

This sounds better.

Joseph Aquilina

May 7th 2010, 12:23

Truth is that none of them deserve to be in MPs. In theory being an MP should mean representing the interests of the people. In Malta (both for PN and PL) it means representing the interest of the party and the friends of the party. I do not believe in such a democracy which is why I am really disgusted by both sides on this issue and also on others.

lgalea

May 7th 2010, 14:06

Gianninu Saliba

The Integration Referendum of 1956 (February 11 and 12)

In Favor 67,607 % of registered voters 44.25 % votes cast 74.83 % of valid votes 77.02
Against 20,177 % of registered voters 13.21 % votes cast 22.21 % of valid votes 22.98
Invalid Votes 2,559 % of registered voters1.67 % votes cast 2.83
Not Voting 62,440 % of registered voters 40.87

Who won the Integration referendum Ġianninu?

G.Schembri

May 7th 2010, 15:34

You are misinterpreting history. You also forgot to mention 1996 Dr Fenech Adami + Dr Austin Gatt claimed a photo finish result. ( I would accept such a declaration in the last election, but not in 1996)
2010 Dr Gonzi calimed that 5 PN mps heard Dr Cauana saying No - whoever was following the debate can safely claim under oath that hers was one of the most forceful Yes.

Fenech M D

May 7th 2010, 12:00

This confirms what you are saying and what Dr Muscat said yesterday.


http://docs.justice.gov.mt/lom/legislation/maltese/leg/vol_3/kap113.pdf

No 113 - 5e

Ian Galea

May 7th 2010, 12:08

Because Dr.Gonzi, contrary to Dr.Muscat, doesn't clutch at straws!!

David Spiteri

May 7th 2010, 11:57

Mistake or not, all the parliament voted i.e. the vote has been taken in full!!! Thus, another vote could not have been done, because the vote taken was valid. PN MP's created a havoc in parliament to annul a VALID VOTE!!! This is not democracy anymore!!! NO!! This is purely an antidemocratic tyranny DICTATORSHIP!!!!! The same old story as in the 80s - the difference is the party in government - create havoc to shut up the opposition. Malta needs a speedy change in government.
And yes, should I was there instead of J.M. , I would also have abandoned the house after that farce. I would also not enter anymore, since I cannot accept an antidemocratic government to rule the Maltese parliament. WE ARE THRULY IN DEEP SH.....!!!

Jeffrey Mallia

May 7th 2010, 11:37

So does the nationalists after 25 years !!

M Tabone

May 7th 2010, 12:08

LP at that time MLP was against EU membership now you recommending that EU should intervene in the running of our Parliament? You mean MALTESE MUGABE because someone made a genuine mistake and immediately attempted to correct…. BECAUSE FAIRLY ALLOWING MARIO GALEA AND JUSTINE CARUANA TO SEEK REDRESS? What kind of messages are you trying to convey, why all this unnecessary confusion from A to Z? What’s wrong about going for a re-vote as after all stipulate in the standing orders of Parliament business? If he truly meant YES he would find no problem to repeat and emphasize. PN MPs find it abnormal to say NO..... because they belong to the Party that consistently voiced YES. CHEER UP AND HAVE A BEAUTIFUL DAY.

John Ebejer

May 7th 2010, 14:05

A Maltese Mugabe???? I thought that the PN was in government, not Labour!

Joe E Galea

May 7th 2010, 11:54

Dear Alex, what JM did was in the nation's interest. What you are insinuating about him is just pure blind partisan bigotism. JM wanted the debate to be televised so that everyone will know about this issue, since most of the people don't know anything about it. I heard it all on radio and learnt a lot about the disgusting ways this contract was given. Finally it wasn't the PL who lost by that vote but the citizens of Malta at large who lost.

Fenech M D

May 7th 2010, 11:58

Dear Alex

1 Justine was heard by all (on the radio) saying Yes - Dr Gonzi is not saying the truth

2 If someone votes in parliament it cannot be rectified, mistake or no mistake.

These are the rules, and one has to obey them and not bend them to justify one's means.

R. D'Emanuele

May 7th 2010, 12:29

@ Alex Camilleri,

It's easier to walk away than to deal with arrogant people.

A. Zahra

May 7th 2010, 12:17

You too have a conflict of interest. Why not own up to it?

M.Bezzina

May 7th 2010, 11:53

Anka jien niftakar f dan iz zmien ikrah li ghaddej minnu dal pajjiz!!Dak iz zmien kienu bil vjolenza illum iz zmien ikrah li ghaddej minnu l pajjiz huwa iktar fin min qatt qabel u bil pulit!!!

R. D'Emanuele

May 7th 2010, 12:25

@ Joseph Cassar,
The single most powerful tool for winning arrogance is the ability to get up and walk away from the table without a deal

R. D'Emanuele

May 7th 2010, 12:18

@ A Buhagiar,
It's a team thing. I'll definitely take the blame for my mistakes.”

R. D'Emanuele

May 7th 2010, 12:13

good point!

c fondacaro

May 7th 2010, 21:34

zball qatt ma jamettuh tal pn messom jisthu jivintaw haga bhal din fuq justin meta jafu li din se jkollha baby bin nies jidhku pero b alla le . justin hu hsieb sahhtek y taghtix kasom c fondacaro

Advert
Advert