Advert

So Malta would not be left alone

Cecilia Malmstrom

Cecilia Malmstrom

EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom will today be having talks in Malta on illegal migration, just a few weeks after her new appointment in Brussels. In fact, Malta is among the first EU member states she is visiting. Ivan Camilleri spoke to her yesterday.

Why did you feel the need to come to Malta just a few weeks after your appointment? Is Malta such a headache?

Well it's not a real headache but an important country where my portfolio is concerned and I think it is very important to talk to the people on the ground. This is also a timely visit before the so-called "boat season" starts and I want to see with my own eyes the problems and the challenges Malta is facing. Although I already have a pretty good idea of the problems related to immigration Malta is facing, it's always better to see with your own eyes and I am sure this will give me a better understanding.

In Malta, the EU is not perceived to be very beneficial when it comes to the illegal immigration problem. Are you aware of this?

I understand Malta's concerns but I think the Commission and the EU as a whole are doing a lot to help.

The new European Asylum Office (EASO) will be sited in Valletta and this is a very good thing for Malta as it will probably help, especially in handling asylum-related problems.

The Commission has also helped with international contacts to negotiate re-admission agreements, which are difficult to achieve with some countries. We are also trying to equip Frontex better to conduct its operations, giving it more independence and making it mandatory for other member states to contribute with equipment and resources.

Malta has also received quite a lot of money from the EU in order to help and so there are many things going on. Thus, I don't think that Malta should feel it is being left alone although I fully understand the feeling.

A few weeks ago the EU approved new guidelines for Frontex-led missions against Malta's wishes and just days ago Malta announced its decision not to participate in a Frontex mission this year. What is your reaction to this?

The guidelines have been discussed for many years, long before I became commissioner. It is the wish of member states to have clearer rules on how to conduct missions on the high seas and the lack of rules have also made other member states reluctant to participate in Frontex operations. That may also be a reason why Malta felt abandoned.

I really think it will be unfortunate if Malta has decided not to participate because Malta has a big sea border area and could only benefit. I am also trying to give more tools to Frontex to become more independent in the way it conducts its operations and it will be good if Malta could participate.

I want to discuss more with my Maltese counterparts about this decision. I still have to find out whether this is because so far no illegal immigrants have come to Malta this year or whether it's because of other reasons. However, I think it will be a pity if Malta is not participating as the island has a lot to gain from Frontex.

Do you really believe that the new Frontex rules are fair on Malta, which, in the eventuality of hosting a mission, like it has done in the past, will now be obliged to bring all illegal immigrants to the island?

Malta will not lead all the Frontex operations and the rules will make it clear for all countries of their obligations if they participate. There is also the possibility, before a mission starts, that participating member states agree on other rules of engagement, which can include the sharing of responsibility. So it will be finally up to the participating member states to agree on the rules.

What about more burden sharing and solidarity? Despite all the good intentions both are very lacking in concrete terms. For example, the pilot project launched last year to help Malta resettle refugees has given little results as many member states shied away from participating. So is the EU just full of buzzwords when it comes to migration issues?

The new guidelines might increase solidarity as with clearer rules we hope that more member states participate in Frontex missions. But although the Commission can talk about solidarity it is finally the member states that have to deliver and I agree with you that it is lacking.

We are now evaluating the Malta pilot project and I think it has been successful... I would like to find ways to make it permanent.

Should these things remain on a voluntary basis or is it about time to try to make solidarity compulsory on member states?

I think it is very difficult to force member states to participate because, ultimately, we don't have the powers to punish them if they don't. So what the Commission can do is to launch incentives and encourage member states. But, at this moment, I really don't think there is a possibility for mandatory rules.

What about more collaboration with Libya? Talks between the EU and Tripoli started years ago. Is there any kind of conclusion in sight?

Libya is not exactly the easiest government to cooperate with and you know that much better being neighbours. It's a complicated but important country and we will try to move forward. I've already written a letter to the Libyan Foreign Minister suggesting that we should sit together and identify areas where we can cooperate more in the field of migration.

I am open to discuss and reach some kind of agreement. We will now have to take it from there.

Advert

28 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

lgalea

Apr 30th 2010, 21:18

David Buttigieg Many of those who voted for the eu were deceived by all the fake promises that had been made. I voted AGAINST the eu because I want myself and my country to be free to decide in our best interests not foreign petty dictators decide for us. Whatever was decided could be changed again and we can leave the eu as we have every right to do according to teh UN because every nation has a right to independence and not to remain a colony as we have again been brought to. If you think we cannot do so I suggest you see the European Parliament video where it is clearly stated that any country can leave. I WON'T get out. This is MY country and I have a right to continue fighting against the new colonizer and their lackeys whoever they may be. For your information the eu is already crumbling and disintegrating, so it won't be long before it will no longer exist. Then bye bye to its obsequious Quislings. As The Times (UK) had said in its leader on April 15, 1940, titled “Quislings everywhere” “There are QUISLINGS in every country in Europe”.

Sean Grima

May 1st 2010, 08:57

you are making unfounded insinuations. i am as maltese as you are and not employed by an NGO. people's wounds? are you referring to the wounds of those Africans, who have known nothing but deprivation, civil war, corrupt governments etc? you premise that all africans arriving here are all economic migrants is also incorrect: most are granted refugee or protection status.

Sean Grima

Apr 30th 2010, 15:43

your comments are demeaning and simplistic: "their natural environment"!? we are not talking about animals in a habitat, but human beings! african countries are as diverse as european ones.

David Buttigieg

Apr 30th 2010, 16:35

L Vella,

I keep trying to understand your obsessive hatred for these people.

You don't even want them in OTHER EU countries, where they are even less of your concern, if I get you right!

Where you ever dumped by one perhaps?

lgalea

Apr 30th 2010, 17:56

Sean Grima we've already seen what their diversity means sean, Brixton, Paris etc etc.

David Buttigieg

Apr 30th 2010, 10:18

Galea, here's a suggestion, why don't YOU get out?

Sean Grima

Apr 30th 2010, 10:58

Such disgraceful and rude comments serve to reveal what kind of person we are dealing with.

Arthur Peffers

Apr 30th 2010, 12:58

lgalea, you really need to lose the chip on your shoulder!

lgalea

Apr 30th 2010, 13:04

Sean Grima and buttigieg, YOU get out. This is MY country and it is neither the illegal immigrants country nor Malmstrom's country. I specifically show my contempt to a foreign petty dictators who has NO right to order me or what my country should do. If she doesn't like it I don't care. If illegal immigration is beneficial she should take all the illegal immigrants to her own country because they are certainly NOT beneficial to us Maltese citizens except to those who employ them and discharge Maltese workers. As for you sean, when are you going to defend your country and countrymen instead of defending the illegal immigrants? If your heart bleeds for them why don't you go and defend them in their own countries? It is better to address rude comments to foreign arrogant petty dictators in defense of your country than simply saying yes sir or in this case madam while they shaft you while you keep smiling like the proverbial statue's Angel. This is the only was these foreign arrogant petty dictators understand.

Sean Grima

Apr 30th 2010, 14:20

lawrence, this is MY country as much as it is yours, and my education has taught me not to be rude, even to people i disagree with. whilst you have a right to disagree with her, your rudeness to the Commissioner is a disgrace to malta! and immigrants who apply for asylum will be staying here until their case is decided, and returned only if their application is not accepted, because that is what Maltese law states, and because none of the relevant political parties are turning an ear to what extremists like you say!

lgalea

Apr 30th 2010, 21:20

Sean Grima you have to be rude with these people otherwise they pretend not to understand you and keep trodding all over you.

By the way sean, who said my name was lawrence. l could stand for many names sean. Anyway, you can use any name because it doesn't bother me.

Sean Grima

May 1st 2010, 08:46

only someone like you can justify rudeness

Advert
Advert