Advert

Updated: 104 trees vandalised - Mellieha council promises to double them

Mellieha Local Council has committed itself to planting 208 trees at the Foresta 2000 site to replace 104 young pine trees which were vandalised overnight.

The vandalism was discovered this morning by Ray Vella, the BirdLife/Din l-Art Helwa ranger in charge of the site near Mellieha.

Mr Vella said the trees had been sawn off. He said the trees were planted in October 2007 to replace other trees which had been also cut down by vandals.

BirdLife and Din L-Art Helwa in a statement today: “The failure of the police to apprehend the perpetrators of these crimes seems to be encouraging further violence and vandalism. The country badly needs to send out a message that these kinds of crimes will not be tolerated.”

The Resources Ministry and the Labour Party condemned the vandalism.

Advert

198 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Andrew Gatt

Apr 28th 2010, 21:17

Truly to be condemned. Without reservatiion.

But consider.....as to the tree planting, well, this site is managed by protectionists. Who protect. Impenetrable woodland is more "natural". If you're lucky, your kids might get to enjoy it on weekends. from 10.00am to 4.00pm...................or whatever visiting hours at Birdlife's convenience.

After all, they don't want you disturbing all those millions of breeding birds, now, do they?

And then they'll try for Mizieb...CABS already demanded this...DEMANDED.....and L-Ahrax.....and whatever else they can scrounge via EU funding to link up all their "reserves".........bets, anyone?

D.Caruana

Apr 28th 2010, 15:39

Please specify who the dying breed is and also the idiots.
Please don't be upset at me if i'm not intelligent enough to understant who you are refering to!
Vandalism unfortunately has been and will always be around so???????????/
Who are you talking about?

Alex Ellul

Apr 28th 2010, 07:54

I tend to disagree: Why should we be forced to spend money, my money, may taxes, because some grey-cell challenged sub-species of homo sapiens decides to, every now and then, cut down innocent juvenile trees? And would you guarantee that what you have proposed will stop the newly discovered sub-species from repeating it's manic acts? I would only agree if the money would come from taxes paid by another section of society that has a hobby very much different from mine.

D.Caruana

Apr 28th 2010, 08:57

This was meant at Kenneth Zammit Tabona
Awaiting answer!

Johnny Xerri

Apr 27th 2010, 21:32

Maybe that is the real reason why the trees were vandalised in the first place.

Vandalised trees = bad PR for FKNK

Bad PR for FKNK = hunters become unpopular

Hunters become unpopular = More likelyhood that hunting will be banned.

More likelyhood that hunting will be banned = More scope for reserves.

More scope for reserves = More funds required to look after the reserves.

More funds required to look after reserves = More money for BLM

Come on BLM publish your accounts and your wages and salaries.

That way we will know how much money goes towards planting of trees and for conservation and how much goes as wages

Joe Fenech

Apr 27th 2010, 13:32

You're right. In fact this shows the fractured society Malta is. There are some educated people, but a big part of the population is still living in the dawn of man!

Stella Calleja

Apr 27th 2010, 11:00

And do you really think this "warning" is going to stop them?

Paul A. Camilleri

Apr 28th 2010, 14:17

Who ever gave you the right to bring GOD into this situation? Let us not go back to the MIDDLE AGES when the church used to scare and poke it's nose in every arguement or disturbance. What next ? are you going to threaten us with EXCOMMUNICATION ????????




Alex Ellul

Apr 27th 2010, 10:22

As usual, scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Andrew Gatt

Apr 27th 2010, 11:15

Speaking for yourself again, Alex Ellul? You just HAVE to post spiteful comments, don't you? Try being objective for once....if you ever can, that is.

C.Formosa

Apr 27th 2010, 15:19

This area was a very popular camping site before this activity was prohibited there.
Another possible motive perhaps?

Alex Ellul

Apr 27th 2010, 17:14

Spiteful? You see how arrogance works? You call me spiteful because I post a fair comment? Is this the way you treat birds too? They cannot fight back, talk back at you or shoot back. You treat us like you treat birds: Shoot them and don expect a reaction. If it's not dead by the first shot, give it another one. You post a comment abusing of a pyromaniac's (a mentally sick person I presume) actions and his voluntary admissions to the police and then you call me spiteful if I reply. If only many hunters would voluntarily walk the mile to the police staion and admit to their misdeeds, like this pyro did. My esteem goes towards him but not to you.

Alex Ellul

Apr 27th 2010, 10:26

Great post Mr. Vella.

Jurgen Bugeja

Apr 27th 2010, 10:31

Naqbel mieghek li l-gamiema naqset hafna minn Malta imma nista; nassigurak li mhux tort tal-kaccaturi imma r-raguni hi l-esegerazzjoni ta'bini f'Malta.Ara kemm inqerdu sigar f'pajjizna biex tela' l-bini.Meta tkun fuq l-ajruplan niezel lejn Malta tinduna li Malta saret gebla wahda hlief bini ma tarax.L-gamiema x'hin tkun qed tpassi minn Malta jew mix tieqaf jew innkella mhix iddum f'Malta ghax m'em xejn attrajenti ghalija.

jscerri

Apr 26th 2010, 22:28

meta toqtol it tajr bla kontroll tkun qieghed indirettament tafetwa l ekologija allura is sigar...

ftheuma

Apr 26th 2010, 19:02

Well said Mr Brincat.

Neville Calleja

Apr 27th 2010, 07:24

Three cheers to that. Let us show the perpetrators that they're outnumbered.

David Borg

Apr 27th 2010, 08:00

Excellent approach...this should be our answer to the vandals.

J Oatmon

Apr 26th 2010, 16:37

If don't think volunteers/wardens are going to be watching trees at 3am - or whatever, I think that would be unreasonable.

j.cutajar

Apr 26th 2010, 16:40

''How can wrongdoers with noisy (?) chainsaws get away without being caught ''

Exactly the same way wrongdoers with noisy (?) guns do

Joseph Calleja

Apr 26th 2010, 17:04

Are you insinuating this is an inside job?

James Spiteri

Apr 26th 2010, 22:12

that still wouldn't work cos every one knows that the tape would be seen only if there's vandalism, so a baseball hat or a hoody would be enough to avoid detection

D.Caruana

Apr 26th 2010, 16:21

For once,
I fully agree with Chris Finch!

Jurgen Bugeja

Apr 26th 2010, 17:44

Joe Muscat the best comment, fully agreed with you.

charlo' sammut

Apr 26th 2010, 19:31

tal misthija dawn iridu terga tiftah il kacca??????????????

Stella Calleja

Apr 26th 2010, 18:53

Indeed, you're right. But I think they overlooked that fact. Not saying that all hunters are like this, but I'm pretty sure that a small number of them (that happen to be very furious about the spring hunting issue) thought it would be a good idea to show everyone just how pissed off they are by ripping apart a few trees. Sounds just like them.

Alex Ellul

Apr 27th 2010, 10:24

CCTV camera. LOL, what a target it would make.......................

G.Debono

Apr 26th 2010, 16:24

Your attitude and insinuations are disgusting. I am glad I do not know you. And I am proud to be Maltese, because the Maltese I know, do not stick their heads in the sand claiming what you are trying to claim, as long as you try to save the hunters face which is as tarnished as ever. Surely this case just re-enforces the general feeling rather than surprise us.

Anthony Formosa

Apr 26th 2010, 15:15

V.Falzon, please read carefully: Extracted from EU directives.

Sustainable Hunting within and around the Natura 2000 Network

The EU Birds (Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds) and Habitats directive (Directive 92/43/EEC) fully recognise the legitimacy of hunting as a form of sustainable use. They do limit this activity to certain species and provide rules governing their exploitation.

Hunters will benefit from these forestas 2000, therefore the culprits are playing a good game.

Alex Ellul

Apr 26th 2010, 15:06

Hunting works like this: Trees attract birds. Hence my trees attract birds which I can shoot on. Hence the more fast-growing trees I can plant on my own patch the more birds I can shoot on. However, trees in other peoplespatches also attract birds, hence they are in competiion with my trees and reduce my chances of shooting birds. Foresta 2000 is a project that ultimately will be like a small forest where hunters will (hopefully) be barred from entering (legally). Solution: Destroy Foresta 2000.

2. One way to get the money back on such vile acts is to levy a tax on the lead shot cartridges.

3. Trees are nature's way of capturing carbon dioxide which supposedly is causing global warming which our government is spending millions to be in congruence with the international community in its fight to reduce global warming gases. Destroying trees = waste of our own taxes and destroyinh our planet

S Vella

Apr 26th 2010, 15:37

@Alex Ellul
With your logistics then a hunter would go and cut down another hunter's fast growing trees not trees of a small forest where hunters will (hopefully) be barred from entering (legally). Trees do not catch birds, only attract them so other hunters are his competitors.
I HOPE THAT WHOEVER DID THIS ACT OF VIOLENCE WILL BE COUGHT AND PROSECUTED BUT YOU CANNOT BLAME ANYONE UNTILL THE CULPRIT IS COUGHT AND THE POLICE HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO TAKE HIM/THEM TO COURT. IT COULD BE ANYONE.

G.Bonnici

Apr 26th 2010, 16:03

Alex, I am a hunter and I totally disagree with your non sense assumption.
For me and for all the hunters, the more trees there are in the countryside the better. There is nothing such as a competition regarding trees that are not in a hunter's property.
We, the hunters love trees and care for them irrelevant where they are. I doesn't only hunt game birds, but also like to observe non hunt-able birds.
So the more trees in our country, the more birds are attracted towards the islands and therefore the more game birds I can hunt and the more non hunt-able birds I can observe.

So finally I think that planting trees in sites such as Foresta 2000 is also beneficial for hunters and there is no need for hunters to vandalize.

And by the way a levy on lead will also effect you when coming to buy products containing lead such as a car battery. Think wisely before you suggest!

S Vella

Apr 26th 2010, 15:59

@ Mark Sultana
Yes of course, because when you and other anti hunting accuse hunters, you are accusing about 12000 people. If you know of any poachers or criminals go ahead and speak out becuase that way you will be helping the police. FKNK offered to pay for police with BLM and CABS if the season was opened as Ornis suggested and made the self regulation suggestions and applications for Marshalls, what else do you expect?
STOP BLAMING AND PESTERING HUNTERS

Anthony Formosa

Apr 26th 2010, 15:28

luckily you were just a kinder teacher and not a Judge. Vandalism is the success of our teachers or better ex. Don't keep wondering just spit it out, but then prove it. Recently a forest was burnt by developers, if this happened in Malta, it would be certainly hunters.

J Tabone

Apr 26th 2010, 15:03

Oh come on! be realistic... do you think that such a problem should be tackled by a prime minister??? Everyone think the prime minister is god almighty!

J. Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 15:43

Jew DELIZJU jew INTAJRU.....rings a bell??

Anthony Formosa

Apr 26th 2010, 18:55

Read J Borg,

Sustainable Hunting within and around the Natura 2000 Network

The EU Birds (Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds) and Habitats directive (Directive 92/43/EEC) fully recognise the legitimacy of hunting as a form of sustainable use. They do limit this activity to certain species and provide rules governing their exploitation.



HAPPY now, those trees belong to everyone including hunters.

Jesmond Micallef

Apr 26th 2010, 14:31

Thats why I beleive that prison cells do not work. Zoos in this regard are much better !!!

SHAME ON WHOEVER DID THIS. You are cowards, nothing else but pure cowards.

R. Gatt

Apr 26th 2010, 16:04

@ John O Scerri

Fully agree with you except the part where you classify such insignificant life forms as animals. No animal would resort to such tactic to vent anger/frustration.....at best animals would simply pee against the trees to mark their territory.

Would suggest that if caught, the perpetrators be physically and chemically (as an additional precaution) castrated to help prevent the propagation of idiocy within their family tree and subsequently within our society......besides being forced to replant double the amount of vandalised trees, imprisonment and a hefty fine to top it all.

Joe Fenech

Apr 26th 2010, 14:05

Many hunter would like to believe that!

m.ellul

Apr 26th 2010, 14:03

very well said...agree with you 101%

tony stivala

Apr 26th 2010, 17:31

What is the betting that they get vandalised too

Jason Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 13:28

Taf xi haga fuqu? Fil-kaz irraporta l-pulizija. Inkella taghmilx kalunji biex tghatti xtur dawk li tissimpatizza maghhom.

Adrian Cachia

Apr 26th 2010, 13:54

Are you in a way saying that Mr. Spiteri spent the night sawing the trees?

Jason Borg,

Apr 26th 2010, 14:02

Lill- Jason Borg,

Miskin hu dak ir-ranger!!
min jaf kemm ihossu demoralizzat li ghat tieni darba ma rnexxielux iwaqqaf lill vandali!
It-Tieni darba fl-istess post!!!

Anthony Formosa

Apr 26th 2010, 14:48

Sur Borg, X'arroganza, int min qed iwahhal fil-kaccaturi tafu b'xi wkoll? fil-kas irrapurtaw ukoll.

Jason Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 15:05

Jien qed nirreferi ghall-frazi "martyr st ranger" li qal is-Sur Spiteri. Flok issaqsu lili (Sur Formosa, il-kaccaturi inti zeffinthom fin-nofs mhux jien), saqsu lil A. Spiteri x'ried jghid biha.

Jason Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 13:29

Ghax ma titkellimx car ha nifhmu sew dak li qed tghid?

G.Caruana

Apr 26th 2010, 13:31

"WELL GUARDED" etc.. You are basically implying that it was the Ranger himself that made the vandalisim. (albeit in an indirect manner)

M.gatt

Apr 26th 2010, 14:20

Yep, sure does

J. Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 16:13

ZERO TOLERANCE......?!

D.Caruana

Apr 26th 2010, 14:06

Dear Stella Calleja,

Please be careful, remember, BLM have already voiced their anger at the government for opening this year's hunting season!!

Stella Calleja

Apr 26th 2010, 19:02

@ D. Caruana

Why should I "be careful"? I'm just speculating... just like everyone else commenting here. And I DO think that this happened probably because of a small number of particularly idiotic hunters who want to vent their anger by destroying projects associated with Birdlife.

So you're saying Birdlife didn't want the spring hunting to open at all.....so what? Does that justify the hunters' anger? Personally I agree with BLM, for various scientifically backed-up reasons. The fact is that many birds are declining in number, so we must stop hunting in spring altogether if we want to allow them to recuperate and repopulate. This is proven to be true; no use lying about it. To remedy it we have to stop hunting, or limit it a LOT.

I have nothing against hunters personally, I'm not the type who hates people just because they hunt. Many of my family members are (or were) hunters... What I don't like is the hunting itself, because apart from the fact that birds die unnecessarily, their population numbers decline drastically...and for what reason? Just for a few moments of fun?

G.Bonnici

Apr 26th 2010, 15:11

Don't accuse if you you don't know.

Or simply don't go for birdlife's bait to for another time trying to change the public's opinion against the hunters.

J. Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 15:30

On the defensive are we? Mr. Bonnici ...

or rather cheeky offensive......dig deeper!

Gary Bonnici

Apr 26th 2010, 18:02

J.Borg, The word that we are "offensive" seem to be your weapon!

G.Bonnici

Apr 26th 2010, 14:51

If you are referring to the hunters or trappers, I'll tell you what about giving a sentence and punish those who are abusing from the hunters' rights by preventing us from practicising our tradition, and playing with our sentiments and mind?

What about punishing those who are brainwashing other people and children with lies and misinformation?

And by the way I don't agree with this vandalism and condemn it, since I love trees.

Joe Aquilina

Apr 26th 2010, 15:11

Dear Mr. N Calleja
I with you agree that whoever is caught doing these shameful acts should be brought to justice and made to pay for it all. On the other hand you are just being discriminate to say that this was done by hunters. Although you were afraid to say it you still said it. May I tell you that when 2 years ago the same thing happened, a number of local shooters where apprehended by the police and samples taken from them to see if there was any sign that they had been involved. ALL were released and thanks to that act the government closed the shooting season early that season. So please keep comments like yours to yourself and you will fare better with you mouth shut.

Anthony Borg

Apr 26th 2010, 17:08

Mr. Calleja, I am not a hunter and never dream of shooting an animal or bird...but yes, I am frustrated by this government's attitude in dealing with environmental problems. That doen't make me go out and do acts of vandalism. These typical acts are not the work of frustrated people but ignorant ones with no brains!

Neville Calleja

Apr 27th 2010, 07:30

While clearly the suspicion exists, one cannot assume it was a hunter. Even if it was, one cannot condemn all the hunters for the irresponsible acts of a handful of societal leeches. On one thing I agree with you - it must have been a savage (or group of savages) - one which, in an ideal world, should not be allowed to live and reproduce.

RGatt

Apr 28th 2010, 09:42

Yes you're right that these trees belong to all of us, but then so does the countryside and the birds that are shot down illegally. Whoever thinks or believes it was not hunters, you're only fooling yourselves. Did we by any chance get the trees from Germany as the hunters might see them as foreign interferance.

G.Bonnici

Apr 26th 2010, 14:43

Jason, do not accuse if you do not have any idea and neither assume.

You always accuse hunters when some kind of vandalism takes place.

Don't be ignorant!

JOHN MIFSUD-NAVARRO

Apr 26th 2010, 15:44

'vengeance is Mine and retribution .
in due time their foot will slip; For the day of their calamity is n ear,
And the impending things are hastening upon them.'
Deutoronomy 3235

Advert
Advert