Human Rights Court nomination based 'on competence not gender'
Madam Justice Abigail Lofaro.
While honoured at being the first woman nominated to serve on the European Court of Human Rights, Madam Justice Abigail Lofaro feels this is due to her competence and not her gender.
"I'm honoured to have been nominated for this prestigious role... I would not have applied for the post in the first place if I did not believe I was competent," Madam Justice Lofaro said when contacted.
She is among the three judges to be nominated by the government to serve on the ECHR, which has for years been insisting that Malta nominate a female to the post.
The other two judges nominated are Chief Justice Vincent DeGaetano and Mr Justice Joseph Filletti. Madam Justice Lofaro's name replaced that of Mr Justice Joseph D. Camilleri who was on the original list of nominees and has since retired from the Bench.
Since 2006, the government has been trying to persuade the European selection committee to choose one of the three male judges it had been nominating. The government insisted they were the most competent for the role because they served on the Constitutional Court that dealt with human rights. It argued that the fact they were men should not matter.
But the committee wanted that one of the nominees had to be a woman - in the name of gender equality.
Last September, the government caved in to the pressure and issued a fresh call for applications for the post specifying that at least one of the short-listed nominees would have to be a woman.
It received 14 applications, including seven from women, issuing the list of three nominees on Monday.
Madam Justice Lofaro explained that, throughout her legal career, she was never made to feel she had moved on because she was a woman.
Just like the ECHR had stipulated Malta had to nominate a woman, she said, the court had also laid down that one of the nominees must be male. Just like the two male nominees had been selected out of seven male applicants, she had been chosen from the same number of female ones.
She recalled how, when she completed her law degree in 1984, there were six women graduates and 45 men.
Madam Justice Lofaro, who sits in the Civil Court, was appointed a magistrate in 1996 and served until the end of 2006 when she was appointed a judge together with Madam Justice Anna Felice. They made legal history by becoming Malta's first women judges.
The Labour Party expressed satisfaction at the fact that the government had finally nominated a woman to serve on the ECHR.
More stories from The Times in the News section.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alexander Wright
Apr 28th 2010, 16:35
We are told that Ms Justice Lofaro is nominated on the basis of her competence, is it too much to ask for more details?
It is to be noted that not much choice seems to be available to the selection committee, its more a question of take a couple of senior members of the judiciary, squeeze in a female member (to keep foreigners happy) and hope for the best.
Is this what the cream of the legal profession has to offer in Malta?
Then again in this day and age, we are very lucky to find a couple of judiciary members whose name has not been dragged into the mud (rightly or wrongly so).
Gone are the days where being a judge meant something.
Charles Sammut
Apr 28th 2010, 14:26
Let me pose a hypothetical question.
Would the ECHR have objected had Malta presented 6 female judges? Would the ECHR have insisted that there be a male among them?
Pamela Hansen
Apr 28th 2010, 13:29
Charles Sammut is right in that it was ECHR pressure to nominate a woman that has resulted in this appointment. Therefore it is a gender issue.
However, gender bias is a human rights issue.
The ECHR rightly recognised that Malta was discriminating against women in their previous nominations and quite rightly insisted on female representation.
However capable Ms Lofaro may be, she has the ECHR to thank fo her appointment.
Rita P. Scicluna
Apr 28th 2010, 12:25
Judge Lofaro's nomination to serve on the ECHR was based on 'competence not gender', as you have reported. The choice of this nomination seems to have eclipsed the competence of the other six female applicants for this post. It would determine veritable justice to the present nomination if, at least, the names of the other six female contestants be publicly known so that your readers would acclaim Judge Lofaro's nomination.
Charles Sammut
Apr 28th 2010, 11:38
".........the ECHR, which has for years been insisting that Malta nominate a female to the post."
If that is not based on gender, I don't know what is.
We are talking about the European HUMAN RIGHTS Court here and yet this institution seems to base its principles on gender in the name of "equality" irrespective of all else. If this were not so, why was Malta's nomination repeatedly rejected on the basis of gender.
I'm sorry but my respect for this self-appointed institution has dropped to somewhere close to the level of the Dead Sea.